Non-invasive classification & molecular subtyping of mature lymphoid neoplasms by cell-free DNA profiling
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Mature lymphoid neoplasms (MLN) are currently diagnosed by integrating histopathological, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular profiles of tumor tissue biopsies (Campo, Blood 2022; Alaggio, Leuk 2022). While genetic subtyping of DLBCL, based on mutational profiles and copy number alterations, has further advanced this classification, many cases remain unclassified (Wright, Cancer Cell 2020; Chapuy, Blood 2025). This highlights the need for additional diagnostic approaches, such as gene expression profiling (GEP) and cytogenetic methods, to capture significant biological heterogeneity. GEP has proven particularly valuable in identifying not only cell-of-origin (COO), but also high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCL), offering enhanced sensitivity and the ability to detect occult rearrangements using a “dark-zone signature” (DZsig, Ennishi, JCO 2018; Alduaij, Blood 2023). However, the required tissue biopsies for GEP are invasive, carry procedural risks, and may delay diagnosis. While multi-cancer early detection (MCED) liquid biopsy tests based on methylation can allow detection of diverse solid tumors, most cancers detected by MCED when screening otherwise healthy adults are MLNs (Schrag, Lancet 2023) that cannot currently be further resolved using these tests. To overcome these limitations, we explored plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a non-invasive alternative for classifying diverse MLNs, determining COO and genetic subtypes in DLBCL, identifying genetic subtypes in HL, and detecting HGBCL. Methods: We applied EPIC-Seq (Esfahani, Nat Biotech 2022) to infer tumor gene expression from cfDNA fragmentomic signals in blood plasma before therapy. We designed a targeted capture panel informed by prior lymphoid GEP studies (n=56 studies, >10,000 tumors), including B- and T-cell differentiation markers, canonical immunohistochemistry markers, and recurrent genomic mutations and fusions for tumor burden assessment via variant allele frequency (VAF). The final panel encompassed 1,986 transcription start sites from 1,676 genes and covered 2.6 MB of genomic space. We then profiled plasma cfDNA from 748 subjects, including 666 patients across 10 lymphoid neoplasms (BL, CLL, DLBCL, FL, HL, MCL, MM, PBMCL, PTCL, WM), along with 58 healthy controls and 24 subjects with Other non-lymphoid solid tumors (carcinomas of the lung, liver, and pancreas). Results: Recognizing the influence of tumor burden on inferred tumor gene expression from plasma cfDNA, we developed a machine learning model to predict tumor mutant variant allele fraction (VAF) from EPIC-Seq data and validated it against mutation-based tumor burden measurements (Pearson R=0.96). This established a low VAF background threshold distinguishing from healthy controls (1%), below which samples were excluded for classification purposes. We then trained a multi-histology classifier on 396 patients across 10 groups (BL, CLL, DLBCL, FL, HL, MCL, MM, PTCL, Healthy, Other). Independent validation on 169 held-out samples demonstrated high individual classification accuracies and an overall top 2 accuracy of 94%. Beyond histological classification, EPIC-Seq showed high discriminatory potential for molecular HL subtypes (H1/H2, Alig, Nature 2024; AUC>0.8, p<0.0001) and accurately identified DLBCL GCB vs ABC COO subtypes (AUC>0.8, p<0.001). For genetic subtyping of DLBCL (e.g. Wright, Cancer Cell 2020; Chapuy, Blood 2025), we trained a classifier on publicly available tumor RNA-Seq data and successfully applied it to our plasma EPIC-Seq data from DLBCL patients, observing a strong concordance between EPIC-Seq inferred molecular subtypes and LymphGen mutational classifications. Finally, we evaluated cell-free DZsig in 49 LBCL patients (28% harboring MYC+BCL2 double-hit by FISH), demonstrating significant discrimination between HGBCL-DH-BCL2 and DLBCL NOS (AUC=0.75, p=0.005). As expected, DZsig scores in BL, known to originate from the dark zone, did not significantly differ from HGBCL-DH-BCL2.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates clinical feasibility and high accuracy of EPIC-Seq-based cfDNA analysis for non-invasive classification and molecular subtyping of diverse mature lymphoid neoplasms. This approach effectively addresses clinically relevant diagnostic challenges, including COO determination, genetic subtyping in DLBCL and HL, identification of HGBCL-DH-BCL2, and other high risk LBCLs harboring dark-zone signature.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».