MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893713507 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3796937

Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) hilariformis Frey

2019· article· en· W6893713507 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésField (mathematics)Fixation (population genetics)Taxonomy (biology)Context (archaeology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) hilariformis Frey (Figs 30–32, 62D) Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) hilariformis Frey, 1922: 35. Type-locality: Dudinka [69°24′N 86°11′E, Krasnoyarskiy Ter- ritory, Russia]. Other references: Frey, 1955a: 480 (revision); Chvála & Wagner, 1989: 300 (catalogue); Yang et al., 2007: 171 (catalogue); Shamshev, 2016: 64 (checklist). Rhamphomyia hilariformis Frey: Melander, 1928: 194 (catalogue); Notes on synonymy. Frey (1922) described this species in his keys to Rhamphomyia, based on an unknown number of male specimens. The lectotype male is recognized by fixation of Frey (1955b: 481) (mention of “ 1 ♂ -Ex. (der Typus)” in MZH is regarded as a lectotype fixation). Type material examined. LECTOTYPE [http://id.luomus.fi/GV.5567] ♂ (Fig. 30A), labelled (Fig. 30B): “Dudinka”; “Wuorentaus”; “1233”; “Mus. Zool. H:fors/ Spec.Typ.No 4662/ Rhamph. hila-/ riformis Frey”; “HO- LOTYPUS/ Rhamphomyia./ hilariformis/ ♂ Frey/ rev. Barták, 85 [red label]”; “ Rhamphomyia / (Pararhampho- myia)/ hilariformis Frey / det. Barták, 1986” (MZH). Additional material examined. CANADA. Northwest Territories: Cameron Bay, Great Bear Lake, 6.vii.1937, T. N. Freeman (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Yellowknife, 62.50714°, -113.39443°, 236 m, mesic, MT, Repl. 3, 15– 18.vi.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, LEM). Nunavut: Bathurst Inlet, 19.vii.1951, C.B. Bird (6 ♂, CNC); Frobisher Bay, 15.viii.1959, W. R. Richards (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Iqaluit, 63.75117°, -68.45898°, MT, Repl.3, mesic, 17–21.vii.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, 2 ♀, LEM); same data except, pan traps, CCDB-21421-D10 (1 ♀, barcode associated, LEM); Iqaluit, 63.75122°, -68.45927°, wet, mesic, MT, Repl.3, 21–25.vii.2010, NBP field party, CCBD-21421-A07 (1 ♂, barcoded, LEM); Kugluktuk, 67.78463°, -115.27979°, mesic, MT, Repl.1, 13–19.vi.2010, NBP field party (3 ♂, LEM); same data except, CCBD-21421-C06 (1 ♂, barcoded, LEM); same data except, CCDB-21421-E11 (1 ♀, bar- coded, LEM); same data except, 4–10.viii.2010 (1 ♂, LEM); same data except, 25–29.vi.2010 (1 ♂, LEM); Kugluk- tuk, 67.83538°, -115.20987°, mesic, MT, Repl.2, 3–7.vii.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, LEM); Kugluktuk, 67.77436°, -115.30732°, mesic, MT, Repl.3, 7–12.vii.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, LEM); Kugluktuk, 67.75117°, -115.45898°, mesic, pan traps, Repl.3, 17–21.vii.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, LEM). Quebec: Fort Chimo, 2.vii.1954, J.F. McAlpine (3 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, ZIN); same data, 10.vii.1948, H.N. Smith (1 ♂, CNC); same data, 23.viii.1948, H.H. McLeod (1 ♀, CNC); Indian House Lk., 7.vii.1954, W. R. Richards (1 ♂, CNC); same data, 8.vii.1954, R. Coyles (1 ♀, CNC); Payne Bay, 16–26.vii.1958, W. R. M. Mason (2 ♂, 9 ♀, CNC); same data, 21–27.vii., 4.viii.1958, E.E. MacDougall (4 ♂, 10 ♀, CNC). Yukon: British Mtns, 69°13′N 140°05′W, 18–25.vi. 1984, 320 m, G. & M. Wood & D. Lafontaine (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC), same data except, CNC163366, CNC163367, CNC163368, CNC163369, CNC163370 (3 ♂, 2 ♀, barcoded, CNC); Dempster Hwy, mi 87, 1–17.vii.1973, G. & D.M. Wood (4 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Dempster Hwy, km 140.5, 17–18.vii. 1981, 900 m, D. Lafontaine, G. & D.M. Wood (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Dempster Hwy, km 155, 29.vi.