MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417012274 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3735

Fixed-duration intravenous mosunetuzumab plus polatuzumab vedotin combination therapy continues to demonstrate durable responses in patients with large B-cell lymphoma: 3-year follow-up from a Phase Ib/II study

2025· article· en· W4417012274 on OpenAlexaff
Manali Kamdar, Julio C. Chávez, Adam J. Olszewski, Sarit Assouline, Izidore S. Lossos, Catherine Diefenbach, Dipenkumar Modi, Waleed Sabry, Seema Naik, Amitkumar Mehta, Sneha Makadia, Song Pham, Elicia Peneul, Hao Wu, Wahib S. Ead, Iris To, Dennis J. Houston, Connie Lee Batlevi

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)Saskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of SaskatchewanMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical endpointFollicular lymphomaRefractory (planetary science)RegimenPhases of clinical researchSalvage therapyLymphomaCombination therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Mosunetuzumab (Mosun), a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, combined with polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), a CD79b-directed antibody–drug conjugate, is an effective regimen for relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). The primary analysis of Mosun-Pola in a Phase Ib/II study (NCT03671018) demonstrated durable responses and manageable safety in patients (pts) with transplant-ineligible R/R LBCL (Budde et al. Nat Med 2023). We report 3-year follow-up efficacy and safety data, and subgroup analyses for high-risk pts, including those who experienced early relapse or were refractory to primary therapy, or were refractory to their last therapy or prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). Methods: Pts with R/R LBCL (diffuse [D] LBCL not otherwise specified, high-grade B-cell lymphoma [HGBCL], follicular lymphoma [FL] Grade 3b) who received ≥1 prior line of therapy (including an anti-CD20 antibody) were treated with Mosun-Pola in 21-day cycles. Pola (1.8mg/kg) was administered on Day (D) 1 of Cycles (C) 1–6. Mosun was administered with C1 step-up dosing: C1D1 (1mg), C1D8 (2mg), C1D15 (60mg), C2D1 (60mg), and 30mg on D1 of C3+. Pts with a complete response (CR) completed Mosun after C8; pts with stable disease or partial response at the end of C8 continued Mosun for a total of 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) by the Independent Review Committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included CR rate, duration of response (DOR), duration of CR (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: As of November 15, 2024, 98 pts were enrolled, of whom 85 (87%) were based in the US. The mean age was 68 (range: 20–88) and 29% were female (Budde et al. Nat Med 2023). Most pts (n=73, 74%) had DLBCL, 23 (23%) had HGBCL and 2 (2%) had FL Grade 3b. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range: 1–8); 43% of pts had ≥3 prior therapies and 37% had prior CAR-T. Most pts (77%) were refractory to their last prior therapy, 73% were refractory to or had early relapse after primary therapy, and 27% were refractory to CAR-T. Median follow-up was 38.5 months (range: 0–52). Overall, the IRC-assessed ORR and CR rate were 62% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52–72) and 50% (95% CI: 40–60), respectively. Median DOR was 43.7 months (95% CI: 16.2–not evaluable [NE]) and the 36-month DOR rate was 53% (95% CI: 39–68). Median DOCR was 43.7 months (95% CI: 21–NE; range: 0–46 months), and the 36-month DOCR rate was 58% (95% CI: 43–73). Median PFS was 14.1 months (95% CI: 8.8–29) and the 36-month PFS rate was 37% (95% CI: 26–49). Median OS was 26.9 months (95% CI: 15–NE) and the 36-month OS rate was 48% (95% CI: 38–58). Response rates were generally consistent across high-risk subgroups. In pts with early relapsed or primary refractory LBCL (n=72), ORR was 58% (95% CI: 46–70) and CR rate was 44% (95% CI: 33–57). In pts refractory to last prior therapy (n=75), ORR was 55% (95% CI: 43–66) and CR rate was 41% (95% CI: 30–53). The ORR and CR rate in pts with prior CAR-T (n=36) were 67% (95% CI: 49–81) and 50% (95% CI: 33–67), respectively. In pts refractory to CAR-T (n=26), the ORR was 58% (95% CI: 37–77) and CR rate was 42% (95% CI: 23–63). PFS and OS subgroup data will be presented. Safety data were consistent with previous analyses; no new cytokine release syndrome events were reported. Following the last data cutoff (July 6, 2023), 2 new adverse events (AE) were reported. Both were Grade 3 serious AEs (COVID-19 and influenza) and occurred in the same patient. Grade 3–5 serious infections occurred in 12 (12%) pts and included Grade 3 COVID-19/COVID-19 pneumonia (n=4), and sepsis (n=1), and Grade 5 COVID-19 pneumonia (n=2) and pneumonia (n=1). The median duration of infections was 16.5 days (n=68; range: 1–499). No additional Grade 5 AEs were reported. Biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of over 3 years, Mosun-Pola continued to show high, durable, and clinically meaningful responses in pts with highly refractory R/R LBCL, including pts with prior CAR T-cell therapy or primary refractory disease. At 3 years, 37% of pts remained free of progression, and 48% were alive. Consistent with previous analyses, the safety profile remained manageable. Mosun-Pola may be beneficial for transplant-ineligible pts, those with co-morbidities, or pts with limited access to or relapse after CAR-T.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→