MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417010430 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-949

Danicopan add-on therapy demonstrates positive efficacy and safety outcomes in advanced age adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and clinically significant extravascular hemolysis: A sub-analysis of the phase 3 ALPHA trial

2025· article· en· W4417010430 on OpenAlexaff
Austin Kulasekararaj, Morag Griffin, Robert A. Brodsky, Jun‐ichi Nishimura, Christopher J. Patriquin, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Wilma Barcellini, Anna Gayà, Yogesh Patel, Ying Tang, Gleb Filippov, Mohammed H. Mahdi, Flore Sicre-de-Fontbrune, Jong Wook Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaEculizumabAdverse effectHemoglobinuriaPlaceboRandomized controlled trialClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare blood disorder characterized by intravascular hemolysis, thrombosis, and organ damage. Add-on therapy with danicopan, a first-in-class oral factor D inhibitor, has shown significant improvements to clinical outcomes in adult patients with ravulizumab- or eculizumab-treated PNH and clinically significant extravascular hemolysis (csEVH; defined as hemoglobin [Hb] <9.5 g/dL and absolute reticulocyte count [ARC] ≥120 × 109/L), shown by the pivotal phase 3 ALPHA trial (NCT04469465). However, there is limited evidence examining whether this translates to patients with advanced age (≥65 years). Objective To characterize the efficacy and safety of danicopan add-on therapy in patients with advanced age with PNH and csEVH receiving ravulizumab or eculizumab from the ALPHA trial. Methods This sub-analysis focused on the primary treatment period of the ALPHA trial, during which adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with PNH and csEVH with ≥6 months of ravulizumab or eculizumab treatment were randomized 2:1 to receive add-on danicopan or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Outcomes were evaluated by age at study enrollment (≥65 and <65 years) and included change from baseline in Hb concentration, ARC, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) score up to 12 weeks; the proportion of patients who were transfusion independent at 12 weeks; and the proportion of patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) during the 12-week period. Results In total, 86 patients were enrolled into ALPHA; 57 were randomized to add-on danicopan (59.6% female, 16 aged ≥65 years, 41 aged <65 years), and 29 were randomized to add-on PBO (69.0% female, 6 aged ≥65 years, 23 aged <65 years). Mean (standard deviation; SD) baseline clinical characteristics were similar between age groups in the danicopan arm (aged ≥65 vs <65 years: Hb concentration, 7.6 [0.9] g/dL vs 7.7 [1.0] g/dL; ARC, 216.0 [40.4] × 109/L vs 260.0 [109.8] × 109/L; FACIT-F, 36.0 [8.5] vs 33.2 [12.2]) and the PBO arm (aged ≥65 vs. <65 years: Hb concentration, 8.3 [0.8] g/dL vs 7.8 [0.1] g/dL; ARC, 201.1 [69.1] × 109/L vs 228.6 [125.7] × 109/L; FACIT-F, 38.3 [9.2] vs 29.9 [10.9]). In the danicopan arm, both age groups showed an increase in mean (SD) Hb concentration from baseline to week 1 (aged ≥65 years, 2.7 [1.0] g/dL; aged <65 years: 1.9 [1.0] g/dL), which was maintained in patients aged ≥65 years and improved in those aged <65 years through to week 12 (aged ≥65 years, 2.8 [1.7] g/dL, 50.0% with an increase ≥2.0 g/dL; aged <65 years: 3.1 [1.4] g/dL, 56.1% with an increase ≥2.0 g/dL). During this period, both age groups also demonstrated a meaningful reduction in mean (SD) ARC (aged ≥65 years, –51.2 [74.4] × 109/L; aged <65 years, –105.3 [97.7] × 109/L) and increases in FACIT-F score (aged ≥65 years, +4.9 [6.4]; aged <65 years, +9.4 [7.9]), which was more pronounced in patients aged <65 years. In comparison, there were no notable improvements in mean (SD) Hb concentration, ARC or FACIT-F from baseline to week 12 in the PBO arm (aged ≥65 vs <65 years: Hb concentration, 0.5 [0.6] g/dL vs 0.8 [0.9] g/dL; ARC, 9.0 [39.0] × 109/L vs 0.1 [54.2] × 109/L; FACIT-F, –4.0 [6.1] vs 4.6 [9.4]). In the danicopan arm, the proportion of patients who were transfusion independent at week 12 was similar between patients aged ≥65 and <65 years (75.0% vs 80.5%, respectively) and was higher compared with those in the PBO arm (30.4% vs 16.7%, respectively). The proportion of patients in the danicopan arm who experienced an AE during 12 weeks of add-on therapy was similar between patients aged ≥65 and <65 years (68.8% vs 78.0%, respectively). In both age groups, the proportion of patients experiencing an AE was lower in the PBO arm, particularly in those aged ≥65 years (50.0% vs 65.2%, respectively). ConclusionThis sub-analysis demonstrates that danicopan add-on to ravulizumab or eculizumab has a positive efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced age with PNH and csEVH. During 12 weeks of danicopan add-on therapy, these patients reported meaningful improvements in Hb concentration and ARC, while maintaining transfusion avoidance and a low rate of AEs. Overall, this analysis supports the use of danicopan add-on therapy in patients with advanced age with PNH and csEVH treated with ravulizumab or eculizumab, with no new safety signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207