MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417014954 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-7547

An open-label rollover study to assess the long-term safety of ixazomib

2025· article· en· W4417014954 sur OpenAlexaff
Sebastian Grosicki, Markus Hansson, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos, Tadao Ishida, Vishal Kukreti, Dok Hyun Yoon, Wee Joo Chng, Oliver Bechter, Xuejun Peng, Paul Richardson

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIxazomibAdverse effectCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsProteasome inhibitorClinical endpoint

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Long-term parenteral proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based therapy can prove challenging due to the burden of administration. Ixazomib, an oral PI, allows prolonged PI-based therapy, whilst maintaining a tolerable safety profile in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma. Ixazomib has also been studied in pts with amyloidosis and lymphoma. The purpose of this study was to continue to provide ixazomib with/without other combinational study drugs to pts who had previously received and tolerated treatment for the above indications, and to evaluate the long-term safety profile of ixazomib. Methods: This was an open-label, multicenter, rollover study (NCT02924272). Pts who had received and tolerated ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma, amyloidosis, or lymphoma in a prior study, and who had no further means to access the study treatment, but in the investigator's opinion could benefit from continued therapy, were eligible for inclusion. Pts entered the study on the same ixazomib dose that they were receiving at the time of rollover from their prior study, or according to the required dose modification from their prior study. The primary endpoint was safety of ixazomib as assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 27.0; TEAE severity was summarized using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (AEs), version 5.0. All results are reported descriptively; no statistical testing was conducted. Results: Between Dec 2016 and Jan 2022, a total of 32 pts were enrolled at 19 centers across 10 countries. Overall, 23 pts (71.9%) received ixazomib monotherapy and 9 (28.1%) received ixazomib in combination with one or more of dexamethasone, lenalidomide, or cyclophosphamide. The median (range) age was 74 (47–84) years and half of the pts were male. A higher proportion of pts receiving ixazomib monotherapy were aged ≥75 years (60.9%) compared with pts receiving ixazomib in combination (11.1%). At the data cut-off date (Jul 2024), all pts had discontinued study treatment. The most common reason for discontinuation was progressive disease (n=19; 59.4%). Other reasons were: study terminated by the sponsor (n=5; 15.6%); AEs (n=3; 9.4%); withdrawal by the pt (n=2; 6.3%); and clinical deterioration, death, or other (n=1 each; 3.1%). The median (range) number of treatment cycles with ixazomib (for the rollover period) was 25.5 (1–120) cycles (monotherapy: 25.0 [1–120] cycles; combination: 26.0 [2–85] cycles). The median (range) treatment duration was 718.5 (15–2587) days (monotherapy: 687.0 [15–2587] days; combination: 841.0 [36–2381] days). Median (range) dose taken (rollover period) was 245.7 (12.0–1126.0) mg (monotherapy: 276.0 [12.0–1126.0] mg; combination: 220.0 [12.0–996.0] mg). Among pts who received ixazomib monotherapy, 4 (17.4%) had a dose reduction and 3 (13.0%) had a dose increase; no pts who received ixazomib in combination had an ixazomib dose modification. Overall, 22 pts (68.8%) experienced ≥1 TEAE (monotherapy: 65.2%; combination: 77.8%). TEAEs that occurred in ≥10% of pts overall were: pneumonia (n=6; 18.8%); upper respiratory tract infection (n=6; 18.8%); anemia (n=4; 12.5%); and hypertension (n=4; 12.5%). Eighteen pts (56.3%) experienced a grade ≥3 TEAE (monotherapy: 56.5%; combination: 55.6%); these were considered treatment-related in 6 pts (18.8%). Sixteen pts (50.0%) experienced ≥1 serious AE (monotherapy: 52.2%; combination: 44.4%). In total, 2 pts (8.7%) who received ixazomib monotherapy experienced grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy. Four pts (12.5%) experienced ≥1 new primary malignancy (monotherapy: 13.0%; combination: 11.1%). One pt (4.3%) who received ixazomib monotherapy died during the study due to a TEAE (craniocerebral injury); the event was not considered to be related to study treatment. Conclusion: No evidence of cumulative or long-term/late-onset toxicity was observed when ixazomib was continued as monotherapy or in combination with dexamethasone, lenalidomide, or cyclophosphamide. These data support the overall safety profile of ixazomib, indicating that ixazomib as monotherapy and ixazomib in combination remain well-tolerated in the long-term after initial treatment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,073
Tête enseignante GPT0,413
Écart entre enseignants0,340 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→