The subjective warrant and recruitment into physical education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purposes of this study were to review and synthesize a wide variety of occupational choice and professional socialization literature in order to develop and test a theoretical framework for the subjective warrant for physical education. Forty subjects from six schools in the Vancouver School Board served as subjects for the study. There were six categories of subjects in this study, males and females who were decided on a career in physical education, who were attracted to a career in physical education and who were high achievers in sport and physical education but had decided against a career in physical education. A written questionnaire, which was developed from the theoretical framework and pilot tested on both undergraduate physical education majors and grade 12 high school students, was administered to the subjects in small groups. The data from the study was analysed using content analysis and qualitative research methods. It was found that for a majority of individuals there existed a dominant subjective warrant for physical education. This subjective warrant was one in which a career in physical education was viewed as a career in teaching and coaching. A small minority of subjects in the study had subjective warrants that did not view teaching and coaching as the only career opportunities available in physical education. In addition, it was found that the majority of subjects who had rejected careers in physical education had subjective warrants in which a career in physical education The purposes of this study were to review and synthesize a wide variety of occupational choice and professional socialization literature in order to develop and test a theoretical framework for the subjective warrant for physical education. Forty subjects from six schools in the Vancouver School Board served as subjects for the study. There were six categories of subjects in this study, males and females who were decided on a career in physical education, who were attracted to a career in physical education and who were high achievers in sport and physical education but had decided against a career in physical education. A written questionnaire, which was developed from the theoretical framework and pilot tested on both undergraduate physical education majors and grade 12 high school students, was administered to the subjects in small groups. The data from the study was analysed using content analysis and qualitative research methods. It was found that for a majority of individuals there existed a dominant subjective warrant for physical education. This subjective warrant was one in which a career in physical education was viewed as a career in teaching and coaching. A small minority of subjects in the study had subjective warrants that did not view teaching and coaching as the only career opportunities available in physical education. In addition, it was found that the majority of subjects who had rejected careers in physical education had subjective warrants in which a career in physical education
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,038 | 0,082 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».