MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417012274 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3735

Fixed-duration intravenous mosunetuzumab plus polatuzumab vedotin combination therapy continues to demonstrate durable responses in patients with large B-cell lymphoma: 3-year follow-up from a Phase Ib/II study

2025· article· en· W4417012274 sur OpenAlexaff
Manali Kamdar, Julio C. Chávez, Adam J. Olszewski, Sarit Assouline, Izidore S. Lossos, Catherine Diefenbach, Dipenkumar Modi, Waleed Sabry, Seema Naik, Amitkumar Mehta, Sneha Makadia, Song Pham, Elicia Peneul, Hao Wu, Wahib S. Ead, Iris To, Dennis J. Houston, Connie Lee Batlevi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensRoche (Canada)Saskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of SaskatchewanMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClinical endpointFollicular lymphomaRefractory (planetary science)RegimenPhases of clinical researchSalvage therapyLymphomaCombination therapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Mosunetuzumab (Mosun), a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, combined with polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), a CD79b-directed antibody–drug conjugate, is an effective regimen for relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). The primary analysis of Mosun-Pola in a Phase Ib/II study (NCT03671018) demonstrated durable responses and manageable safety in patients (pts) with transplant-ineligible R/R LBCL (Budde et al. Nat Med 2023). We report 3-year follow-up efficacy and safety data, and subgroup analyses for high-risk pts, including those who experienced early relapse or were refractory to primary therapy, or were refractory to their last therapy or prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). Methods: Pts with R/R LBCL (diffuse [D] LBCL not otherwise specified, high-grade B-cell lymphoma [HGBCL], follicular lymphoma [FL] Grade 3b) who received ≥1 prior line of therapy (including an anti-CD20 antibody) were treated with Mosun-Pola in 21-day cycles. Pola (1.8mg/kg) was administered on Day (D) 1 of Cycles (C) 1–6. Mosun was administered with C1 step-up dosing: C1D1 (1mg), C1D8 (2mg), C1D15 (60mg), C2D1 (60mg), and 30mg on D1 of C3+. Pts with a complete response (CR) completed Mosun after C8; pts with stable disease or partial response at the end of C8 continued Mosun for a total of 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) by the Independent Review Committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included CR rate, duration of response (DOR), duration of CR (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: As of November 15, 2024, 98 pts were enrolled, of whom 85 (87%) were based in the US. The mean age was 68 (range: 20–88) and 29% were female (Budde et al. Nat Med 2023). Most pts (n=73, 74%) had DLBCL, 23 (23%) had HGBCL and 2 (2%) had FL Grade 3b. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range: 1–8); 43% of pts had ≥3 prior therapies and 37% had prior CAR-T. Most pts (77%) were refractory to their last prior therapy, 73% were refractory to or had early relapse after primary therapy, and 27% were refractory to CAR-T. Median follow-up was 38.5 months (range: 0–52). Overall, the IRC-assessed ORR and CR rate were 62% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52–72) and 50% (95% CI: 40–60), respectively. Median DOR was 43.7 months (95% CI: 16.2–not evaluable [NE]) and the 36-month DOR rate was 53% (95% CI: 39–68). Median DOCR was 43.7 months (95% CI: 21–NE; range: 0–46 months), and the 36-month DOCR rate was 58% (95% CI: 43–73). Median PFS was 14.1 months (95% CI: 8.8–29) and the 36-month PFS rate was 37% (95% CI: 26–49). Median OS was 26.9 months (95% CI: 15–NE) and the 36-month OS rate was 48% (95% CI: 38–58). Response rates were generally consistent across high-risk subgroups. In pts with early relapsed or primary refractory LBCL (n=72), ORR was 58% (95% CI: 46–70) and CR rate was 44% (95% CI: 33–57). In pts refractory to last prior therapy (n=75), ORR was 55% (95% CI: 43–66) and CR rate was 41% (95% CI: 30–53). The ORR and CR rate in pts with prior CAR-T (n=36) were 67% (95% CI: 49–81) and 50% (95% CI: 33–67), respectively. In pts refractory to CAR-T (n=26), the ORR was 58% (95% CI: 37–77) and CR rate was 42% (95% CI: 23–63). PFS and OS subgroup data will be presented. Safety data were consistent with previous analyses; no new cytokine release syndrome events were reported. Following the last data cutoff (July 6, 2023), 2 new adverse events (AE) were reported. Both were Grade 3 serious AEs (COVID-19 and influenza) and occurred in the same patient. Grade 3–5 serious infections occurred in 12 (12%) pts and included Grade 3 COVID-19/COVID-19 pneumonia (n=4), and sepsis (n=1), and Grade 5 COVID-19 pneumonia (n=2) and pneumonia (n=1). The median duration of infections was 16.5 days (n=68; range: 1–499). No additional Grade 5 AEs were reported. Biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of over 3 years, Mosun-Pola continued to show high, durable, and clinically meaningful responses in pts with highly refractory R/R LBCL, including pts with prior CAR T-cell therapy or primary refractory disease. At 3 years, 37% of pts remained free of progression, and 48% were alive. Consistent with previous analyses, the safety profile remained manageable. Mosun-Pola may be beneficial for transplant-ineligible pts, those with co-morbidities, or pts with limited access to or relapse after CAR-T.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,266 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→