MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417035862 · doi:10.2196/80735

Paired-Sample and Pathway-Anchored MLOps Framework for Robust Transcriptomic Machine Learning in Small Cohorts: Model Classification Study

2025· article· en· W4417035862 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahdieh Shabanian, Nima Pouladi, Liam Wilson, Mattia Prosperi, Yves A. Lussier

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowFeature (linguistics)Reduction (mathematics)Feature selectionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Approximately 90% of the 65,000 human diseases are infrequent, collectively affecting ~400 million people, substantially limiting cohort accrual. This low prevalence constrains the development of robust transcriptome-based machine learning (ML) classifiers. Standard data-driven classifiers typically require cohorts of more than 100 participants per group to achieve clinical accuracy while managing high-dimensional input (~25,000 transcripts). These requirements are infeasible for microcohorts of ~20 individuals, where overfitting becomes pervasive. Objective: To overcome these constraints, we developed a classification method that integrates three enabling strategies: (i) paired-sample transcriptome dynamics, (ii) N-of-1 pathway-based analytics, and (iii) reproducible machine learning operations (MLOps) for continuous model refinement. Methods: Unlike ML approaches relying on a single transcriptome per subject, within-subject paired-sample designs-such as pre- versus post-treatment or diseased versus adjacent-normal tissue-effectively control intraindividual variability under isogenic conditions and within-subject environmental exposures (eg, smoking history, other medications, etc), improve signal-to-noise ratios, and, when pre-processed as single- studies (N-of-1), can achieve statistical power comparable with that obtained in animal models. Pathway-level N-of-1 analytics further reduces each sample's high-dimensional profile into ~4000 biologically interpretable features, annotated with effect sizes, dispersion, and significance. Complementary MLOp practices-automated versioning, continuous monitoring, and adaptive hyperparameter tuning-improve model reproducibility and generalization. Results: In two case studies of distinct diseases, human rhinovirus infection (HRV) versus matched healthy controls (n=16 training; n=3 test) and breast cancer tissues harboring TP53 or PIK3CA mutations versus adjacent normal tissue (n=27 training; n=9 test)-this approach achieved 90% precision and recall on an unseen breast cancer test set and 92% precision with 90% recall in rhinovirus fivefold cross-validation. Incorporating paired-sample dynamics boosted precision by up to 12% and recall by 13% in breast cancer and by 5% each in HRV. MLOps workflows yielded an additional ~14.5% accuracy improvement compared to traditional pipelines. Moreover, our method identified 42 critical gene sets (pathways) for rhinovirus response and 21 for breast cancer mutation status, selected as the most important features (mean decrease impurity) of the best-performing model, with retroactive ablation of top 20 features reducing accuracy by ~25%. Conclusions: These proof-of-concept results support the utility of integrating intrasubject dynamics, "biological knowledge"-based feature reduction (pathway-level feature reduction grounded in prior biological knowledge; eg, N-of-1-pathway analytics), and reproducible MLOp workflows can overcome cohort size limitations in infrequent disease, offering a scalable, interpretable solution for high-dimensional transcriptomic classification. Future work will extend these advances across various therapeutic and small cohort designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Bioinformatics and BiotechnologySame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207