Paired-Sample and Pathway-Anchored MLOps Framework for Robust Transcriptomic Machine Learning in Small Cohorts: Model Classification Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Approximately 90% of the 65,000 human diseases are infrequent, collectively affecting ~400 million people, substantially limiting cohort accrual. This low prevalence constrains the development of robust transcriptome-based machine learning (ML) classifiers. Standard data-driven classifiers typically require cohorts of more than 100 participants per group to achieve clinical accuracy while managing high-dimensional input (~25,000 transcripts). These requirements are infeasible for microcohorts of ~20 individuals, where overfitting becomes pervasive. Objective: To overcome these constraints, we developed a classification method that integrates three enabling strategies: (i) paired-sample transcriptome dynamics, (ii) N-of-1 pathway-based analytics, and (iii) reproducible machine learning operations (MLOps) for continuous model refinement. Methods: Unlike ML approaches relying on a single transcriptome per subject, within-subject paired-sample designs-such as pre- versus post-treatment or diseased versus adjacent-normal tissue-effectively control intraindividual variability under isogenic conditions and within-subject environmental exposures (eg, smoking history, other medications, etc), improve signal-to-noise ratios, and, when pre-processed as single- studies (N-of-1), can achieve statistical power comparable with that obtained in animal models. Pathway-level N-of-1 analytics further reduces each sample's high-dimensional profile into ~4000 biologically interpretable features, annotated with effect sizes, dispersion, and significance. Complementary MLOp practices-automated versioning, continuous monitoring, and adaptive hyperparameter tuning-improve model reproducibility and generalization. Results: In two case studies of distinct diseases, human rhinovirus infection (HRV) versus matched healthy controls (n=16 training; n=3 test) and breast cancer tissues harboring TP53 or PIK3CA mutations versus adjacent normal tissue (n=27 training; n=9 test)-this approach achieved 90% precision and recall on an unseen breast cancer test set and 92% precision with 90% recall in rhinovirus fivefold cross-validation. Incorporating paired-sample dynamics boosted precision by up to 12% and recall by 13% in breast cancer and by 5% each in HRV. MLOps workflows yielded an additional ~14.5% accuracy improvement compared to traditional pipelines. Moreover, our method identified 42 critical gene sets (pathways) for rhinovirus response and 21 for breast cancer mutation status, selected as the most important features (mean decrease impurity) of the best-performing model, with retroactive ablation of top 20 features reducing accuracy by ~25%. Conclusions: These proof-of-concept results support the utility of integrating intrasubject dynamics, "biological knowledge"-based feature reduction (pathway-level feature reduction grounded in prior biological knowledge; eg, N-of-1-pathway analytics), and reproducible MLOp workflows can overcome cohort size limitations in infrequent disease, offering a scalable, interpretable solution for high-dimensional transcriptomic classification. Future work will extend these advances across various therapeutic and small cohort designs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».