MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893859284 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5062297

Schizoporella Hincks 1877

2014· article· en· W6893859284 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMarine Ecology and Invasive Species
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBayGenusTaxonomy (biology)Pacific oceanNOMINATE

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Schizoporella on the Pacific coast of North America Schizoporella unicornis, a Recent bryozoan originally described in a work on the Coralline Crag by Johnston (in Wood 1844; see Tompsett et al. 2009 for details) is a well-known European species (Johnston 1847; Hincks 1880; Ryland 1965; Hayward & Ryland 1995, 1999; but not Marcus 1940 (= S. errata, absent from northern Europe)) that is unknown on the Pacific coast of North America. Because of undue reliance on European literature, generally inappropriate for the Pacific coast (e.g. Ryland & Porter 2012), the characteristics of this species (Hayward & Ryland 1995, 1999; Tompsett et al. 2009), especially the marginally fluted but virtually non-porous ovicell, were missed by authors or deliberately ignored (e.g. Ross & McCain 1976) and the name unicornis has been incorrectly applied to at least two quite different species. Osburn (1952) —before S. japonica had been recognized in the northwest—included only one nominate species that would now be included in the genus Schizoporella, using the name S. unicornis, from various localities in California. Osburn’s account is now known to have been based on a mixture of S. japonica and S. errata (Powell 1970) and S. pseudoerrata (described by Soule et al. 1995). The current distribution of S. errata is unclear since the species is not discussed by Soule et al. (1995, 2007), though it is certainly common in San Francisco Bay (Zabin et al. 2010). The differences between S. unicornis and S. errata are in fact numerous and considerable (this paper and Ryland 1965; Hastings 1968; Hayward & Ryland 1999; Hayward & McKinney 2002; Tompsett et al. 2009). Whether S. errata should be regarded as a single species, a complex, or several species is another issue (Winston & Hayward 2012), which cannot be resolved here. While Schizoporella errata, being a well-known fouling species, seems likely to have been introduced to the Pacific coast well before its first recorded occurrences (as S. unicornis, by Osburn 1952), S. japonica is most certainly a recent alien. However, Powell (1970) established that it (as S. unicornis), as opposed to S. errata, was present in Newport Bay, Los Angeles, as long ago as 1938 (material collected by G. E. MacGinitie); he assumed that it had arrived with Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas, which had been imported from Japan (first to Morro Bay) since 1932. This is the earliest record for this species on the west coast of North America. Powell (1970) referred to additional material in USNM from Newport, collected 1943, and Morro Bay, collected 1968. Powell (1970) himself found it (still using the name S. unicornis) from the Strait of Georgia, Canada. It had not been found earlier by O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue (1923, 1925, 1926) but was found by Powell during 1966–69 from several stations in the San Juan Islands, on Vancouver Island, and from as far north as Pendrell Sound (50° N). As for California, he attributed its arrival to the extensive importation of Pacific oysters from Japan in the period 1926– 1935. Its recorded range was extended to further localities in Washington State by Ross & McCain (1976), who conducted a thorough study of zooidal shape [the variability noted earlier that arises from the growth pattern of circular colonies, a topic also investigated in this species by Thorpe & Ryland (1987)]. It was also collected in San Francisco Bay during 1977 (NHMUK 1978.1.4.2). Whereas S. errata, as a warm-water species, is likely to be commonest south of San Francisco, the converse is true for S. japonica. It has spread northwards through Canada to southern Alaska (Dick et al. 2005) but, as already noted, it extends southwards beyond San Francisco to Morro Bay (#14) and (historically at least) to the Los Angeles area. Thus it now appears that three distinct species of Schizoporella occur in central California (i.e. the Monterey Bay area), S. errata, S. japonica, and S. pseudoerrata, the first two, at least, being introductions. Sorte et al. (2010) listed an unidentified Schizoporella from Bodega Harbor, most likely S. japonica (see #21) but possibly S. errata, and Zabin et al. (2012) recorded unidentified Schizoporella from two sites at Santa Cruz. Schizoporella pseudoerrata at present has a very localized confirmed distribution (Soule et al. 1995) although it has been listed as present at two sites in the northern part of San Francisco Bay—Richmond Marina (Blum et al. 2007) and Tiburon (Crooks et al. 2011). It is possible that these records are based on misidentifications and might be either of the other two species. With all three species now recognized and described, it should be possible to correctly identify Schizoporella specimens from the Pacific coast. The characteristics of the three Californian species are summarised in Table 7 (particularly note the distinctive condyles, observation of which requires the preparation of specimens with a hypochlorite bleach such as Clorox: see Material and Methods above), which should be used in conjunction with Figures 2–4 and 10. In addition to morphometric methods, genetic techniques have recently been applied in two non-native fouling bryozoan species-groups. In Bugula neritina (Linnaeus), three biological species were identified. One of these, haplotype S, was globally distributed (Fehlauer-Ale et al. 2013). In Watersipora subtorquata, three clades were identified by Mackie et al. (2012). These studies provide evidence for cryptic speciation in the fouling community. Genetic studies on Schizoporella japonica are currently underway to investigate the potential for cryptic species in this taxon.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,050

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,189 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesTravaux en français237 207