–3.vii. 1980, 950 m, D.M. Wood & D. Lafontaine (2 ♀, CNC); Dempster Hwy, km 155, 13–15.vii.1981, 1520 m, D. Lafontaine, G. & D.M. Wood (1 ♀, CNC). USA. Alaska: Chitina, 16–21.vi.1953, W.C. F. (3 ♂, 3 ♀, CNC; 1 ♂, 2 ♀, USNM); George Parks Highway, mi 231, Denali Grizzly Bear Cabins & Cpgd, 3–4.vii.1996, flight trap, P.H. & M. Arnaud (2 ♂, USNM); McKinley Hotel, 16.vi.–2.vii.1954, W.C. F. (3 ♂, 4 ♀, CNC; 9 ♂, USNM); 5 mi NE Salmon Lk, Nome-Taylor Hwy, 20.vi.1994, T. Saigusa (3 ♂, KUMF); Nome Area, mi 17 Kougarok Rd, 65°42′22″N 165°17′50″W, 21–23.vi.2005, MT, J. & R. Skevington (6 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Nome Area, mi 55 Kougarok Rd, 65°05′23″N 165°40′20″W, 20–26.vi.2005, MT, J. & R. Skevington (2 ♂, CNC); Nome Area, mi 72 Kougarok Rd, 65°16′54″N 164°48′45″W, 23.vi.2005, J. & R. Skevington (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Richardson Hwy, mi 146, 18.vi.1985, D.M. Wood (1 ♂, CNC). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other species of Pararhamphomyia by the orange-brown coloured legs with brown to black setae. The male foreleg tarsomere 1 is elongate and swollen, broader than width of fore tibia and subequal in length to remaining tarsomeres. The apical half of female wings are darker than base. Redescription. Wing length 6.5–7.3 mm. Male. Head dark with grey pruinescence on face, frons, occiput and postgena. Holoptic, eye with ommatidia larger on upper half, smaller on lower half. Frons represented by very small triangular space below ocellar tubercle and larger subtriangular space above antennae, bare; face slightly divergent towards mouthparts; bare, with oral margin pale brown and pruinescent. Ocellar triangle lustrous or only lightly pruinose and brown, with 1 pair of fine, long, anterior setae; 1 pair of posterior setae fine, and 1/2 length of anterior ocellars, divergent, more widely separated than anterior ocellars; 1 pair of postocellar setae similar to posterior ocellars. Occiput bearing row of dark postocular setae, upper 3 setae longest; lower postocular setae subequal in length to occipital setae; setae on postgena pale, finer and longer than occipital setae. Antenna with postpedicel and stylus dark; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; scape slightly more than 2X longer than pedicel; pedicel bulbous; postpedicel about 6X longer than basal width; stylus slender, slightly shorter than postpedicel basal width. Palpus pale brown, with short, fine, dark setulae. Clypeus with grey pruinescence; labrum lustrous and dark reddish-brown with apex black, 1.5X height of eye; labellum pale brown, bearing fine, short, dark setulae. Thorax dark in ground-colour, largely densely grey pruinescence. Scutum with pair of blackish vittae between acr and dc rows. Pleura with grey pruinescence, with orange shadows on sclerites, especially concentrated around katepisternum, anepimeron and anepimeron. Proepisternum with 2–3 short, fine, dark setae on lower part; upper proepisternum in front of spiracle bare; prosternum bare and pale orange in middle. Antepronotum with row of short, dark, stout setae. Postpronotum bearing 1 pprn and 3 short, dark setae. Scutum with biserial row of acr, shorter and finer than dc; dc uniserial, some 13 setae, anterior seta offset laterally; 1 presut spal (= posthumeral); 1–2 anterior npl and 3–4 stout posterior npl; 1 prealar, 1–2 psut spal; 1 pal and 1–2 short, dark seta; 2–3 pairs of sctl. Laterotergite