Ron Scapp. (2006). Managing to Be Different: Educational Leadership as Critical Practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ron Scapp. (2006). Managing to Be Different: Educational Leadership As Critical Practice. New York: Routledge. 154 pages. ISBN 978-0-415-94862-3 (hardcover); 978-0-415-94863-0 (softcover) Admittedly, the dedication page is an atypical starting point for a review; however, in the spirit of Scapp's Managing to Be Different, the reader might consider the following as an appropriate prologue to a book that casts critical pedagogy as the sine qua non for philosophically rigorous educational practice: For all those many awful meetings, the people who refused to listen, the really bad decisions that were made ... and to all who have had to endure such leadership.... (frontispiece) Though tongue-and-cheek, the above excerpt exemplifies well the candid approach Scapp takes in arguing for educational as critical practice. By the time the reader thumbs to the last page of Scapp's introduction, she or he will have been shaken from the somnambulance endemic to educational practice that has increasingly been informed by a corpus of what Scapp has coined celebrity leadership (p. 2), a genre of self-congratulatory evangelism propagated from the boardrooms and benches of elite CEOs and sports arenas. The growth of trite aphorisms such as there is no 'I' in 'team' (p. 2), Scapp argues, has been grafted onto educational literature; the reference to cliche rather than theory and praxis is the pestilence that has worked against education as the practice of freedom (p. 10). The emancipatory agenda of education, championed by Friere, forms the backbone of Scapp's argument. Citing the ideas of Bourdieu, hooks, and Giroux, Scapp challenges educational leaders to engage in critical pedagogy by confronting neoliberal logic and the ideology of fatalism. The goal of social justice is the idee fixe of the six key chapters that constitute Managing to Be Different. In the first chapter, Scapp identifies educational administrators as part of a circuitry of (p. 21), a realization made during his first experience as an educational administrator at LaGuardia Community College in New York. He unabashedly recounts his trepidation and disillusionment experienced during that administrative post, emphasizing that negotiating and navigating power relations for the sake of social justice are inherently central to educational administration. Advocates of social justice and those well-versed in critical theory may at first be impatient with Scapp's treatment of Chapter 1, for he dedicates much of the chapter to tracing his cyclic path from administrator to academic and back with relatively brief interjections of key theorists such as Bourdieu and Fraser. Read another way, however, Scapp cleverly works the double entendre of the book's title into his introduction. Admitting that as a neophyte administrator, he conflated this role with a representative of bureaucracy in general (p. 25), Scapp uses Bourdieu's notion of disposition to demonstrate his eventual understanding of educational administration as way of being [italics inserted] shaped by the intellectual, historical, social, cultural, and even corporeal. In this way, Scapp cleaves existing literature that reduces to a checklist of habits, best practices, or characteristics, and offers an organic conceptualization of leadership. At the same time, Scapp invokes the connotation of management by suggesting leaders must manage disposition--as Bourdieau described it--through disciplined reflexivity and constant modification of one's assumptions. Considering Scapp's philosophical acumen, it may be somewhat disappointing that he does not immediately plumb the conceptual depths of the ideas that frame his book; yet, one can appreciate the invitational tone of this chapter, especially for practitioners who are interested in self-exploration but do not have a background in philosophy or sociology. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,016 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,037 | 0,027 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».