MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417010430 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-949

Danicopan add-on therapy demonstrates positive efficacy and safety outcomes in advanced age adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and clinically significant extravascular hemolysis: A sub-analysis of the phase 3 ALPHA trial

2025· article· en· W4417010430 sur OpenAlexaff
Austin Kulasekararaj, Morag Griffin, Robert A. Brodsky, Jun‐ichi Nishimura, Christopher J. Patriquin, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Wilma Barcellini, Anna Gayà, Yogesh Patel, Ying Tang, Gleb Filippov, Mohammed H. Mahdi, Flore Sicre-de-Fontbrune, Jong Wook Lee

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueComplement system in diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaEculizumabAdverse effectHemoglobinuriaPlaceboRandomized controlled trialClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare blood disorder characterized by intravascular hemolysis, thrombosis, and organ damage. Add-on therapy with danicopan, a first-in-class oral factor D inhibitor, has shown significant improvements to clinical outcomes in adult patients with ravulizumab- or eculizumab-treated PNH and clinically significant extravascular hemolysis (csEVH; defined as hemoglobin [Hb] <9.5 g/dL and absolute reticulocyte count [ARC] ≥120 × 109/L), shown by the pivotal phase 3 ALPHA trial (NCT04469465). However, there is limited evidence examining whether this translates to patients with advanced age (≥65 years). Objective To characterize the efficacy and safety of danicopan add-on therapy in patients with advanced age with PNH and csEVH receiving ravulizumab or eculizumab from the ALPHA trial. Methods This sub-analysis focused on the primary treatment period of the ALPHA trial, during which adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with PNH and csEVH with ≥6 months of ravulizumab or eculizumab treatment were randomized 2:1 to receive add-on danicopan or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Outcomes were evaluated by age at study enrollment (≥65 and <65 years) and included change from baseline in Hb concentration, ARC, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) score up to 12 weeks; the proportion of patients who were transfusion independent at 12 weeks; and the proportion of patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) during the 12-week period. Results In total, 86 patients were enrolled into ALPHA; 57 were randomized to add-on danicopan (59.6% female, 16 aged ≥65 years, 41 aged <65 years), and 29 were randomized to add-on PBO (69.0% female, 6 aged ≥65 years, 23 aged <65 years). Mean (standard deviation; SD) baseline clinical characteristics were similar between age groups in the danicopan arm (aged ≥65 vs <65 years: Hb concentration, 7.6 [0.9] g/dL vs 7.7 [1.0] g/dL; ARC, 216.0 [40.4] × 109/L vs 260.0 [109.8] × 109/L; FACIT-F, 36.0 [8.5] vs 33.2 [12.2]) and the PBO arm (aged ≥65 vs. <65 years: Hb concentration, 8.3 [0.8] g/dL vs 7.8 [0.1] g/dL; ARC, 201.1 [69.1] × 109/L vs 228.6 [125.7] × 109/L; FACIT-F, 38.3 [9.2] vs 29.9 [10.9]). In the danicopan arm, both age groups showed an increase in mean (SD) Hb concentration from baseline to week 1 (aged ≥65 years, 2.7 [1.0] g/dL; aged <65 years: 1.9 [1.0] g/dL), which was maintained in patients aged ≥65 years and improved in those aged <65 years through to week 12 (aged ≥65 years, 2.8 [1.7] g/dL, 50.0% with an increase ≥2.0 g/dL; aged <65 years: 3.1 [1.4] g/dL, 56.1% with an increase ≥2.0 g/dL). During this period, both age groups also demonstrated a meaningful reduction in mean (SD) ARC (aged ≥65 years, –51.2 [74.4] × 109/L; aged <65 years, –105.3 [97.7] × 109/L) and increases in FACIT-F score (aged ≥65 years, +4.9 [6.4]; aged <65 years, +9.4 [7.9]), which was more pronounced in patients aged <65 years. In comparison, there were no notable improvements in mean (SD) Hb concentration, ARC or FACIT-F from baseline to week 12 in the PBO arm (aged ≥65 vs <65 years: Hb concentration, 0.5 [0.6] g/dL vs 0.8 [0.9] g/dL; ARC, 9.0 [39.0] × 109/L vs 0.1 [54.2] × 109/L; FACIT-F, –4.0 [6.1] vs 4.6 [9.4]). In the danicopan arm, the proportion of patients who were transfusion independent at week 12 was similar between patients aged ≥65 and <65 years (75.0% vs 80.5%, respectively) and was higher compared with those in the PBO arm (30.4% vs 16.7%, respectively). The proportion of patients in the danicopan arm who experienced an AE during 12 weeks of add-on therapy was similar between patients aged ≥65 and <65 years (68.8% vs 78.0%, respectively). In both age groups, the proportion of patients experiencing an AE was lower in the PBO arm, particularly in those aged ≥65 years (50.0% vs 65.2%, respectively). ConclusionThis sub-analysis demonstrates that danicopan add-on to ravulizumab or eculizumab has a positive efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced age with PNH and csEVH. During 12 weeks of danicopan add-on therapy, these patients reported meaningful improvements in Hb concentration and ARC, while maintaining transfusion avoidance and a low rate of AEs. Overall, this analysis supports the use of danicopan add-on therapy in patients with advanced age with PNH and csEVH treated with ravulizumab or eculizumab, with no new safety signals.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,180
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,687

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetComplement system in diseasesTravaux en français237 207