MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417016977 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3315

Identification of XPO1 interactors and modulation by selinexor in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

2025· article· en· W4417016977 sur OpenAlexaff
Kyla L. Trkulja, Will Tong, Daisy Tran, Meng Li, Jonathan St‐Germain, Faith Au Yeung, Evelyn Teh, Susanne Penny, Brian Raught, Devanand M. Pinto, Armand Keating, John Kuruvilla, Rob C. Laister

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueNuclear Structure and Function
Établissements canadiensNational Research Council CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiotinylationDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLymphomaProteomicsVenetoclaxMitochondrionBiotinIdentification (biology)Cell

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients commonly have poor outcomes, highlighting the need for novel treatment regimens. Selinexor, an orally-available inhibitor of nuclear export via Exportin-1 (XPO1) is active in R/R DLBCL, but knowledge gaps in understanding how XPO1 drives DLBCL are limiting our ability to properly select patients that may benefit from selinexor and design effective combinations. Specifically, large-scale proteomics studies identifying XPO1 cargo molecules in DLBCL are lacking. Additionally, selinexor's mechanism of action in DLBCL is not fully understood. As such, we aimed to identify XPO1 interactors in DLBCL, to better characterize the repertoire of XPO1 cargo molecules in this lymphoma subtype. In addition, to determine how selinexor mediates downstream activity following XPO1 inhibition, we conducted a mass spectrometry based analysis to delineate selinexor-mediated changes to the mitochondrial proteome. Methods XPO1 interactors were identified using a proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID) (Sears et al., 2019) assay in DLBCL cell lines. Cells were treated with 0.5mM selinexor or DMSO for 24 hours, followed by the addition of 50mM biotin. Biotinylated proteins were isolated using streptavidin conjugated beads and identified using mass spectrometry. To determine selinexor mediated changes to the mitochondrial proteome, cells underwent the treatment conditions described above and were then subjected to mitochondrial enrichment prior to proteomic analysis via mass spectrometry. To identify putative XPO1 cargo molecules, protein sequences were analyzed using the LocNES nuclear export sequence (NES) algorithm to locate canonical XPO1 binding sequences (Xu et al., 2014). Results The BioID experiment identified 2766 unique peptides, which, once adjusted for control interactions, found 45 proteins as significant (BFDR<0.1) XPO1 interactors. Interacting proteins included Ran binding protein 2 (RanBP2), as well as 13 proteins of the nuclear pore complex (NPC), the conduit that allows XPO1 to shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm. Of interest was NUP88, which promotes NFkB activity and is overexpressed in several cancers (Singh et al., 2023), as well as NUP98, which assists with nuclear export of mRNA via interactions with its export factor Rae1 (Lin et al., 2018) and is dysregulated in several hematological malignancies (Michmerhuizen et al., 2020). We found that, in the presence of selinexor, increased biotinylation of NPC subunits was observed, indicating that XPO1's relative interactions with the NPC may increase with selinexor. This may be interpreted as the ability of the XPO1 cycle to continue with selinexor bound to the NES binding pocket, and may be independent of cargo protein binding. Similarly, selinexor treatment resulted in a decreased abundance of 61 mitochondrial proteins. Proteins relevant to DLBCL metabolism were identified and discussed previously (Trkulja et al., 2024). Of these proteins, we found a decrease in the mitochondrial levels of ORC1, which is involved in initiating the DNA replication and whose nuclear export is required for elongation to proceed. DNA replication proteins such DNA helicase RECQL4 have been found to shuttle to the mitochondria to aid in mtDNA maintenance (Lionaki et al., 2016), highlighting a novel role for such targets. ORC1 was significantly decreased in the mitochondria of selinexor-treated cells, suggesting its nuclear export is inhibited which may impact DNA elongation and cell division. The peptide sequence of ORC1 was found to contain a potential NES, indicating that it may be a novel XPO1 cargo protein modulated by selinexor in DLBCL. We confirmed that selinexor modulates the cell cycle and show that cell cycle arrest occurs at 24hrs following treatment with the drug even in p53 null DLBCL cell lines. Conclusion XPO1 interacts with several proteins in the NPC, even in the presence of selinexor, suggesting that that the XPO1 cycle still occurs when interactions with cargo proteins are blocked. Furthermore, selinexor reduced the extra-nuclear abundance ORC1, whose export is required for DNA elongation and cell cycle progression. This describes a potential p53-independent mechanism of cell cycle arrest mediated by selinexor, providing an additional mechanism of action by which XPO1 modulates the cell cycle.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,076
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,180

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,002
Tête enseignante GPT0,202
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetNuclear Structure and FunctionTravaux en français237 207