MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893713507 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3796937

Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) hilariformis Frey

2019· article· en· W6893713507 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Fixation (population genetics)Taxonomy (biology)Context (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) hilariformis Frey (Figs 30–32, 62D) Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) hilariformis Frey, 1922: 35. Type-locality: Dudinka [69°24′N 86°11′E, Krasnoyarskiy Ter- ritory, Russia]. Other references: Frey, 1955a: 480 (revision); Chvála & Wagner, 1989: 300 (catalogue); Yang et al., 2007: 171 (catalogue); Shamshev, 2016: 64 (checklist). Rhamphomyia hilariformis Frey: Melander, 1928: 194 (catalogue); Notes on synonymy. Frey (1922) described this species in his keys to Rhamphomyia, based on an unknown number of male specimens. The lectotype male is recognized by fixation of Frey (1955b: 481) (mention of “ 1 ♂ -Ex. (der Typus)” in MZH is regarded as a lectotype fixation). Type material examined. LECTOTYPE [http://id.luomus.fi/GV.5567] ♂ (Fig. 30A), labelled (Fig. 30B): “Dudinka”; “Wuorentaus”; “1233”; “Mus. Zool. H:fors/ Spec.Typ.No 4662/ Rhamph. hila-/ riformis Frey”; “HO- LOTYPUS/ Rhamphomyia./ hilariformis/ ♂ Frey/ rev. Barták, 85 [red label]”; “ Rhamphomyia / (Pararhampho- myia)/ hilariformis Frey / det. Barták, 1986” (MZH). Additional material examined. CANADA. Northwest Territories: Cameron Bay, Great Bear Lake, 6.vii.1937, T. N. Freeman (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Yellowknife, 62.50714°, -113.39443°, 236 m, mesic, MT, Repl. 3, 15– 18.vi.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, LEM). Nunavut: Bathurst Inlet, 19.vii.1951, C.B. Bird (6 ♂, CNC); Frobisher Bay, 15.viii.1959, W. R. Richards (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Iqaluit, 63.75117°, -68.45898°, MT, Repl.3, mesic, 17–21.vii.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, 2 ♀, LEM); same data except, pan traps, CCDB-21421-D10 (1 ♀, barcode associated, LEM); Iqaluit, 63.75122°, -68.45927°, wet, mesic, MT, Repl.3, 21–25.vii.2010, NBP field party, CCBD-21421-A07 (1 ♂, barcoded, LEM); Kugluktuk, 67.78463°, -115.27979°, mesic, MT, Repl.1, 13–19.vi.2010, NBP field party (3 ♂, LEM); same data except, CCBD-21421-C06 (1 ♂, barcoded, LEM); same data except, CCDB-21421-E11 (1 ♀, bar- coded, LEM); same data except, 4–10.viii.2010 (1 ♂, LEM); same data except, 25–29.vi.2010 (1 ♂, LEM); Kugluk- tuk, 67.83538°, -115.20987°, mesic, MT, Repl.2, 3–7.vii.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, LEM); Kugluktuk, 67.77436°, -115.30732°, mesic, MT, Repl.3, 7–12.vii.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, LEM); Kugluktuk, 67.75117°, -115.45898°, mesic, pan traps, Repl.3, 17–21.vii.2010, NBP field party (1 ♂, LEM). Quebec: Fort Chimo, 2.vii.1954, J.F. McAlpine (3 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, ZIN); same data, 10.vii.1948, H.N. Smith (1 ♂, CNC); same data, 23.viii.1948, H.H. McLeod (1 ♀, CNC); Indian House Lk., 7.vii.1954, W. R. Richards (1 ♂, CNC); same data, 8.vii.1954, R. Coyles (1 ♀, CNC); Payne Bay, 16–26.vii.1958, W. R. M. Mason (2 ♂, 9 ♀, CNC); same data, 21–27.vii., 4.viii.1958, E.E. MacDougall (4 ♂, 10 ♀, CNC). Yukon: British Mtns, 69°13′N 140°05′W, 18–25.vi. 1984, 320 m, G. & M. Wood & D. Lafontaine (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC), same data except, CNC163366, CNC163367, CNC163368, CNC163369, CNC163370 (3 ♂, 2 ♀, barcoded, CNC); Dempster Hwy, mi 87, 1–17.vii.1973, G. & D.M. Wood (4 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Dempster Hwy, km 140.5, 17–18.vii. 1981, 900 m, D. Lafontaine, G. & D.M. Wood (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Dempster Hwy, km 155, 29.vi.