MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417004071 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1800

Promising response rates and manageable safety with mosunetuzumab plus lenalidomide (Mosun-Len) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL): US extension cohort from the Phase III CELESTIMO study

2025· article· en· W4417004071 on OpenAlexaff
Dahlia Sano, Nancy L. Bartlett, Elizabeth Budde, Brett T. Brinker, Rakhee Vaidya, Sunil Babu, Catherine Diefenbach, Chijioke Nze, Connie Ma, Andrea Knapp, Michelle Y. Doral, Vivian Chen, Paloma Hauser, Michael C. Wei, Anna Phillips, Natalie Surh, Adam Jan, Enkhtsetseg Purev, Nina Wagner‐Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLenalidomideFollicular lymphomaCohortAdverse effectRituximabCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsCytokine release syndromePhases of clinical research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: CELESTIMO (NCT04712097) is a randomized, multi-center, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Mosun-Len vs rituximab plus lenalidomide in patients with R/R FL. The non-randomized, single arm US extension (Arm C) of CELESTIMO further evaluates the efficacy and safety of Mosun-Len in US patients. We report the focused enrollment strategies implemented in Arm C, and preliminary efficacy and safety outcomes. Methods: To overcome enrollment barriers in the US for CELESTIMO, several targeted recruitment strategies were introduced. Key measures included the expansion of the US site footprint to include community sites and locations that were not historically participating in clinical trials; conducting a dedicated US-focused investigator meeting with comprehensive training; creating tailored materials based on investigator feedback; engaging investigators and site staff through 1:1 interaction; customized recruitment strategies for individual sites; and centralized support for patients and caregivers to ease participation challenges. In this non-randomized, single arm US extension, patients received intravenous mosunetuzumab plus oral lenalidomide, as described for Arm A by Nastoupil et al. 2022 (J Clin Oncol). Preliminary efficacy was evaluated by investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR), using Lugano criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Safety objectives included incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 and the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy grading criteria (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019), respectively. Results: At data cut-off (June 9, 2025), 54 patients were enrolled in the US extension Arm C of the CELESTIMO trial. Enrollment took place between September 2023 and December 2024, highlighting the success of the focused recruitment strategies, which streamlined the recruitment process and were instrumental in achieving rapid enrollment and demographic representation of the US population of patients with FL. Overall, 87.0% (47/54) of patients identified as White, 5.6% (3/54) as Asian, 3.7% (2/54) as African American, and 1.9% (1/54) as mixed race (American Indian/White); 22.2% (12/54) of patients identified as Hispanic or Latino. Median age was 62 years (range: 37–82); 59.3% (32/54) of patients were male; 40.4% (21/52) had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score of ≥3; 29.6% (16/54) had progressive disease within 24 months of first systemic therapy; 39.6% (19/48) were refractory to prior anti-CD20 therapy; and 17.0% (9/53) of patients had double-refractory disease. Median duration of follow-up was 12.7 months (range: 5–20). ORR was 96.3% (n=52/54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 90.3–100.0) and CRR was 87.0% (n=47/54; 95% CI 75.1–94.6). All patients experienced at least one AE (any grade) and 57.4% experienced a Grade (Gr) 3–4 AE. Serious AEs occurred in 27.8% of patients, and 11.1% and 18.5% of patients had an AE that led to mosunetuzumab and lenalidomide withdrawal, respectively. AEs related to mosunetuzumab and lenalidomide were reported in 88.9% and 92.6% of patients, respectively. One fatal mosunetuzumab-related AE (pneumonia) occurred. CRS was reported in 27.8% of patients (Gr 1, 22.2%; Gr 2, 3.7%; Gr 3, 1.9%); all CRS events resolved. Median duration of CRS was 4 days (range: 1–23). Neutropenia occurred in 40.7% of patients (Gr 1, 3.7%; Gr 2, 3.7%, Gr 3, 22.2%; Gr 4, 11.1%) and febrile neutropenia occurred in 3.7% of patients (all Gr 3). Infections were reported in 57.4% of patients (most common: COVID-19, 20.4%; sinusitis, 18.5%; upper respiratory tract infection, 16.7%) and were mainly Gr 2 (44.4%) in severity. Conclusions: The rapid and successful enrollment to the US extension of CELESTIMO may provide a roadmap for addressing challenges in clinical trial recruitment. Insights gained from this experience underscore the importance of patient-centric approaches for improving trial accessibility and ensuring demographic representation. Preliminary data support the potential for Mosun-Len as an effective and well-tolerated outpatient combination treatment for US patients with R/R FL. Continued efforts to address patient-, site-, and system-level barriers to trial participation are essential for advancing innovative therapies and improving outcomes for US patients with FL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→