with many pale and dark, fine setae. Anterior and posterior spiracles yellowish brown. Legs mostly orange-brown, coxae paler. Fore femur with 1 anteroventral and 1 posteroventral row of fine setae, anteroventrals longer than posteroventrals. Mid femur with 1 anteroventral and 1 posteroventral row of multi-lengthened setae. Hind femur with pile beneath; anteroventral row with setae of differing lengths, longer than posteroventral row of setae (Fig. 19B). Fore tibia usually with fine setae. Mid and hind tibiae (Fig. 19B) with anteroventral and posteroventral setae dark, strong; mid tibia with widely spaced row of long, slender setae, length nearly twice width of tibia; hind tibia with long anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae, length of some twice width of tibia; 1 long seta in posteroapical comb of hind tibia. Fore tarsomere 1 elongated and swollen, broader than width of fore tibia, slightly shorter than remaining tarsomeres (Fig. 31A); ventral margin flattened with pile-like setae; dorsal margin slightly arched and tapered distally and basally. Mid and hind tarsomere 1 not swollen, with numerous ventral setae. Wing slightly infuscate with brownish veins; without basal costal seta; all veins complete (except Sc), well sclerotized, with CuA+CuP reduced to pale trace to wing margin. Pterostigma present as darkened region. Anal lobe well-developed; axillary incision at right angle. Halter white. Abdomen reddish brown, thinly pruinescent, paler than thoracic ground colour; posterior margin of abdominal segments pale. Sclerites clothed with long, fine, pale brown setae. Sternite 8 shorter than preceding sternites, posterior marginal setae shorter than length of sternite; ventral margin thinly sclerotized; tergite 8 2/3 as long as sternite 8 with many long, fine dark setae. Terminalia (Figs 31 C-E) largely brown with apical half of epandrium yellow; epandrium base pubescent, bearing several long, dark setae; epandrium width decreasing till constricted in middle; epandrium tip lustrous and rectangular, bearing many dark, short, spine-like setae. Cercus swollen basally, pubescent, sharply tapered apically to slim dorsal finger-like projection; clothed in fine setae. Subepandrial lobe digitiform, bifurcate with outer branch about 2X longer than inner fork; clothed in fine setae (Fig. 31C). Hypandrium short, boot-shaped, triangular tip ending at base of basiphallus. Phallus lustrous, orange; basiphallus swollen, ridged and more rectangular than rounded; ventral surface of basiphallus with cluster of microtrichia; phallus filiform apically, without loops, extending almost farther than epandrium, and curving back in between cerci. Ejaculatory apodeme small, acutely fan-shaped, with lateral wings at ventral margin and shorter than vertical apodeme. Female. Similar to male except apical half of female wing darker than base (Fig. 62D); hind femur yellowish brown; legs without pennate setae; abdominal setae dark and short. Distribution. This transcontinental species inhabits the low arctic region of North America (Fig. 32) and is known from the Chukotka and north of Krasnoyarskiy Territory of Russia. Remarks. Rhamphomyia hilariformis is assigned to the R. tipularia group (Saigusa (unpubl. data), which from North America includes R. lymaniana sp. nov. and two additional undescribed species. The R. tipularia group is defined here by pale halteres and slender and simple male legs. The male terminalia are characterized by a domelike cerci, often larger than the epandri

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,069

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorTravaux en français237 207