MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417014679 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3921

Spatial proteomics of the bone marrow reveals distinct Tumor–Immune niches in smoldering and relapsed myeloma and their remodeling in response to bispecific antibody and CAR-T therapy

2025· article· en· W4417014679 on OpenAlexaff
David M. Cordas dos Santos, Kane Foster, Daniel Heilpern-Mallory, Sophia Schroeder, Yoshinobu Konishi, Jacqueline Perry, Sophie Magidson, Diego Vieyra, Rocío Montes de, Daniel Zangrando, Nina J. Lane, Adam S. Sperling, Eric L. Smith, Jacob P. Laubach, Elizabeth O’Donnell, Nikhil C. Munshi, Kenneth C. Anderson, Shonali Midha, Gad Getz, Omar Nadeem, Irene M. Ghobrial

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsIntegrity Testing Laboratory (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple myelomaBone marrowHematologic malignancyTumor microenvironmentImmunotherapyImmunophenotypingFlow cytometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION T cell–redirecting therapies, including CAR T cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), have transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and are being explored in earlier stages, including high-risk smoldering myeloma (SMM). Emerging evidence suggests spatial tissue organization modulates immunotherapy outcomes. Here, we used spatial proteomics to (1) map the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment across disease stages, (2) assess associations between baseline spatial features and response, and (3) characterize longitudinal remodeling in response to immunotherapy. METHODS We analyzed 121 BM biopsies from 47 patients with high-risk SMM treated with teclistamab or cilta-cel, and 19 patients with RRMM treated with BsAbs (14 teclistamab, 2 elranatamab, 3 talquetamab) between 2022–2024. Thirty-six patients had ≥1 post-treatment biopsy. A total of 196 regions of interest (ROIs) were profiled using a 32-marker imaging mass cytometry (IMC) panel (Hyperion XTi, Standard BioTools). Cell segmentation was performed with cellpose-sam. Marker-based annotation identified 27 phenotypes across 1,116,993 single cells. Cellular neighborhoods were defined as the 10 μm microenvironment around each cell. Spatial co-localization was evaluated via permutation testing. P values were FDR-adjusted. RESULTS SMM and RRMM cohorts showed expected differences: all RRMM patients had prior BCMA therapy, 42% had extramedullary disease, and median prior lines were five (range 2–13); SMM patients were mainly treatment-naïve. High-risk cytogenetics were similarly distributed (p=0.7). PC infiltration in ROIs showed a moderate correlation with pathologist estimates based on whole-slide review (R=0.61, p<0.001). In contrast, intra-sample consistency across ROIs was high (R=0.91–1.0). Regarding overall composition, SMM samples exhibited higher PC infiltration (q=0.0008) but fewer proliferating (Ki67⁺) PCs (q<0.001). T cells were more abundant in SMM (q=0.03), whereas RRMM was enriched for activated (HLA-DR⁺) and central memory (CD45RO⁺CCR7⁺) CD4⁺ T cells (Tact, Tcm; both q<0.001), as well as exhausted (PD1⁺TIM3⁺; Tex, q<0.001) and effector memory (CD45RO⁺; Tem, q=0.005) CD8⁺ T cells—indicative of an immunosuppressed T cell milieu. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) were similar between groups (q=0.3). A cellular neighborhood clustering approach at baseline revealed two PC neighborhoods in SMM (35% and 23% PCs) versus one in RRMM (44% PCs). Most non-PC cell types were similarly distributed across SMM PC neighborhoods. However, one PC neighborhood was enriched in T cells (16%), whereas the second (8%) possessed T cell levels similar to those of the RRMM PC neighborhood (9%). The T cell–enriched SMM PC neighborhood showed significantly higher levels of Tex and Tregs (both q<0.001), suggesting localized tumor-T cell immune processes unique to the SMM microenvironment. To assess treatment-induced BM changes, we analyzed matched samples at 6 months (n=20) and 12 months (n=5). PC proportions declined rapidly, while T cells (6m q=0.12, 12m q=0.06) and Granzyme B⁺ cells (6m q=0.06, 12m q=0.04) increased over time. Within CD4⁺ T cells, Tact and Tcm trended upward, whereas Tregs declined (q=0.15). CD8⁺ T cells were more dynamic, with transient Tem and Tex increases (both q=0.005). Additionally, macrophages showed a transient rise (q=0.05). Subsequently, analyzing spatial cell-cell interactions, we observed a decline between PCs and CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ memory T cell interactions over time. PC–CD8⁺ Tex interactions initially decreased but rebounded by 12 months, while T cell–DC interactions followed the opposite pattern, increasing early and then declining (q<0.05). These temporal patterns indicate an early phase of BsAb-driven immune remodeling, which appears to subside by one year, likely due to reduced tumor burden and limited ongoing T cell engagement. Finally, to assess whether baseline spatial interaction scores predict treatment response, we stratified RRMM patients by median PC–Treg and PC–Tex interaction levels. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significantly shorter progression-free survival in patients with enriched PC–immune interactions (Treg: p=0.003; Tex: p=0.006).CONCLUSIONS This study provides a framework for leveraging spatial profiling to dissect the bone marrow microenvironment in myeloma across disease stages and proposes a model in which spatial PC–T cell interactions inform the efficacy of T cell–redirecting therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→