International cooperation in bankruptcy and insolvency matters : a joint research project of American College of Bankruptcy and International Insolvency Institute
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Authors' Foreword Chapter 1 General Introduction Insolvency and Bankruptcy Roman times Middle Ages Commercial Code of Napoleon and the Rise of General Bankruptcy Law Emerging Tendencies From History Our Stance Today: Differences in National Legal Systems Chapter 2 Prominent of Domestic Law Widely Accepted Broad of Insolvency Systems Maximization of Asset Value For All Creditors Recognizing/Preserving Existing Creditor Rights Equitable Treatment Of Similarly Situated Creditors Wide Disparities With Respect to Specific Procedures and Rules (Un)Equal Treatment of Pre-Petition Claims Maximizing Value in a Common Pool Preparation and Voting on a Plan of Reorganization Principles-Based Approaches to Modernization and Harmonization Chapter 3 Guiding approaches to international insolvency law The Basic Theoretical Divide: Territorialism v. Universalism Territorialism and Its Discontents Universalism and Market Symmetry Weighing the Advantages and Practical Impediments of the Competing Approaches Predictability & Prevention of Forum Shopping Upholding Legitimate Expectations: Vested and Fairness Minimizing Losses and Transaction Costs, Maximizing Value Alternatives Strengthening Universalism Cooperative Territorialism Mixing Universalism and Territorialism Choice of Law Modified Universalism Chapter 4 Unilateral & Bilateral Forms of National Cooperation Bilateral Treaties: From Medieval Origins to 19th and 20th Century Expansion Anglo-American Unilateral Cooperation: Legislation and Case Law United Kingdom: Common Law Cooperation and the Limited Role of s 426 United States: Early Resistance Gives Way To Statutory Cooperation, 304 Ambiguous Results On Both Sides of the Atlantic Several Unilateral Regimes in Modern Europe Germany Spain Belgium France Italy The Netherlands Eastern European States Chapter 5 Regional Cooperation and Regulation North America The Draft U.S.-Canada Bankruptcy Treaty The ALI Principles of Cooperation Among the NAFTA Countries The European Union Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters Coordinated Universality as Basic Model International Jurisdiction Applicable Law Recognition of Insolvency Proceedings Secondary Insolvency Proceedings The Position of Creditors Reorganization and Winding-up of Financial Institutions Conclusion Other Regional Arrangements Latin America Northern Europe Central Africa Southeast Asia Chapter 6 Convergence Through Legislation and Professional Cooperation Harmonization Through Legislation Alignment By Courts and Practitioners The Model International Insolvency Cooperation Act Governance By Private Agreement: Cross-Border Insolvency Protocols The Cross-Border Insolvency Concordat and Recent Protocols Private Workouts and INSOL International's Statement of Chapter 7 Modeling Cross-border Insolvency: The Role of UNCITRAL A Fair Framework for Effectively Addressing Cross-border Insolvency Cases The Model of the Model Law Limited Character Legislative Tool Practical Scope of the Model Law General Provisions Scope of Application Definitions Public Policy Exception Interpretation Access Unhindered Access Procedural Standing Position of Foreign Creditors Recognition of Foreign Proceedings Recognition and Its Effects Application for Recognition Decision to Recognize a Foreign Proceeding Relief Purpose of Relief Provisional Relief Additional Relief Protection of Interests Cross-border Cooperation and Communication International Practice Cooperation By Courts With Foreign Courts and Foreign Representatives Cooperation By Insolvency Office Holder With Foreign Courts and Foreign Representatives Means of Cooperation Coordination of Concurrent Proceedings Model of Concurrent Proceedings Territorial Proceedings Coordination of Proceedings Hotchpot Rule The Structure of the Model Law Appreciation in Legal Doctrine Enacting a Model Law Countries' Adoption of the Model Law Global Support Country by Country Conclusion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".