MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417021106 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-5794

Tumor flare pain reaction during teclistamab step-up dosing with tocilizumab prophylaxis: An underrecognized toxicity in the outpatient setting

2025· article· en· W4417021106 on OpenAlexaff
Gaspard Jadot, Richard Leblanc, Rayan Kaedbey, Imran Ahmad, Jean Roy, Olivier Veilleux, Anne Couture, Louis Laflamme, Nancy Dorneval, Karim Benkirane, Stéphanie Thiant, Jean‐Sébastien Claveau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDosingTocilizumabAcetaminophenToxicityAdverse effectPegfilgrastimBone painNeutropenia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Teclistamab is a BCMA-directed bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, despite the deep and durable response rates achieved, concerns remain regarding the acute toxicity profile, particularly the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Interestingly, additional toxicities have been reported with teclistamab,notably bone pain, which occurred in 17.6% of patients in the MajesTEC-1 trial (grade ≥ 3: 3.6%). We observed a high frequency of severe bone pain in our cohort of patients treated with teclistamab, particularly during the step-up dosing phase. This raised concerns about a tumor flare pain reaction. Thus, this study aimed to assess the safety of outpatient teclistamab administration with tocilizumab prophylaxis during the step-up dosing phase. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with RRMM who completed cycle 1 of teclistamab therapy initiated in an outpatient setting. All patients received tocilizumab prophylaxis (8mg/kg) at cycle 1, day 1, with an accelerated step-up dosing at day 1, day 3, and day 5, followed by a weekly dose. Other premedications consisted of dexamethasone (16 mg), acetaminophen (975 mg) and cetirizine (10 mg) for the first three doses. To receive outpatient teclistamab step-up dosing, patients were required to stay within 60 minutes of the hospital and have access to a 24-hour caregiver support. During the first 7 days, subjects were contacted by telephone or videoconference 4 times daily. CRS and ICANS were graded according to ASTCT guidelines. Tumor flare pain reaction was described as acute and severe bone pain without evidence of progressive disease or pseudo-progression. Results: Between July 2023 and July 2025, 34 subjects received at least five doses of teclistamab. Median age was 70 years (range 31-91), 53% were male, and 41% had extramedullary disease. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3. The overall response rate of the global cohort was 74%. Adverse events included CRS in 9% and ICANS in 3% of patients, all grade 1. Two patients received dexamethasone and one other patient received tocilizumab for the management of CRS. Additionally, one patient required dexamethasone for ICANS management. No patients required hospitalization for CRS or ICANS management. Moreover, 6 patients (18%) presented with tumor flare pain reaction, and two of them required hospitalization for symptom management. All of whom received opioid analgesia, and all experienced rapid relief following dexamethasone administration. Two patients’ PET-CT showed moderate to high FDG uptake in the axial and proximal appendicular skeleton without corresponding lesions on CT or biological signs of progression. For the other four patients, only one imaging study (MRI or CT scan) showed pseudo-progression. For three patients, a broad cytokine panel was done during the pain episode, cytokine analysis revealed that most values were within normal limits, except for IL-2 (approximately twice above normal), soluble IL-2 receptor (1.5 to 3 times above the upper limit of normal), IL-10 (25 to 50 times above normal), and IL-6 (>100 times above normal). Conclusions: Our results support that outpatient administration with tocilizumab prophylaxis is a safe and feasible option for teclistamab step-up dosing. Prophylactic use of tocilizumab reduces both CRS incidence and severity with a very low rate of admission. Tumor flare pain reaction seems to be an under-recognized yet clinically significant adverse event occurring during teclistamab step-up dosing, often presenting as acute and severe bone pain with or without pseudo-progression. Tocilizumab may block the classical IL-6 signaling pathway while paradoxically enhancing a trans-signaling pathway, activating sensory neurons via GP130 and promoting pain through the JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Though speculative, this hypothesis has not been reported previously in studies evaluating prophylactic tocilizumab and warrants further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→