International cooperation in bankruptcy and insolvency matters : a joint research project of American College of Bankruptcy and International Insolvency Institute
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Authors' Foreword Chapter 1 General Introduction Insolvency and Bankruptcy Roman times Middle Ages Commercial Code of Napoleon and the Rise of General Bankruptcy Law Emerging Tendencies From History Our Stance Today: Differences in National Legal Systems Chapter 2 Prominent of Domestic Law Widely Accepted Broad of Insolvency Systems Maximization of Asset Value For All Creditors Recognizing/Preserving Existing Creditor Rights Equitable Treatment Of Similarly Situated Creditors Wide Disparities With Respect to Specific Procedures and Rules (Un)Equal Treatment of Pre-Petition Claims Maximizing Value in a Common Pool Preparation and Voting on a Plan of Reorganization Principles-Based Approaches to Modernization and Harmonization Chapter 3 Guiding approaches to international insolvency law The Basic Theoretical Divide: Territorialism v. Universalism Territorialism and Its Discontents Universalism and Market Symmetry Weighing the Advantages and Practical Impediments of the Competing Approaches Predictability & Prevention of Forum Shopping Upholding Legitimate Expectations: Vested and Fairness Minimizing Losses and Transaction Costs, Maximizing Value Alternatives Strengthening Universalism Cooperative Territorialism Mixing Universalism and Territorialism Choice of Law Modified Universalism Chapter 4 Unilateral & Bilateral Forms of National Cooperation Bilateral Treaties: From Medieval Origins to 19th and 20th Century Expansion Anglo-American Unilateral Cooperation: Legislation and Case Law United Kingdom: Common Law Cooperation and the Limited Role of s 426 United States: Early Resistance Gives Way To Statutory Cooperation, 304 Ambiguous Results On Both Sides of the Atlantic Several Unilateral Regimes in Modern Europe Germany Spain Belgium France Italy The Netherlands Eastern European States Chapter 5 Regional Cooperation and Regulation North America The Draft U.S.-Canada Bankruptcy Treaty The ALI Principles of Cooperation Among the NAFTA Countries The European Union Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters Coordinated Universality as Basic Model International Jurisdiction Applicable Law Recognition of Insolvency Proceedings Secondary Insolvency Proceedings The Position of Creditors Reorganization and Winding-up of Financial Institutions Conclusion Other Regional Arrangements Latin America Northern Europe Central Africa Southeast Asia Chapter 6 Convergence Through Legislation and Professional Cooperation Harmonization Through Legislation Alignment By Courts and Practitioners The Model International Insolvency Cooperation Act Governance By Private Agreement: Cross-Border Insolvency Protocols The Cross-Border Insolvency Concordat and Recent Protocols Private Workouts and INSOL International's Statement of Chapter 7 Modeling Cross-border Insolvency: The Role of UNCITRAL A Fair Framework for Effectively Addressing Cross-border Insolvency Cases The Model of the Model Law Limited Character Legislative Tool Practical Scope of the Model Law General Provisions Scope of Application Definitions Public Policy Exception Interpretation Access Unhindered Access Procedural Standing Position of Foreign Creditors Recognition of Foreign Proceedings Recognition and Its Effects Application for Recognition Decision to Recognize a Foreign Proceeding Relief Purpose of Relief Provisional Relief Additional Relief Protection of Interests Cross-border Cooperation and Communication International Practice Cooperation By Courts With Foreign Courts and Foreign Representatives Cooperation By Insolvency Office Holder With Foreign Courts and Foreign Representatives Means of Cooperation Coordination of Concurrent Proceedings Model of Concurrent Proceedings Territorial Proceedings Coordination of Proceedings Hotchpot Rule The Structure of the Model Law Appreciation in Legal Doctrine Enacting a Model Law Countries' Adoption of the Model Law Global Support Country by Country Conclusion
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,015 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».