MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417004071 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1800

Promising response rates and manageable safety with mosunetuzumab plus lenalidomide (Mosun-Len) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL): US extension cohort from the Phase III CELESTIMO study

2025· article· en· W4417004071 sur OpenAlexaff
Dahlia Sano, Nancy L. Bartlett, Elizabeth Budde, Brett T. Brinker, Rakhee Vaidya, Sunil Babu, Catherine Diefenbach, Chijioke Nze, Connie Ma, Andrea Knapp, Michelle Y. Doral, Vivian Chen, Paloma Hauser, Michael C. Wei, Anna Phillips, Natalie Surh, Adam Jan, Enkhtsetseg Purev, Nina Wagner‐Johnston

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensRoche (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLenalidomideFollicular lymphomaCohortAdverse effectRituximabCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsCytokine release syndromePhases of clinical research

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: CELESTIMO (NCT04712097) is a randomized, multi-center, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Mosun-Len vs rituximab plus lenalidomide in patients with R/R FL. The non-randomized, single arm US extension (Arm C) of CELESTIMO further evaluates the efficacy and safety of Mosun-Len in US patients. We report the focused enrollment strategies implemented in Arm C, and preliminary efficacy and safety outcomes. Methods: To overcome enrollment barriers in the US for CELESTIMO, several targeted recruitment strategies were introduced. Key measures included the expansion of the US site footprint to include community sites and locations that were not historically participating in clinical trials; conducting a dedicated US-focused investigator meeting with comprehensive training; creating tailored materials based on investigator feedback; engaging investigators and site staff through 1:1 interaction; customized recruitment strategies for individual sites; and centralized support for patients and caregivers to ease participation challenges. In this non-randomized, single arm US extension, patients received intravenous mosunetuzumab plus oral lenalidomide, as described for Arm A by Nastoupil et al. 2022 (J Clin Oncol). Preliminary efficacy was evaluated by investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR), using Lugano criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Safety objectives included incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 and the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy grading criteria (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019), respectively. Results: At data cut-off (June 9, 2025), 54 patients were enrolled in the US extension Arm C of the CELESTIMO trial. Enrollment took place between September 2023 and December 2024, highlighting the success of the focused recruitment strategies, which streamlined the recruitment process and were instrumental in achieving rapid enrollment and demographic representation of the US population of patients with FL. Overall, 87.0% (47/54) of patients identified as White, 5.6% (3/54) as Asian, 3.7% (2/54) as African American, and 1.9% (1/54) as mixed race (American Indian/White); 22.2% (12/54) of patients identified as Hispanic or Latino. Median age was 62 years (range: 37–82); 59.3% (32/54) of patients were male; 40.4% (21/52) had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score of ≥3; 29.6% (16/54) had progressive disease within 24 months of first systemic therapy; 39.6% (19/48) were refractory to prior anti-CD20 therapy; and 17.0% (9/53) of patients had double-refractory disease. Median duration of follow-up was 12.7 months (range: 5–20). ORR was 96.3% (n=52/54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 90.3–100.0) and CRR was 87.0% (n=47/54; 95% CI 75.1–94.6). All patients experienced at least one AE (any grade) and 57.4% experienced a Grade (Gr) 3–4 AE. Serious AEs occurred in 27.8% of patients, and 11.1% and 18.5% of patients had an AE that led to mosunetuzumab and lenalidomide withdrawal, respectively. AEs related to mosunetuzumab and lenalidomide were reported in 88.9% and 92.6% of patients, respectively. One fatal mosunetuzumab-related AE (pneumonia) occurred. CRS was reported in 27.8% of patients (Gr 1, 22.2%; Gr 2, 3.7%; Gr 3, 1.9%); all CRS events resolved. Median duration of CRS was 4 days (range: 1–23). Neutropenia occurred in 40.7% of patients (Gr 1, 3.7%; Gr 2, 3.7%, Gr 3, 22.2%; Gr 4, 11.1%) and febrile neutropenia occurred in 3.7% of patients (all Gr 3). Infections were reported in 57.4% of patients (most common: COVID-19, 20.4%; sinusitis, 18.5%; upper respiratory tract infection, 16.7%) and were mainly Gr 2 (44.4%) in severity. Conclusions: The rapid and successful enrollment to the US extension of CELESTIMO may provide a roadmap for addressing challenges in clinical trial recruitment. Insights gained from this experience underscore the importance of patient-centric approaches for improving trial accessibility and ensuring demographic representation. Preliminary data support the potential for Mosun-Len as an effective and well-tolerated outpatient combination treatment for US patients with R/R FL. Continued efforts to address patient-, site-, and system-level barriers to trial participation are essential for advancing innovative therapies and improving outcomes for US patients with FL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→