The subjective warrant and recruitment into physical education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to review and synthesize a wide variety of occupational choice and professional socialization literature in order to develop and test a theoretical framework for the subjective warrant for physical education. Forty subjects from six schools in the Vancouver School Board served as subjects for the study. There were six categories of subjects in this study, males and females who were decided on a career in physical education, who were attracted to a career in physical education and who were high achievers in sport and physical education but had decided against a career in physical education. A written questionnaire, which was developed from the theoretical framework and pilot tested on both undergraduate physical education majors and grade 12 high school students, was administered to the subjects in small groups. The data from the study was analysed using content analysis and qualitative research methods. It was found that for a majority of individuals there existed a dominant subjective warrant for physical education. This subjective warrant was one in which a career in physical education was viewed as a career in teaching and coaching. A small minority of subjects in the study had subjective warrants that did not view teaching and coaching as the only career opportunities available in physical education. In addition, it was found that the majority of subjects who had rejected careers in physical education had subjective warrants in which a career in physical education The purposes of this study were to review and synthesize a wide variety of occupational choice and professional socialization literature in order to develop and test a theoretical framework for the subjective warrant for physical education. Forty subjects from six schools in the Vancouver School Board served as subjects for the study. There were six categories of subjects in this study, males and females who were decided on a career in physical education, who were attracted to a career in physical education and who were high achievers in sport and physical education but had decided against a career in physical education. A written questionnaire, which was developed from the theoretical framework and pilot tested on both undergraduate physical education majors and grade 12 high school students, was administered to the subjects in small groups. The data from the study was analysed using content analysis and qualitative research methods. It was found that for a majority of individuals there existed a dominant subjective warrant for physical education. This subjective warrant was one in which a career in physical education was viewed as a career in teaching and coaching. A small minority of subjects in the study had subjective warrants that did not view teaching and coaching as the only career opportunities available in physical education. In addition, it was found that the majority of subjects who had rejected careers in physical education had subjective warrants in which a career in physical education
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.038 | 0.082 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".