MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417273639 · doi:10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i121227

AI-driven Green Logistics: Optimizing Last-mile Delivery Networks with Electric Vehicles for Carbon Neutrality in U.S. Metropolitan Areas

2025· article· en· W4417273639 on OpenAlexaff
Aderibigbe Michael Oluwaseyi, Monnu Paul Oluwadamilare, Paschal Alumona, SOMTO BENJAMIN ANIETO, Ezekiel Oluwagbemileke Ilori, EMMANUEL CHIAGOZIE AHAIWE, Mboe Fabiola Lizzy, Chioma Charity Ezeonu, CONFIDENCE ADIMCHI CHINONYEREM

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban and Freight Transport Logistics
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaContext (archaeology)Green logisticsRouting (electronic design automation)Process (computing)Delivery PerformanceCustomer satisfactionBaseline (sea)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last-mile delivery process has continued to be the costliest, time-consuming, and environmentally challenging part of logistics systems, and this challenge has been further amplified in the context of quickly increasing large cities worldwide. The conventional logistics delivery chain also faces issues such as traffic congestion, increasing fuel prices, downtime, route inefficiency, and high emissions. Artificial intelligence optimization in logistics systems and electric vehicles have emerged as new approaches to improve last-mile delivery performance. The current research aims to investigate to what degree last-mile delivery can be improved by artificial intelligence optimization in routing and electric vehicles. The research followed a descriptive and analytical research study design, mainly depending on secondary sources with research data collected from peer-reviewed journals, reports published from the logistics industry, case research, and transport data published by concerned government bodies from 2018 to 2025. The data were systematically filtered to determine their appropriateness, sound methodology, measurable variables, and level of empirical research. Important variables such as delivery time, cost of delivery, distance travelled, emissions from vehicles, energy utilization, traffic congestions, and customer density were utilized for comparative analysis and cause-effect analysis. Analysis of the results shows that there was a great improvement in delivery performance through routing via artificial intelligence. The average time reduced by 34.6 percent, cost of delivery fell by 31.5 percent, and distance travelled to complete delivery reduced by 34 percent. The percentage of successful deliveries rose to 89 percent. Failed deliveries fell to less than half. The reduction in carbon dioxide emissions reached 86.6 percent for electric delivery vehicles compared to gasoline vehicles. The emissions of nitrogen oxides were eliminated entirely. Analysis of customer density indicated that areas of high density receive even greater advantages from artificial intelligence clustering and electric vehicles. The trend of congestions also indicated that predictive models of artificial intelligence result in reduced delays within peak hours. All case study comparisons among large cities across America confirmed these results. The paper concludes that combining Artificial Intelligence and electric vehicles represents a scalable, cost-efficient, and sustainable solution for last-mile delivery route optimization. The combination of these solutions improves route optimization performance and helps to avoid disruptions in last-mile delivery operations. In conclusion, it can be seen that modern cities require intelligent route optimization solutions and environmentally sustainable last-mile delivery vehicles to meet the demands of modern cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Advanced Research and ReportsSame topicUrban and Freight Transport LogisticsFrench-language works237,207