Nadahini Creek Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the fall of 2013 Government of Yukon constructed a geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS) at Nadahini Creek. The geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge constructed at Nadahini Creek is the first geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment bridge constructed by the Government of Yukon. This paper describes the project background, design and analysis of alternatives, construction of the selected alternative as well as lessons learned through project implementation. The Haines Road starts in Haines, Alaska, passes through British Columbia and ends at kilometre 246 in Haines Junction, Yukon Territory. The road serves as the only land route to Haines, Alaska which provides a ferry terminal for residents in central Alaska. Nadahini Creek is located at kilometre 109.2 of the Haines Road in British Columbia. The Government of Yukon maintains the Haines Road from the Canadian Border to Haines Junction. Nadahini Creek is a highly turbid glacial fed stream with alluvial fan morphology. Twin structural plate corrugated steel pipe arches (SPCSPA) were installed at Nadahini Creek in 1968. Throughout their life span aggraded material was occasionally cleaned out of the culverts by Highways and Public Works maintenance workers. In the summer of 2012 the culverts were aggraded with material and Highways and Public Works cleaned them out. When the bottoms of the culverts were exposed it was discovered that high amounts of sediment transport had worn through large portions of the inverts, compromising their structural integrity and posing a safety concern for traffic. Jack post supports were installed in the north culvert and Highways and Public Works began investigating design alternatives to replace the structures. Government of Yukon considered various alternatives including installing new SPCSPAs, open bottom arch culverts, a bridge on piles and a geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS). Many design factors were considered in the analysis of alternatives including formidable stream discharge values, large sediment transport and scour depths, as well as the need to accommodate fish passage. After completing a life cycle cost analysis, the GRS-IBS alternative with concrete precast box girders was selected and Government of Yukon began the design of the bridge. The GRS-IBS incorporates abutments constructed of closely spaced layers of high strength geosynthetic reinforcement in-filled with compacted granular material. The beams are seated directly on the compacted GRS abutment; no pile driving or pile caps are needed. The construction of the GRS-IBS at Nadahini Creek was constructed successfully and resulted in the conclusions that the construction of GRS-IBS are well suited for remote locations with low anticipated scour as there would be minimal excavation, minimal materials and construction time required for implementation. Using a straight facing wall opposed to a corrugated facing may also lend to ease of construction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».