Ron Scapp. (2006). Managing to Be Different: Educational Leadership as Critical Practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ron Scapp. (2006). Managing to Be Different: Educational Leadership As Critical Practice. New York: Routledge. 154 pages. ISBN 978-0-415-94862-3 (hardcover); 978-0-415-94863-0 (softcover) Admittedly, the dedication page is an atypical starting point for a review; however, in the spirit of Scapp's Managing to Be Different, the reader might consider the following as an appropriate prologue to a book that casts critical pedagogy as the sine qua non for philosophically rigorous educational practice: For all those many awful meetings, the people who refused to listen, the really bad decisions that were made ... and to all who have had to endure such leadership.... (frontispiece) Though tongue-and-cheek, the above excerpt exemplifies well the candid approach Scapp takes in arguing for educational as critical practice. By the time the reader thumbs to the last page of Scapp's introduction, she or he will have been shaken from the somnambulance endemic to educational practice that has increasingly been informed by a corpus of what Scapp has coined celebrity leadership (p. 2), a genre of self-congratulatory evangelism propagated from the boardrooms and benches of elite CEOs and sports arenas. The growth of trite aphorisms such as there is no 'I' in 'team' (p. 2), Scapp argues, has been grafted onto educational literature; the reference to cliche rather than theory and praxis is the pestilence that has worked against education as the practice of freedom (p. 10). The emancipatory agenda of education, championed by Friere, forms the backbone of Scapp's argument. Citing the ideas of Bourdieu, hooks, and Giroux, Scapp challenges educational leaders to engage in critical pedagogy by confronting neoliberal logic and the ideology of fatalism. The goal of social justice is the idee fixe of the six key chapters that constitute Managing to Be Different. In the first chapter, Scapp identifies educational administrators as part of a circuitry of (p. 21), a realization made during his first experience as an educational administrator at LaGuardia Community College in New York. He unabashedly recounts his trepidation and disillusionment experienced during that administrative post, emphasizing that negotiating and navigating power relations for the sake of social justice are inherently central to educational administration. Advocates of social justice and those well-versed in critical theory may at first be impatient with Scapp's treatment of Chapter 1, for he dedicates much of the chapter to tracing his cyclic path from administrator to academic and back with relatively brief interjections of key theorists such as Bourdieu and Fraser. Read another way, however, Scapp cleverly works the double entendre of the book's title into his introduction. Admitting that as a neophyte administrator, he conflated this role with a representative of bureaucracy in general (p. 25), Scapp uses Bourdieu's notion of disposition to demonstrate his eventual understanding of educational administration as way of being [italics inserted] shaped by the intellectual, historical, social, cultural, and even corporeal. In this way, Scapp cleaves existing literature that reduces to a checklist of habits, best practices, or characteristics, and offers an organic conceptualization of leadership. At the same time, Scapp invokes the connotation of management by suggesting leaders must manage disposition--as Bourdieau described it--through disciplined reflexivity and constant modification of one's assumptions. Considering Scapp's philosophical acumen, it may be somewhat disappointing that he does not immediately plumb the conceptual depths of the ideas that frame his book; yet, one can appreciate the invitational tone of this chapter, especially for practitioners who are interested in self-exploration but do not have a background in philosophy or sociology. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".