Low-Carbohydrate Nutrition Counseling With Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Improve Metabolic Health Among Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes: Pilot Quality Improvement Initiative Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: One in 4 Veterans who receive care through the Veterans Health Administration has type 2 diabetes (T2D). Dietary carbohydrate restriction can promote weight loss and improve blood glucose control, but Veterans taking certain medications (eg, insulin) may experience serious complications (eg, hypoglycemia) without adequate support and monitoring. Objective: This study aims to develop and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effectiveness of a pilot low-carbohydrate (LC) nutrition counseling program guided by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for Veterans with T2D receiving insulin (ie, LC-CGM). Methods: This is a pragmatic, nonrandomized, pre-post quality improvement pilot program. Eligible patients were Veterans with T2D who were prescribed ≥3 daily injections of insulin. The 24-week LC-CGM program consisted of virtual visits with a registered dietitian (RD) and clinical pharmacy practitioner (CPP); CGM data were used to guide tailored nutrition counseling and de-escalation or cessation of glucose-lowering medications. To evaluate changes from baseline, intention-to-treat analyses were conducted for all enrollees, with separate analyses for program completers. Primary outcomes were program feasibility and acceptability (ie, program enrollment and completion rates and mean number of RD and CPP visits). Secondary outcomes included mean weight change, percent weight loss, achievement of ≥5% and ≥10% weight loss, change in glucose-lowering medication use, and change in laboratory measures (eg, hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]). Results: Program evaluation occurred from March 19, 2021, to May 3, 2024. Among 43 Veterans referred to the LC-CGM program, 38 (88%) enrolled. Most were men (37/38, 97%), white (29/38, 76%), with an average age of 63.7 (SD 9.6) years. Mean BMI and HbA1c were 38.1 (SD 5.8) kg/m2 and 7.8% (SD 1.3). Of 38 enrollees, 27 (71%) completed the program. Enrollees averaged 9.5 (SD 3.3) RD visits and 12.8 (SD 4.7) CPP visits. In intention-to-treat analyses, mean weight change was -11.5 kilograms (SD 8.7; 95% CI -14.4 to -8.6), corresponding to 9.5% weight loss (SD 7.2; 95% CI -14.9 to -4.2), with 58% (22/38) achieving ≥5% weight loss and 32% (12/38) achieving ≥10% weight loss. Overall, use of glucose-lowering medications decreased from 3.5 (SD 0.8) per patient at baseline to 2.4 (SD 0.9) per patient at 24 weeks (P<.001), with 72% (26/36) of Veterans discontinuing short-acting insulin and 50% (18/36; P<.001) discontinuing long-acting insulin. Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists increased from 39% (15/38) at baseline to 61% (23/38) at 24 weeks (P=.02). Among program completers (n=27), mean percent weight loss was -11.8% (SD 6.5) and median HbA1c decreased by 0.7% (95% CI -0.9 to -0.3; P=.001). Conclusions: This pilot program provides preliminary evidence that supports feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effectiveness among Veterans with T2D. Additional research is needed to rigorously test longer-term clinical and cost-effectiveness among a larger cohort of eligible Veterans.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».