76 A Retrospective US Claims Database Study Highlights Unmet Treatment Needs in Patients With Crohn’s Disease (CD)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: CD is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder with a high disease burden and impact on quality of life. Despite the advent of several advanced therapies (ATs), there is a need for data on their use in clinical practice. A real-world analysis of patients with CD newly initiated on AT or an immunosuppressant (IMS) showed that many patients required combination or multiple lines of therapy (LoTs), suggesting inadequate disease control and highlighting the need for durable, effective, and tolerable therapies (Jairath V, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(10S):S819–S820). Here, we further investigate therapy sequence and duration in patients with CD initiated on AT. Methods: This retrospective US claims database (MerativeTM Marketscan®) study assessed therapy sequencing over 24 months in adults with CD newly initiated on AT (January 1, 2017–March 31, 2021). FDA-approved therapies through March 2021 were included. Patients had to be enrolled continuously for at least 12 months pre-index (date of first AT prescription; baseline period) and at least 24 months post-index (follow-up period). Therapy sequencing and duration of use were assessed using descriptive statistics. Results: Overall, 4,043 patients with CD received AT for the first time; of those, the most common were AT monotherapy (84.3%) and AT+corticosteroids (CS; 10.5%). Adalimumab (ADM) and infliximab (IFX) were the most common first-line monotherapy ATs. Of the 4043 patients, a total of 1,637 received second-line therapy; AT monotherapy (48.6%) and AT+CS (7.4%) were the most common regimens that included AT. ADM and ustekinumab were the most common second-line monotherapy ATs. Of 2,072 patients who received first-line ADM, 56.5% did not receive any additional LoT, 26.6% received AT in second-line, 10.1% received AT in subsequent lines after a non-AT second-line therapy, and 6.9% received no further AT. Of 921 patients who received IFX as first-line AT, 58.1% did not receive additional LoT, 24.8% received AT in second-line, 8.0% received AT in subsequent lines after a non-AT second-line therapy, and 9.1% received no further AT. Additionally, 19% of patients who received AT received at least a third LoT. Median duration of first-line therapy was 24.3 months in patients who received ADM and 21.9 months in patients who received IFX. Median duration of second-line AT in patients who received ADM or IFX as first-line therapy was 8.5 months and 8.9 months, respectively. Conclusions: These real-world data, describing the therapy patterns of patients with CD, show that patients often require multiple therapy options, suggesting that first-line therapies may not be sufficient to achieve and/or maintain remission. Early disease control and the ability to adjust therapies in response to CD flares in a timely manner are key to disease management and prevention of disease progression. Together, this highlights the need for first-line therapies that are efficacious and tolerable in achieving remission and durable in maintaining remission.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».