Tumor flare pain reaction during teclistamab step-up dosing with tocilizumab prophylaxis: An underrecognized toxicity in the outpatient setting
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Teclistamab is a BCMA-directed bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, despite the deep and durable response rates achieved, concerns remain regarding the acute toxicity profile, particularly the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Interestingly, additional toxicities have been reported with teclistamab,notably bone pain, which occurred in 17.6% of patients in the MajesTEC-1 trial (grade ≥ 3: 3.6%). We observed a high frequency of severe bone pain in our cohort of patients treated with teclistamab, particularly during the step-up dosing phase. This raised concerns about a tumor flare pain reaction. Thus, this study aimed to assess the safety of outpatient teclistamab administration with tocilizumab prophylaxis during the step-up dosing phase. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with RRMM who completed cycle 1 of teclistamab therapy initiated in an outpatient setting. All patients received tocilizumab prophylaxis (8mg/kg) at cycle 1, day 1, with an accelerated step-up dosing at day 1, day 3, and day 5, followed by a weekly dose. Other premedications consisted of dexamethasone (16 mg), acetaminophen (975 mg) and cetirizine (10 mg) for the first three doses. To receive outpatient teclistamab step-up dosing, patients were required to stay within 60 minutes of the hospital and have access to a 24-hour caregiver support. During the first 7 days, subjects were contacted by telephone or videoconference 4 times daily. CRS and ICANS were graded according to ASTCT guidelines. Tumor flare pain reaction was described as acute and severe bone pain without evidence of progressive disease or pseudo-progression. Results: Between July 2023 and July 2025, 34 subjects received at least five doses of teclistamab. Median age was 70 years (range 31-91), 53% were male, and 41% had extramedullary disease. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3. The overall response rate of the global cohort was 74%. Adverse events included CRS in 9% and ICANS in 3% of patients, all grade 1. Two patients received dexamethasone and one other patient received tocilizumab for the management of CRS. Additionally, one patient required dexamethasone for ICANS management. No patients required hospitalization for CRS or ICANS management. Moreover, 6 patients (18%) presented with tumor flare pain reaction, and two of them required hospitalization for symptom management. All of whom received opioid analgesia, and all experienced rapid relief following dexamethasone administration. Two patients’ PET-CT showed moderate to high FDG uptake in the axial and proximal appendicular skeleton without corresponding lesions on CT or biological signs of progression. For the other four patients, only one imaging study (MRI or CT scan) showed pseudo-progression. For three patients, a broad cytokine panel was done during the pain episode, cytokine analysis revealed that most values were within normal limits, except for IL-2 (approximately twice above normal), soluble IL-2 receptor (1.5 to 3 times above the upper limit of normal), IL-10 (25 to 50 times above normal), and IL-6 (>100 times above normal). Conclusions: Our results support that outpatient administration with tocilizumab prophylaxis is a safe and feasible option for teclistamab step-up dosing. Prophylactic use of tocilizumab reduces both CRS incidence and severity with a very low rate of admission. Tumor flare pain reaction seems to be an under-recognized yet clinically significant adverse event occurring during teclistamab step-up dosing, often presenting as acute and severe bone pain with or without pseudo-progression. Tocilizumab may block the classical IL-6 signaling pathway while paradoxically enhancing a trans-signaling pathway, activating sensory neurons via GP130 and promoting pain through the JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Though speculative, this hypothesis has not been reported previously in studies evaluating prophylactic tocilizumab and warrants further investigation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».