MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417014679 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3921

Spatial proteomics of the bone marrow reveals distinct Tumor–Immune niches in smoldering and relapsed myeloma and their remodeling in response to bispecific antibody and CAR-T therapy

2025· article· en· W4417014679 sur OpenAlexaff
David M. Cordas dos Santos, Kane Foster, Daniel Heilpern-Mallory, Sophia Schroeder, Yoshinobu Konishi, Jacqueline Perry, Sophie Magidson, Diego Vieyra, Rocío Montes de, Daniel Zangrando, Nina J. Lane, Adam S. Sperling, Eric L. Smith, Jacob P. Laubach, Elizabeth O’Donnell, Nikhil C. Munshi, Kenneth C. Anderson, Shonali Midha, Gad Getz, Omar Nadeem, Irene M. Ghobrial

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensIntegrity Testing Laboratory (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMultiple myelomaBone marrowHematologic malignancyTumor microenvironmentImmunotherapyImmunophenotypingFlow cytometry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION T cell–redirecting therapies, including CAR T cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), have transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and are being explored in earlier stages, including high-risk smoldering myeloma (SMM). Emerging evidence suggests spatial tissue organization modulates immunotherapy outcomes. Here, we used spatial proteomics to (1) map the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment across disease stages, (2) assess associations between baseline spatial features and response, and (3) characterize longitudinal remodeling in response to immunotherapy. METHODS We analyzed 121 BM biopsies from 47 patients with high-risk SMM treated with teclistamab or cilta-cel, and 19 patients with RRMM treated with BsAbs (14 teclistamab, 2 elranatamab, 3 talquetamab) between 2022–2024. Thirty-six patients had ≥1 post-treatment biopsy. A total of 196 regions of interest (ROIs) were profiled using a 32-marker imaging mass cytometry (IMC) panel (Hyperion XTi, Standard BioTools). Cell segmentation was performed with cellpose-sam. Marker-based annotation identified 27 phenotypes across 1,116,993 single cells. Cellular neighborhoods were defined as the 10 μm microenvironment around each cell. Spatial co-localization was evaluated via permutation testing. P values were FDR-adjusted. RESULTS SMM and RRMM cohorts showed expected differences: all RRMM patients had prior BCMA therapy, 42% had extramedullary disease, and median prior lines were five (range 2–13); SMM patients were mainly treatment-naïve. High-risk cytogenetics were similarly distributed (p=0.7). PC infiltration in ROIs showed a moderate correlation with pathologist estimates based on whole-slide review (R=0.61, p<0.001). In contrast, intra-sample consistency across ROIs was high (R=0.91–1.0). Regarding overall composition, SMM samples exhibited higher PC infiltration (q=0.0008) but fewer proliferating (Ki67⁺) PCs (q<0.001). T cells were more abundant in SMM (q=0.03), whereas RRMM was enriched for activated (HLA-DR⁺) and central memory (CD45RO⁺CCR7⁺) CD4⁺ T cells (Tact, Tcm; both q<0.001), as well as exhausted (PD1⁺TIM3⁺; Tex, q<0.001) and effector memory (CD45RO⁺; Tem, q=0.005) CD8⁺ T cells—indicative of an immunosuppressed T cell milieu. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) were similar between groups (q=0.3). A cellular neighborhood clustering approach at baseline revealed two PC neighborhoods in SMM (35% and 23% PCs) versus one in RRMM (44% PCs). Most non-PC cell types were similarly distributed across SMM PC neighborhoods. However, one PC neighborhood was enriched in T cells (16%), whereas the second (8%) possessed T cell levels similar to those of the RRMM PC neighborhood (9%). The T cell–enriched SMM PC neighborhood showed significantly higher levels of Tex and Tregs (both q<0.001), suggesting localized tumor-T cell immune processes unique to the SMM microenvironment. To assess treatment-induced BM changes, we analyzed matched samples at 6 months (n=20) and 12 months (n=5). PC proportions declined rapidly, while T cells (6m q=0.12, 12m q=0.06) and Granzyme B⁺ cells (6m q=0.06, 12m q=0.04) increased over time. Within CD4⁺ T cells, Tact and Tcm trended upward, whereas Tregs declined (q=0.15). CD8⁺ T cells were more dynamic, with transient Tem and Tex increases (both q=0.005). Additionally, macrophages showed a transient rise (q=0.05). Subsequently, analyzing spatial cell-cell interactions, we observed a decline between PCs and CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ memory T cell interactions over time. PC–CD8⁺ Tex interactions initially decreased but rebounded by 12 months, while T cell–DC interactions followed the opposite pattern, increasing early and then declining (q<0.05). These temporal patterns indicate an early phase of BsAb-driven immune remodeling, which appears to subside by one year, likely due to reduced tumor burden and limited ongoing T cell engagement. Finally, to assess whether baseline spatial interaction scores predict treatment response, we stratified RRMM patients by median PC–Treg and PC–Tex interaction levels. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significantly shorter progression-free survival in patients with enriched PC–immune interactions (Treg: p=0.003; Tex: p=0.006).CONCLUSIONS This study provides a framework for leveraging spatial profiling to dissect the bone marrow microenvironment in myeloma across disease stages and proposes a model in which spatial PC–T cell interactions inform the efficacy of T cell–redirecting therapies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→