Low-Carbohydrate Nutrition Counseling With Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Improve Metabolic Health Among Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes: Pilot Quality Improvement Initiative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: One in 4 Veterans who receive care through the Veterans Health Administration has type 2 diabetes (T2D). Dietary carbohydrate restriction can promote weight loss and improve blood glucose control, but Veterans taking certain medications (eg, insulin) may experience serious complications (eg, hypoglycemia) without adequate support and monitoring. Objective: This study aims to develop and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effectiveness of a pilot low-carbohydrate (LC) nutrition counseling program guided by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for Veterans with T2D receiving insulin (ie, LC-CGM). Methods: This is a pragmatic, nonrandomized, pre-post quality improvement pilot program. Eligible patients were Veterans with T2D who were prescribed ≥3 daily injections of insulin. The 24-week LC-CGM program consisted of virtual visits with a registered dietitian (RD) and clinical pharmacy practitioner (CPP); CGM data were used to guide tailored nutrition counseling and de-escalation or cessation of glucose-lowering medications. To evaluate changes from baseline, intention-to-treat analyses were conducted for all enrollees, with separate analyses for program completers. Primary outcomes were program feasibility and acceptability (ie, program enrollment and completion rates and mean number of RD and CPP visits). Secondary outcomes included mean weight change, percent weight loss, achievement of ≥5% and ≥10% weight loss, change in glucose-lowering medication use, and change in laboratory measures (eg, hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]). Results: Program evaluation occurred from March 19, 2021, to May 3, 2024. Among 43 Veterans referred to the LC-CGM program, 38 (88%) enrolled. Most were men (37/38, 97%), white (29/38, 76%), with an average age of 63.7 (SD 9.6) years. Mean BMI and HbA1c were 38.1 (SD 5.8) kg/m2 and 7.8% (SD 1.3). Of 38 enrollees, 27 (71%) completed the program. Enrollees averaged 9.5 (SD 3.3) RD visits and 12.8 (SD 4.7) CPP visits. In intention-to-treat analyses, mean weight change was -11.5 kilograms (SD 8.7; 95% CI -14.4 to -8.6), corresponding to 9.5% weight loss (SD 7.2; 95% CI -14.9 to -4.2), with 58% (22/38) achieving ≥5% weight loss and 32% (12/38) achieving ≥10% weight loss. Overall, use of glucose-lowering medications decreased from 3.5 (SD 0.8) per patient at baseline to 2.4 (SD 0.9) per patient at 24 weeks (P<.001), with 72% (26/36) of Veterans discontinuing short-acting insulin and 50% (18/36; P<.001) discontinuing long-acting insulin. Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists increased from 39% (15/38) at baseline to 61% (23/38) at 24 weeks (P=.02). Among program completers (n=27), mean percent weight loss was -11.8% (SD 6.5) and median HbA1c decreased by 0.7% (95% CI -0.9 to -0.3; P=.001). Conclusions: This pilot program provides preliminary evidence that supports feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effectiveness among Veterans with T2D. Additional research is needed to rigorously test longer-term clinical and cost-effectiveness among a larger cohort of eligible Veterans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".