MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W604812590

Aging and Narratives of Loss: A History of Social Suffering

2014· article· en· W604812590 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sam Migliore, Margaret Dorazio-Migliore

Notice bibliographique

RevueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueAging and Gerontology Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWrightNarrativeSociologyPoliticsFocus (optics)Affect (linguistics)PsychologyMental healthGerontologySocial psychologyAestheticsPolitical scienceMedicineHistoryLawPsychotherapistArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IntroductionThe gerontological literature tends to focus on two interrelated phenomena. The first is the notion that is intimately linked to a process of (e.g., Garatachea and Lucia 2013; Inouye et al. 2007; Schrack et al. 2010; Wright and Perricelli 2008)-loss in the sense of increasing difficulties with physical mobility, failures in memory and mental acumen, of social relationships (often due to the death of loved ones or one's inability to take part in various activities) and decline in mental and physical health, with death as the eventual and inevitable outcome. Second, the gerontological literature also focuses on the ways individuals can be assisted, directly or indirectly, to meet the challenges of these losses as they age (e.g., Chu 2011; Morris et al. 2010). Although laudable and potentially helpful to those in need, the focus on and its management tends to ignore or minimize key aspects of the of (Graham and Stephenson 2010; Migliore and Dorazio-Migliore 2010; Randall 2013).Today, a growing number of scholars acknowledge that may occur as people age but stress that the process of is much more complex than the attention to would indicate. Life consists of various ups and downs throughout a person's life and may vary considerably from person to person (Capps 2012; Leon 2012; Migliore and Dorazio-Migliore 2010; Pruyser 1975). A focus on tends to draw attention away from the significant political, economic and social factors that have affected and in some cases continue to affect the lives of specific individuals, as well as the experiences and interpretations that give meaning to how people see themselves and their situation(s) in later life (see Russell 2010; Wentzell 2013). A focus on physical and mental decline also facilitates the ever-expanding medicalization of (see Conrad 2007; Hadler 2011). What is often missing in the gerontological literature, then, is attention to the various contexts-personal, social, cultural and historical-that influence and affect individuals throughout their lives and thereby impact the of aging, including any decline in health (see Fuller-Iglesias et al. 2009; Martin-Matthews 2011; Mayer 2009).In this article, we build on ideas from critical and interpretive medical anthropology, life course theory and other sources to examine issues of complexity in aging. More specifically, we address these issues of complexity by focusing on the life experiences of one elderly Sicilian Canadian woman in her mid-80s. Our aim is to make use of life history and illness narratives to illustrate how this individual contextualizes her current experiences of aging and loss in terms of the cumulative distress she has endured as a result of her social situation in Sicily, emigration/immigration to Canada, work in the garment industry, financial problems and discrimination. Loss, as interpreted by this individual, is not associated with per se, but rather is a consequence of a lifetime of what we would call social suffering-human problems that have their origins and consequences in the devastating injuries that social force inflicts on human experience (Kleinman et al. 1996:xi).Distress, Illness Narratives and Social SufferingEveryone experiences pain and suffering at certain points in life. This is subjective and idiosyncratic. To communicate one's pain to others, however, this subjective must be transformed into a social and cultural language that others can understand (Nichter 1981; Parsons 1984).This language consists of: (1) a number of verbal and nonverbal cues people can use to express their suffering; (2) various cultural concepts that provide individuals with a basis for interpreting and explaining their experiences or the experiences of others; and, (3) various preventive and therapeutic rationales people can employ to guide them in their attempts to deal with illness and misfortune. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,073

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0220,064
Communication savante0,0120,020
Science ouverte0,0020,016
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Même sujetAging and Gerontology ResearchTravaux en français237 207