MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417103769 · doi:10.1007/s13555-025-01609-6

A Post Hoc Analysis of Atopic Dermatitis of the Head and Neck and Other Body Regions from the Amlitelimab STREAM-AD Phase 2b Study

2025· article· en· W4417103769 sur OpenAlexaff
Adam Reich, Andrew Blauvelt, Stephan Weidinger, Vivian Y. Shi, Norito Katoh, Charles Lynde, Xing‐Hua Gao, Nicole M. Armstrong, Charlotte Bernigaud, Kassim Rahawi

Notice bibliographique

RevueDermatology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDermatology and Skin Diseases
Établissements canadiensLynde Centre for DermatologyUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesSanofi
Mots-clésPost-hoc analysisHead and neckAtopic dermatitisPost hocHead (geology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Amlitelimab (SAR445229, KY1005), a nondepleting anti-OX40 ligand monoclonal antibody, reduced lesions and pruritus in phase 2a and 2b trials in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Here, efficacy and durability of amlitelimab across body regions were evaluated, given that unmet needs remain for treatment of head and neck AD. STREAM-AD phase 2b trial data were used in this post hoc analysis. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive amlitelimab subcutaneously (250 mg with 500-mg loading dose, 250 mg, 125 mg, or 62.5 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks from weeks 0 to 24 (part 1). In part 2, clinical responders (patients achieving Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 and/or ≥ 75% reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI-75] at week 24) were re-randomized 3:1 to withdraw from amlitelimab or continue their pre-week 24 amlitelimab dose through week 52. EASI subscores and signs were evaluated for head and neck, trunk, lower extremities, and upper extremities. Part 1 included 390 randomized patients; 190 continued to part 2. In part 1, all EASI body region subscores were reduced with all amlitelimab doses at week 24 (P ≤ 0.01). Additionally, the four EASI signs—erythema, edema, excoriation, and lichenification—were reduced with amlitelimab vs. placebo. Greater proportions of patients achieved EASI-75 per body region with all amlitelimab doses, compared to placebo (P ≤ 0.05). At week 52, clinical responders maintained improvements in each body region achieved in part 1, regardless of treatment continuation or withdrawal. Improvements in AD signs and severity were observed with amlitelimab across all body regions. Notably, clinical responses were sustained following treatment withdrawal, supporting the potential for extended dosing intervals and durable off-treatment efficacy. Amlitelimab may be a treatment option for hard-to-treat head and neck AD that disproportionately impairs quality of life. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05131477. Atopic dermatitis (AD, or eczema) is a common chronic disease driven by an overactive immune system, leading to severely itchy, inflamed, and damaged skin. Amlitelimab, a medication that is being evaluated in clinical trials but has not yet been approved, is injected under the skin and targets OX40 ligand. OX40 ligand is a part of the immune system that is not targeted by current approved therapies. A previously reported clinical trial evaluated the effect of amlitelimab given every 4 weeks in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. In this report, data from the clinical trial were used to assess how different body regions responded to amlitelimab therapy. All body regions (head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities) showed improvements with all doses of amlitelimab by week 24 of treatment. The four signs associated with AD were also improved with amlitelimab across these body regions. These signs are redness, swelling, excoriation (scratch marks), and lichenification (leathery appearance). If by week 24 the skin cleared up or eczema area and severity greatly improved, patients were able to enter part 2 of the study. In part 2, they were randomly assigned to either stop receiving amlitelimab or to continue through week 52. Importantly, both groups maintained body region improvements achieved by week 24 at similar rates regardless of whether they stopped or continued treatment. This may indicate that patients can sustain improvements achieved with amlitelimab treatment even when amlitelimab is administered less frequently than every 4 weeks or discontinued entirely.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,324

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDermatology and TherapyMême sujetDermatology and Skin DiseasesTravaux en français237 207