Proposed Rule Changes in College Basketball
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to survey the opinions of head basketball coaches of colleges and universities throughout the United States and Canada relative to proposed rule changes in college basketball. Methodology involved construction of a ten item questionnaire dealing with proposed rule changes; a five item Liekert Scale was utilized for measurement of responses. The college classifications included divisions I, II, and III of the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics and the Canadian College Athletic Association. The total population of college head coaches surveyed was 1,222; there were 842 returns. The overall response was 69 percent. Frequency distributions and histograms were developed for each of the ten proposed rule changes. The coaches responding seemed to feel that none of the following proposed rule changes were needed: l) extension of the free throw lane from 12 feet to 14 feet, 2) use of three officials, 3) utilization of a thirty second shot clock, 4) use of a thirty second shot clock up until the last five minutes of the second half and up until the last two minutes of any overtime period, 5) elimination of all one and one bonus situations with two shots awarded after the tenth team foul in each half, 6) no automatic disqualifications after five fouls, 7) awarding of three foul shots to make two if fouled in the act of shooting, 8) extension of the personal foul limit from five to six, 9) elimination of the center jump and all other jumps with teams gaining alternate possession, 10) disallowing offensive tip in baskets. Crosstabulation analyses were compiled to determine if a statistically significant relationship existed between college classification and expressed opinions of head coaches. All contingency coefficients among classifications of colleges surveyed proved to be no greater than r = .39, which indicated little shared variance. This research seemed to indicate, based on the questionnaire developed for the study, that the majority of coaches were not in favor of the proposed rule changes in college basketball. Also, the classification or status of the colleges had little impact on the opinions or responses of the coaches. Ultimately, as supported by the analysis of the data from the questions asked, the coaches seemed to like the collegiate game of basketball the way it is presently played. However, a variety of free responses revealed that coaches favor some rule changes. These changes may come about following more input, open discussion and game-like experimentation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».