–3.vii. 1980, 950 m, D.M. Wood & D. Lafontaine (2 ♀, CNC); Dempster Hwy, km 155, 13–15.vii.1981, 1520 m, D. Lafontaine, G. & D.M. Wood (1 ♀, CNC). USA. Alaska: Chitina, 16–21.vi.1953, W.C. F. (3 ♂, 3 ♀, CNC; 1 ♂, 2 ♀, USNM); George Parks Highway, mi 231, Denali Grizzly Bear Cabins & Cpgd, 3–4.vii.1996, flight trap, P.H. & M. Arnaud (2 ♂, USNM); McKinley Hotel, 16.vi.–2.vii.1954, W.C. F. (3 ♂, 4 ♀, CNC; 9 ♂, USNM); 5 mi NE Salmon Lk, Nome-Taylor Hwy, 20.vi.1994, T. Saigusa (3 ♂, KUMF); Nome Area, mi 17 Kougarok Rd, 65°42′22″N 165°17′50″W, 21–23.vi.2005, MT, J. & R. Skevington (6 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Nome Area, mi 55 Kougarok Rd, 65°05′23″N 165°40′20″W, 20–26.vi.2005, MT, J. & R. Skevington (2 ♂, CNC); Nome Area, mi 72 Kougarok Rd, 65°16′54″N 164°48′45″W, 23.vi.2005, J. & R. Skevington (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Richardson Hwy, mi 146, 18.vi.1985, D.M. Wood (1 ♂, CNC). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other species of Pararhamphomyia by the orange-brown coloured legs with brown to black setae. The male foreleg tarsomere 1 is elongate and swollen, broader than width of fore tibia and subequal in length to remaining tarsomeres. The apical half of female wings are darker than base. Redescription. Wing length 6.5–7.3 mm. Male. Head dark with grey pruinescence on face, frons, occiput and postgena. Holoptic, eye with ommatidia larger on upper half, smaller on lower half. Frons represented by very small triangular space below ocellar tubercle and larger subtriangular space above antennae, bare; face slightly divergent towards mouthparts; bare, with oral margin pale brown and pruinescent. Ocellar triangle lustrous or only lightly pruinose and brown, with 1 pair of fine, long, anterior setae; 1 pair of posterior setae fine, and 1/2 length of anterior ocellars, divergent, more widely separated than anterior ocellars; 1 pair of postocellar setae similar to posterior ocellars. Occiput bearing row of dark postocular setae, upper 3 setae longest; lower postocular setae subequal in length to occipital setae; setae on postgena pale, finer and longer than occipital setae. Antenna with postpedicel and stylus dark; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; scape slightly more than 2X longer than pedicel; pedicel bulbous; postpedicel about 6X longer than basal width; stylus slender, slightly shorter than postpedicel basal width. Palpus pale brown, with short, fine, dark setulae. Clypeus with grey pruinescence; labrum lustrous and dark reddish-brown with apex black, 1.5X height of eye; labellum pale brown, bearing fine, short, dark setulae. Thorax dark in ground-colour, largely densely grey pruinescence. Scutum with pair of blackish vittae between acr and dc rows. Pleura with grey pruinescence, with orange shadows on sclerites, especially concentrated around katepisternum, anepimeron and anepimeron. Proepisternum with 2–3 short, fine, dark setae on lower part; upper proepisternum in front of spiracle bare; prosternum bare and pale orange in middle. Antepronotum with row of short, dark, stout setae. Postpronotum bearing 1 pprn and 3 short, dark setae. Scutum with biserial row of acr, shorter and finer than dc; dc uniserial, some 13 setae, anterior seta offset laterally; 1 presut spal (= posthumeral); 1–2 anterior npl and 3–4 stout posterior npl; 1 prealar, 1–2 psut spal; 1 pal and 1–2 short, dark