MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417273639 · doi:10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i121227

AI-driven Green Logistics: Optimizing Last-mile Delivery Networks with Electric Vehicles for Carbon Neutrality in U.S. Metropolitan Areas

2025· article· en· W4417273639 sur OpenAlex
Aderibigbe Michael Oluwaseyi, Monnu Paul Oluwadamilare, Paschal Alumona, SOMTO BENJAMIN ANIETO, Ezekiel Oluwagbemileke Ilori, EMMANUEL CHIAGOZIE AHAIWE, Mboe Fabiola Lizzy, Chioma Charity Ezeonu, CONFIDENCE ADIMCHI CHINONYEREM

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAsian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueUrban and Freight Transport Logistics
Établissements canadiensArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMetropolitan areaContext (archaeology)Green logisticsRouting (electronic design automation)Process (computing)Delivery PerformanceCustomer satisfactionBaseline (sea)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The last-mile delivery process has continued to be the costliest, time-consuming, and environmentally challenging part of logistics systems, and this challenge has been further amplified in the context of quickly increasing large cities worldwide. The conventional logistics delivery chain also faces issues such as traffic congestion, increasing fuel prices, downtime, route inefficiency, and high emissions. Artificial intelligence optimization in logistics systems and electric vehicles have emerged as new approaches to improve last-mile delivery performance. The current research aims to investigate to what degree last-mile delivery can be improved by artificial intelligence optimization in routing and electric vehicles. The research followed a descriptive and analytical research study design, mainly depending on secondary sources with research data collected from peer-reviewed journals, reports published from the logistics industry, case research, and transport data published by concerned government bodies from 2018 to 2025. The data were systematically filtered to determine their appropriateness, sound methodology, measurable variables, and level of empirical research. Important variables such as delivery time, cost of delivery, distance travelled, emissions from vehicles, energy utilization, traffic congestions, and customer density were utilized for comparative analysis and cause-effect analysis. Analysis of the results shows that there was a great improvement in delivery performance through routing via artificial intelligence. The average time reduced by 34.6 percent, cost of delivery fell by 31.5 percent, and distance travelled to complete delivery reduced by 34 percent. The percentage of successful deliveries rose to 89 percent. Failed deliveries fell to less than half. The reduction in carbon dioxide emissions reached 86.6 percent for electric delivery vehicles compared to gasoline vehicles. The emissions of nitrogen oxides were eliminated entirely. Analysis of customer density indicated that areas of high density receive even greater advantages from artificial intelligence clustering and electric vehicles. The trend of congestions also indicated that predictive models of artificial intelligence result in reduced delays within peak hours. All case study comparisons among large cities across America confirmed these results. The paper concludes that combining Artificial Intelligence and electric vehicles represents a scalable, cost-efficient, and sustainable solution for last-mile delivery route optimization. The combination of these solutions improves route optimization performance and helps to avoid disruptions in last-mile delivery operations. In conclusion, it can be seen that modern cities require intelligent route optimization solutions and environmentally sustainable last-mile delivery vehicles to meet the demands of modern cities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,336
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,484

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle