MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417103769 · doi:10.1007/s13555-025-01609-6

A Post Hoc Analysis of Atopic Dermatitis of the Head and Neck and Other Body Regions from the Amlitelimab STREAM-AD Phase 2b Study

2025· article· en· W4417103769 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Reich, Andrew Blauvelt, Stephan Weidinger, Vivian Y. Shi, Norito Katoh, Charles Lynde, Xing‐Hua Gao, Nicole M. Armstrong, Charlotte Bernigaud, Kassim Rahawi

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsLynde Centre for DermatologyUniversity of Toronto
FundersSanofi
KeywordsPost-hoc analysisHead and neckAtopic dermatitisPost hocHead (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amlitelimab (SAR445229, KY1005), a nondepleting anti-OX40 ligand monoclonal antibody, reduced lesions and pruritus in phase 2a and 2b trials in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Here, efficacy and durability of amlitelimab across body regions were evaluated, given that unmet needs remain for treatment of head and neck AD. STREAM-AD phase 2b trial data were used in this post hoc analysis. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive amlitelimab subcutaneously (250 mg with 500-mg loading dose, 250 mg, 125 mg, or 62.5 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks from weeks 0 to 24 (part 1). In part 2, clinical responders (patients achieving Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 and/or ≥ 75% reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI-75] at week 24) were re-randomized 3:1 to withdraw from amlitelimab or continue their pre-week 24 amlitelimab dose through week 52. EASI subscores and signs were evaluated for head and neck, trunk, lower extremities, and upper extremities. Part 1 included 390 randomized patients; 190 continued to part 2. In part 1, all EASI body region subscores were reduced with all amlitelimab doses at week 24 (P ≤ 0.01). Additionally, the four EASI signs—erythema, edema, excoriation, and lichenification—were reduced with amlitelimab vs. placebo. Greater proportions of patients achieved EASI-75 per body region with all amlitelimab doses, compared to placebo (P ≤ 0.05). At week 52, clinical responders maintained improvements in each body region achieved in part 1, regardless of treatment continuation or withdrawal. Improvements in AD signs and severity were observed with amlitelimab across all body regions. Notably, clinical responses were sustained following treatment withdrawal, supporting the potential for extended dosing intervals and durable off-treatment efficacy. Amlitelimab may be a treatment option for hard-to-treat head and neck AD that disproportionately impairs quality of life. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05131477. Atopic dermatitis (AD, or eczema) is a common chronic disease driven by an overactive immune system, leading to severely itchy, inflamed, and damaged skin. Amlitelimab, a medication that is being evaluated in clinical trials but has not yet been approved, is injected under the skin and targets OX40 ligand. OX40 ligand is a part of the immune system that is not targeted by current approved therapies. A previously reported clinical trial evaluated the effect of amlitelimab given every 4 weeks in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. In this report, data from the clinical trial were used to assess how different body regions responded to amlitelimab therapy. All body regions (head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities) showed improvements with all doses of amlitelimab by week 24 of treatment. The four signs associated with AD were also improved with amlitelimab across these body regions. These signs are redness, swelling, excoriation (scratch marks), and lichenification (leathery appearance). If by week 24 the skin cleared up or eczema area and severity greatly improved, patients were able to enter part 2 of the study. In part 2, they were randomly assigned to either stop receiving amlitelimab or to continue through week 52. Importantly, both groups maintained body region improvements achieved by week 24 at similar rates regardless of whether they stopped or continued treatment. This may indicate that patients can sustain improvements achieved with amlitelimab treatment even when amlitelimab is administered less frequently than every 4 weeks or discontinued entirely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatology and TherapySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207