seta; 2–3 pairs of sctl. Laterotergite with many pale and dark, fine setae. Anterior and posterior spiracles yellowish brown. Legs mostly orange-brown, coxae paler. Fore femur with 1 anteroventral and 1 posteroventral row of fine setae, anteroventrals longer than posteroventrals. Mid femur with 1 anteroventral and 1 posteroventral row of multi-lengthened setae. Hind femur with pile beneath; anteroventral row with setae of differing lengths, longer than posteroventral row of setae (Fig. 19B). Fore tibia usually with fine setae. Mid and hind tibiae (Fig. 19B) with anteroventral and posteroventral setae dark, strong; mid tibia with widely spaced row of long, slender setae, length nearly twice width of tibia; hind tibia with long anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae, length of some twice width of tibia; 1 long seta in posteroapical comb of hind tibia. Fore tarsomere 1 elongated and swollen, broader than width of fore tibia, slightly shorter than remaining tarsomeres (Fig. 31A); ventral margin flattened with pile-like setae; dorsal margin slightly arched and tapered distally and basally. Mid and hind tarsomere 1 not swollen, with numerous ventral setae. Wing slightly infuscate with brownish veins; without basal costal seta; all veins complete (except Sc), well sclerotized, with CuA+CuP reduced to pale trace to wing margin. Pterostigma present as darkened region. Anal lobe well-developed; axillary incision at right angle. Halter white. Abdomen reddish brown, thinly pruinescent, paler than thoracic ground colour; posterior margin of abdominal segments pale. Sclerites clothed with long, fine, pale brown setae. Sternite 8 shorter than preceding sternites, posterior marginal setae shorter than length of sternite; ventral margin thinly sclerotized; tergite 8 2/3 as long as sternite 8 with many long, fine dark setae. Terminalia (Figs 31 C-E) largely brown with apical half of epandrium yellow; epandrium base pubescent, bearing several long, dark setae; epandrium width decreasing till constricted in middle; epandrium tip lustrous and rectangular, bearing many dark, short, spine-like setae. Cercus swollen basally, pubescent, sharply tapered apically to slim dorsal finger-like projection; clothed in fine setae. Subepandrial lobe digitiform, bifurcate with outer branch about 2X longer than inner fork; clothed in fine setae (Fig. 31C). Hypandrium short, boot-shaped, triangular tip ending at base of basiphallus. Phallus lustrous, orange; basiphallus swollen, ridged and more rectangular than rounded; ventral surface of basiphallus with cluster of microtrichia; phallus filiform apically, without loops, extending almost farther than epandrium, and curving back in between cerci. Ejaculatory apodeme small, acutely fan-shaped, with lateral wings at ventral margin and shorter than vertical apodeme. Female. Similar to male except apical half of female wing darker than base (Fig. 62D); hind femur yellowish brown; legs without pennate setae; abdominal setae dark and short. Distribution. This transcontinental species inhabits the low arctic region of North America (Fig. 32) and is known from the Chukotka and north of Krasnoyarskiy Territory of Russia. Remarks. Rhamphomyia hilariformis is assigned to the R. tipularia group (Saigusa (unpubl. data), which from North America includes R. lymaniana sp. nov. and two additional undescribed species. The R. tipularia group is defined here by pale halteres and slender and simple male legs. The male terminalia are characterized by a domelike cerci, often larger than the epandri

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207