Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Transatlantic Music: Folk, Blues, and National Identities. Edited by Jill Terry and Neil A. Wynn. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2012. ISBN 978-161703-288-2. Roots or routes? editors of this set of conference proceedings intended to keep both senses of this homophonic pun. title of September 2009 conference at University of Worcester, England was The Transatlantic Routes of Music. Jill Terry and Neil Wynn explain in their introduction (p.ix), As knowledge of music and culture of non-English-speaking, nonwhite, non-European, and non-American grew, folk music broadened into 'world' and then 'roots' That is not to say that folk music evolved by itself into world music and roots music, but rather perception of listeners, researchers, editors, and retailers evolved to such labels. Terry and Wynn confirm this by adding (p.ix) the collection [of essays] explores not just interconnectedness of folk/roots music on either side of Atlantic, but also issues--the routes in conference title--of discovery rediscovery and representation of such musical forms. Continuing into first paper, Terry and Wynn amplify their sense of routes through historical and social contexts since 1950, of which I presume present book is latest event. While reading rest of proceedings, we should note direction each contribution is headed: eastward to United Kingdom, or westward to United States? Organized chronologically, two contributions about early research of Paul Oliver are placed first. Since publication of Blues Fell This Morning: Meaning in Blues (Cassell; Horizon, 1960), Oliver has been longest-standing leader in blues research, and in his native England through his books and media broadcasts, he is a cultural hero. For Worcester conference, he gave a sketch of history of promotion and appreciation in Europe of African American music from 1870s to 1970s, including his key early works Blues Fell This Morning and Story of Blues (Barrie & Rockliff, Cresset Press, 1969). Christian O'Connell follows with a frank appraisal of Oliver's pre-1960 blues writings. For all intents and purposes, as first British scholar of blues, Oliver had to begin with a very romantic notion of culture that spawned blues. O'Connell admits (p.52), The reader of Oliver's work from 1950s is presented with images of a world where boundaries between historical fact and fictive elements of writer's imagination are often unclear. such, his publications through 1959 may have to be regarded as juvenilia. next three contributions treat musicians in white American ballad tradition and folk music. Erich Nunn leads first, noting that John Lomax had learned what was to become popular song Home on Range from a black singer, and that Bradley Kincaid had acquired his first guitar from his father, who in turned had traded for it from an African-American man. If attitude of early researchers like Cecil Sharp in American folk music was to seek Anglo antecedents, then Nunn may be right to call Lomax's situation of finding in a white cowboy culture an African American source the anxiety of ancestry. Let me render such anxiety in today's terms. Can a white man sing blues? has been an abiding question since 1950s. But that a black man sings cowboy music is a troubling one, especially for mainstream white culture who has adopted Home on Range since its first publication nearly a century ago. To take my argument further, can a black man sing Dixie? According to Howard L. Sacks and Judith Rose Sacks in their book Way Up North in Dixie: A Black Family's Claim to Confederate Anthem (Smithsonian Institution Press, 1993), an African American may have been song's creator. Will Kaufman examines international influence of Woody Guthrie, ascribing it to three pairs of contrasts: low-class laborer and middleclass city man; Midwest rural versus East Coast urban; and commercial appeal of music versus its potential for activism. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».