MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W56554407

Putting the Horse before Descartes — My Life’s Work on Behalf of Animals

2012· article· en· W56554407 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Denna M. Benn

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineVeterinary
ThématiqueAnimal testing and alternatives
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnimal welfareCourageMedicinePolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsVeterinary medicineEngineering ethicsLawEngineeringPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As a laboratory animal veterinarian working in Canada, I have witnessed the progressive changes in animal welfare that have occurred worldwide in the past 30 years. This autobiographical book highlights Dr. Bernie Rollin’s legendary role in improving the welfare of animals used in veterinary medicine, agriculture, and scientific research in the United States during this period. Having attended lectures where the author’s macho, gun-slinger style, cussing and commonsense/no nonsense approach were guaranteed to upset the more conservative members of the audience; I thoroughly enjoyed this humorous, entertaining, and informative book. It explains Dr. Rollin’s aspiration to put “the horse before Descartes,” provides understanding of mannerisms the author adopted to give him courage to buck the system, outlines his accomplishments in effecting substantive improvements in animal welfare, and provides the reader with areas of animal welfare needing further improvement. In the introductory chapters, the author describes his upbringing and work and academic experiences which help the reader to understand the strategies and tactics Dr. Rollin honed over his career to make substantial changes to the care and use of animals, especially in agriculture and research. The author defines the term “ethics” and describes his involvement in developing an ethical framework for veterinary medicine, humane societies, and agricultural research groups. He taught the first veterinary medical ethics course in the United States at Colorado State University in the 1970s, and he provides numerous examples of the application of ethics in real-life situations. He laments the failure of organized veterinary medicine to incorporate ethics in all facets of the profession. In this regard, Dr. Rollin praises the Canadian Veterinary Journal editorial staff for initiating the ethics column (edited by Dr. Tim Blackwell) to which the author has contributed for over 20 years! In the chapter “The New Societal Ethic for Animals — A Philosophical Approach to Animal Ethics,” Dr. Rollin discusses the moral status of animals and the need to “…plug animals into the logic of our societal ethical system and …provide a basis for protecting animals beyond the very limited protection the law provided to them.” In his experience, he believes that in the United States, animals can best be protected by limiting the use of animals as property through enacting effective legislation. In three subsequent chapters, he discusses the successes and shortcomings of this strategy with regards to the amendments to laws governing the use of animals in research in the United States in the mid-1980s. He outlines the history of the need for these amendments and the resultant emergence of a meaningful social ethic for animals with the enactment of a pain and distress clause, the requirement for institutional animal care and use committees in research facilities, and husbandry regulations. He spotlights the strengths and weaknesses of these laws and makes suggestions for future amendments to more effectively meet the needs of animals and societal expectations. In Chapters 9–11, Dr. Rollin explains why the scientific community has not engaged in ethical consideration of scientific endeavors, how scientific ideology evolved, and outlines ethical issues pertaining to animals used in research that need to be addressed. In subsequent chapters, Rollin describes his involvement in ethical issues pertaining to numerous animal uses including companion animals, agriculture, and biotechnology. He stresses the importance of the role that veterinary practitioners, animal scientists, and other animal advocates should play in ensuring better treatment of pets, and farm and research animals. This is an interesting and informative book for anyone wishing a better understanding of the ethical issues involved in agriculture and the use of animals in large, small, and laboratory animal veterinary practice. This includes animal science and veterinary students, animal technicians, veterinary practitioners and agricultural, biomedical, and veterinary scientists. It effectively highlights the impact that an individual wishing to make a difference to improve animal welfare, can make on the well-being of animals in our society.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,048
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,430

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,131
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetAnimal testing and alternativesTravaux en français237 207