Mapping Changes to Geographical Names Over Time in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), in support of the Geographical Names Board of Canada (GNBC), introduces a new interactive map: Canada's Evolving Geographical Names.The GNBC is Canada's national coordinating body responsible for establishing standards and policies regarding place names, and is composed of representatives from federal, provincial, and territorial jurisdictions.To highlight the historical and cultural significance of Canada's geographical names, NRCan and the GNBC have released a series of interactive maps to showcase significant subthemes of toponymy, including place names that commemorate Canada's involvement in armed conflicts 1 , place names that honour women's contributions to Canadian society 3 , and names that recognize Indigenous cultures, languages and naming practices 4 .The newest map in the series (Figure 1) presents a curated selection of official geographical names that have changed over time, for various reasons, illustrating the evolution of place naming throughout Canadian history.Geographical names, or toponyms, are a fundamental element of geospatial data, and a key component of most cartographic products to ensure a map is authoritative and understandable.Official geographical place names-whether referring to populated areas, bodies of water, or landforms-are formally recognized and published by government authorities in maps, databases, and public documents.Accurate, official place names and their locations are also critical for providing services related to emergency response, communications and navigation systems.The process of adopting an official place name requires extensive consultation, research, and the establishment of standards, policies, and procedures.Approved names are recorded in the jurisdictional databases of GNBC members and in the Canadian Geographical Names Database 2 (CGNDB), the authoritative national repository of place names.Changes to official geographical names recognized by the federal, provincial, and territorial members of the GNBC may be made periodically.Members of the GNBC, each with jurisdictional authority, do not take the decision to change the official name of a place, location or geographical feature lightly or without significant consideration regarding the impact of the change.Actions to change official geographical names are not common, and require a strong, supported rationale.Changes are taken through formal processes maintained by Canada's naming authorities, typically requiring extensive discussion with stakeholders and partners, comprehensive research and consultation with local communities to ensure that the new name is culturally appropriate and supported, as well as final approval by senior levels of government.While naming jurisdictions strive for long term stability, consistency, and standardization in official geographical names, names can and do change over time for a variety of reasons.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».