MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W56554407

Putting the Horse before Descartes — My Life’s Work on Behalf of Animals

2012· article· en· W56554407 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Denna M. Benn

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal testing and alternatives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal welfareCourageMedicinePolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsVeterinary medicineEngineering ethicsLawEngineeringPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a laboratory animal veterinarian working in Canada, I have witnessed the progressive changes in animal welfare that have occurred worldwide in the past 30 years. This autobiographical book highlights Dr. Bernie Rollin’s legendary role in improving the welfare of animals used in veterinary medicine, agriculture, and scientific research in the United States during this period. Having attended lectures where the author’s macho, gun-slinger style, cussing and commonsense/no nonsense approach were guaranteed to upset the more conservative members of the audience; I thoroughly enjoyed this humorous, entertaining, and informative book. It explains Dr. Rollin’s aspiration to put “the horse before Descartes,” provides understanding of mannerisms the author adopted to give him courage to buck the system, outlines his accomplishments in effecting substantive improvements in animal welfare, and provides the reader with areas of animal welfare needing further improvement. In the introductory chapters, the author describes his upbringing and work and academic experiences which help the reader to understand the strategies and tactics Dr. Rollin honed over his career to make substantial changes to the care and use of animals, especially in agriculture and research. The author defines the term “ethics” and describes his involvement in developing an ethical framework for veterinary medicine, humane societies, and agricultural research groups. He taught the first veterinary medical ethics course in the United States at Colorado State University in the 1970s, and he provides numerous examples of the application of ethics in real-life situations. He laments the failure of organized veterinary medicine to incorporate ethics in all facets of the profession. In this regard, Dr. Rollin praises the Canadian Veterinary Journal editorial staff for initiating the ethics column (edited by Dr. Tim Blackwell) to which the author has contributed for over 20 years! In the chapter “The New Societal Ethic for Animals — A Philosophical Approach to Animal Ethics,” Dr. Rollin discusses the moral status of animals and the need to “…plug animals into the logic of our societal ethical system and …provide a basis for protecting animals beyond the very limited protection the law provided to them.” In his experience, he believes that in the United States, animals can best be protected by limiting the use of animals as property through enacting effective legislation. In three subsequent chapters, he discusses the successes and shortcomings of this strategy with regards to the amendments to laws governing the use of animals in research in the United States in the mid-1980s. He outlines the history of the need for these amendments and the resultant emergence of a meaningful social ethic for animals with the enactment of a pain and distress clause, the requirement for institutional animal care and use committees in research facilities, and husbandry regulations. He spotlights the strengths and weaknesses of these laws and makes suggestions for future amendments to more effectively meet the needs of animals and societal expectations. In Chapters 9–11, Dr. Rollin explains why the scientific community has not engaged in ethical consideration of scientific endeavors, how scientific ideology evolved, and outlines ethical issues pertaining to animals used in research that need to be addressed. In subsequent chapters, Rollin describes his involvement in ethical issues pertaining to numerous animal uses including companion animals, agriculture, and biotechnology. He stresses the importance of the role that veterinary practitioners, animal scientists, and other animal advocates should play in ensuring better treatment of pets, and farm and research animals. This is an interesting and informative book for anyone wishing a better understanding of the ethical issues involved in agriculture and the use of animals in large, small, and laboratory animal veterinary practice. This includes animal science and veterinary students, animal technicians, veterinary practitioners and agricultural, biomedical, and veterinary scientists. It effectively highlights the impact that an individual wishing to make a difference to improve animal welfare, can make on the well-being of animals in our society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicAnimal testing and alternativesFrench-language works237,207