MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4417491529 · doi:10.31996/mru.2025.4.9-13

Verification of germanium reserves: international experience, economic feasibility and prospects for Ukraine

2025· article· uk· W4417491529 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. S. Burlutskyy, Andrii Klisko

Notice bibliographique

RevueМінеральні ресурси України · 2025
Typearticle
Langueuk
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlan (archaeology)Raw materialCompetition (biology)European unionWork (physics)Development planEconomic feasibilityProduct (mathematics)Element (criminal law)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The European Union classifies germanium as a Critical Raw Material (CRM), which has limited supply and high economic importance. Given the availability of promising deposits and man-made sources of germanium, Ukraine has every chance to strengthen its role in global supply chain of this raw material. However, this requires verification of reserves and resources that meet international standards. Given that the main suppliers of germanium are concentrated in China, the EU is actively seeking to diversify its sources, particularly through projects in Canada, Africa and partner countries such as Ukraine.In today’s global competition for critical mineral resources, germanium (Ge) plays a strategic role in developing of semiconductor, defense, and energy technologies.For Ukraine, which has proven resources of germanium, the main challenge is not only the presence of this element in the subsoil, but also the verification of reserves in accordance with international standards. This verification is key element in the formation of an effective national policy of critical raw materials.The Plan for Ukraine was presented in March 2024. It outlines a medium-term vision for socioeconomic growth and tools for restoring, reconstructing, and modernizing the state. The plan accelerates Ukraine’s path to EU membership.Chapter 13 of this plan outlines the development plan (including reform directions) for the critical materials management sector. It envisages the reform of the national policy and regulatory framework in the field of critical materials and raw materials, in particular the development and adoption of a National Geological Strategy.In addition, it is planned to conduct a verification and reassessment of critical raw material reserves using international classification systems, in particular the UNFC, which, among other things, led to the implementation of research work on the topic: “Verification of critical/strategic mineral reserves in Ukraine”.Ukraine has quite large total resources of germanium in the form of an associated component in the coal of the Donbas and Lviv-Volyn basins, as well as in Precambrian iron ores and ores of polymetallic and gold-polymetallic deposits.The State Balance of Mineral Resources of Ukraine records 208 (69 under development) objects with germanium reserves in hard coal of the Donetsk and Lviv-Volyn basins. The list includes operating mines and mines under construction, and reserve areas for the construction and reconstruction of mines. It also includes areas with promising prospects for exploration, vacant areas near operating mines and closed mines. In deposits where state expertise was conducted, germanium was classified as an associated useful component of uncertain industrial significance (class code 332).The world uses the CRIRSCO international standards for compatible schemes (JORC, PERC, CIM, SAMREC). These standards work in harmony with the UN system – UNFC (United Nations Framework Classification for Resources), which is implemented in many countries, including Ukraine.In the EU, the USA, and China, verification of stocks of related elements is the basis of critical materials strategies.Ukraine has a significant, but not yet fully verified, potential for germanium, an element that meets the status of a critical raw material for the EU.Verification of stocks, in accordance with international standards and the terms of the Ukraine Facility Plan, is a key mechanism for: attracting investment; developing local processing and industrial production; integrating Ukraine into European critical materials chains; economic sustainability, technological modernization, and geopolitical influence.This is not only a geological task, but also a strategic vector of the country’s economic development during the post-war period and within the framework of European integration processes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,756
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueМінеральні ресурси УкраїниMême sujetEconomic Issues in UkraineTravaux en français237 207