MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417020824 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-907

Safety and efficacy of bromodomain and extra-terminal protein inhibitor INCB057643 monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory myelofibrosis and other advanced myeloid neoplasms: A phase 1 study

2024· article· en· W4417020824 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Établissements canadiensJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityBell (Canada)Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMyelofibrosisBone marrowPhases of clinical researchMyeloproliferative neoplasmAnemiaClinical endpointBromodomainRefractory (planetary science)MyeloidHypomethylating agent

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that regulate expression of oncoproteins (such as NF-κB, c-Myc, and members of the BCL-2 family) involved in the pathophysiology of hematologic malignancies, including myelofibrosis (MF). The BET inhibitor INCB057643 has been shown to reduce levels of various pro-inflammatory cytokines, disease burden, and bone marrow fibrosis in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) models. Methods:This analysis of an ongoing phase 1, open-label, 3+3 dose-escalation/expansion study (NCT04279847) is evaluating INCB057643 monotherapy (during dose escalation: starting dose 4 mg→12 mg once daily [qd]; during dose expansion: starting dose 6 mg qd or 10 mg qd given continuously) in adults with relapsed/refractory MF, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or MDS/MPN overlap syndrome. The INCB057643 starting dose for each patient (pt) was selected based on their baseline platelet count, and intra-pt dose upward titration was allowed based on protocol-defined criteria (up to 10 mg qd). The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints include spleen volume response (≥35% reduction from baseline [SVR35] at Wk24), symptom response (≥50% reduction from baseline in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [TSS50] at Wk24), and anemia response (sustained hemoglobin increase ≥1.5 g/dL [if transfusion independent (TI) at baseline] or TI [if dependent (TD) at baseline] for ≥12 wk). Histopathologic bone marrow assessments were performed for megakaryocytes (CD61+) and erythroid precursors (CD71+). Bone marrow response was defined as reduced megakaryocytes and increased erythroid precursors from baseline based on gross analysis of cell counts. Plasma proteomic analysis was performed to assess cytokine levels and disease biomarkers. Results:As of March 17, 2025,18 pts (MF, n=13; MDS or MDS/MPN, n=5; 2 ongoing) were treated in dose escalation, and 20 with MF were treated in dose expansion with INCB057643 doses of 6 or 10 mg qd (13 ongoing). Median (range) INCB057643 exposure in pts with MF was 195.5 (15–1001) days for dose escalation and 151.0 (14–530) days in dose expansion. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was thrombocytopenia (45%, n=17/38; grade ≥3: 26%, n=10). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 68% (n=26/38) of pts, and serious TEAEs occurred in 34% (n=13/38; 1 [3%] was considered related to treatment). Gastrointestinal (39% [n=15/38]) and hepatic (hyperbilirubinemia, 5% [n=2/38]; alanine aminotransferase increased, 5% [n=2/38]; aspartate aminotransferase increased, 3% [n=1/38]) TEAEs related to INCB057643 treatment were uncommon and all grade 1/2. No treatment-related fatal events were observed. There were 2 dose-limiting toxicities, both in the 12-mg dose cohort (thrombocytopenia and hyperbilirubinemia). Leukemic transformation occurred in 2 pts (pt with MDS/MPN in the 4-mg dose cohort; pt with MDS in the 10-mg dose cohort). Wk24 SVR35 was achieved by 4/26 (15%) evaluable pts with MF overall, including 4/9 (44%) receiving INCB057643 at a dose ≥10 mg. SVR35 as best overall response (BOR) at any time was achieved by 4/30 (13%) pts. SVR25 at Wk24 was reached by 7/26 (27%) pts, and 10/30 (33%) pts had a BOR of SVR25. TSS50 was achieved by 8/23 (35%) evaluable pts at Wk24, including 5/9 (56%) receiving INCB057643 at a dose ≥10 mg. TSS50 and TSS30 as BOR was achieved by 14/28 (50%) and 22/28 (79%) pts, respectively. Durable anemia response lasting ≥12 wk was observed in 9/31 (29%) evaluable pts with MF, MDS/MPN, or MDS. TI was achieved by 2/4 (50%) pts who were TD at baseline (both with MF). Bone marrow response was observed at doses ≥6 mg qd, with the best response recorded at 10 mg qd. Maximal reduction in disease-specific plasma proteomic markers, including proinflammatory cytokines, was observed at the 10-mg qd dose. Conclusions:INCB057643 monotherapy was generally well tolerated on a continuous dosing schedule, with few treatment-related serious TEAEs and no treatment-related fatal events. Improvement in spleen size, marked improvement in symptom burden, and anemia response were observed with monotherapy. Dose expansion is ongoing for the 6- and 10-mg INCB057643 dose cohorts in pts with MF. A phase 3 study is being initiated to investigate INCB057643 monotherapy in pts with advanced MF following JAK inhibitor treatment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetProtein Degradation and InhibitorsTravaux en français237 207