MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893859284 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5062297

Schizoporella Hincks 1877

2014· article· en· W6893859284 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Ecology and Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayGenusTaxonomy (biology)Pacific oceanNOMINATE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizoporella on the Pacific coast of North America Schizoporella unicornis, a Recent bryozoan originally described in a work on the Coralline Crag by Johnston (in Wood 1844; see Tompsett et al. 2009 for details) is a well-known European species (Johnston 1847; Hincks 1880; Ryland 1965; Hayward & Ryland 1995, 1999; but not Marcus 1940 (= S. errata, absent from northern Europe)) that is unknown on the Pacific coast of North America. Because of undue reliance on European literature, generally inappropriate for the Pacific coast (e.g. Ryland & Porter 2012), the characteristics of this species (Hayward & Ryland 1995, 1999; Tompsett et al. 2009), especially the marginally fluted but virtually non-porous ovicell, were missed by authors or deliberately ignored (e.g. Ross & McCain 1976) and the name unicornis has been incorrectly applied to at least two quite different species. Osburn (1952) —before S. japonica had been recognized in the northwest—included only one nominate species that would now be included in the genus Schizoporella, using the name S. unicornis, from various localities in California. Osburn’s account is now known to have been based on a mixture of S. japonica and S. errata (Powell 1970) and S. pseudoerrata (described by Soule et al. 1995). The current distribution of S. errata is unclear since the species is not discussed by Soule et al. (1995, 2007), though it is certainly common in San Francisco Bay (Zabin et al. 2010). The differences between S. unicornis and S. errata are in fact numerous and considerable (this paper and Ryland 1965; Hastings 1968; Hayward & Ryland 1999; Hayward & McKinney 2002; Tompsett et al. 2009). Whether S. errata should be regarded as a single species, a complex, or several species is another issue (Winston & Hayward 2012), which cannot be resolved here. While Schizoporella errata, being a well-known fouling species, seems likely to have been introduced to the Pacific coast well before its first recorded occurrences (as S. unicornis, by Osburn 1952), S. japonica is most certainly a recent alien. However, Powell (1970) established that it (as S. unicornis), as opposed to S. errata, was present in Newport Bay, Los Angeles, as long ago as 1938 (material collected by G. E. MacGinitie); he assumed that it had arrived with Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas, which had been imported from Japan (first to Morro Bay) since 1932. This is the earliest record for this species on the west coast of North America. Powell (1970) referred to additional material in USNM from Newport, collected 1943, and Morro Bay, collected 1968. Powell (1970) himself found it (still using the name S. unicornis) from the Strait of Georgia, Canada. It had not been found earlier by O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue (1923, 1925, 1926) but was found by Powell during 1966–69 from several stations in the San Juan Islands, on Vancouver Island, and from as far north as Pendrell Sound (50° N). As for California, he attributed its arrival to the extensive importation of Pacific oysters from Japan in the period 1926– 1935. Its recorded range was extended to further localities in Washington State by Ross & McCain (1976), who conducted a thorough study of zooidal shape [the variability noted earlier that arises from the growth pattern of circular colonies, a topic also investigated in this species by Thorpe & Ryland (1987)]. It was also collected in San Francisco Bay during 1977 (NHMUK 1978.1.4.2). Whereas S. errata, as a warm-water species, is likely to be commonest south of San Francisco, the converse is true for S. japonica. It has spread northwards through Canada to southern Alaska (Dick et al. 2005) but, as already noted, it extends southwards beyond San Francisco to Morro Bay (#14) and (historically at least) to the Los Angeles area. Thus it now appears that three distinct species of Schizoporella occur in central California (i.e. the Monterey Bay area), S. errata, S. japonica, and S. pseudoerrata, the first two, at least, being introductions. Sorte et al. (2010) listed an unidentified Schizoporella from Bodega Harbor, most likely S. japonica (see #21) but possibly S. errata, and Zabin et al. (2012) recorded unidentified Schizoporella from two sites at Santa Cruz. Schizoporella pseudoerrata at present has a very localized confirmed distribution (Soule et al. 1995) although it has been listed as present at two sites in the northern part of San Francisco Bay—Richmond Marina (Blum et al. 2007) and Tiburon (Crooks et al. 2011). It is possible that these records are based on misidentifications and might be either of the other two species. With all three species now recognized and described, it should be possible to correctly identify Schizoporella specimens from the Pacific coast. The characteristics of the three Californian species are summarised in Table 7 (particularly note the distinctive condyles, observation of which requires the preparation of specimens with a hypochlorite bleach such as Clorox: see Material and Methods above), which should be used in conjunction with Figures 2–4 and 10. In addition to morphometric methods, genetic techniques have recently been applied in two non-native fouling bryozoan species-groups. In Bugula neritina (Linnaeus), three biological species were identified. One of these, haplotype S, was globally distributed (Fehlauer-Ale et al. 2013). In Watersipora subtorquata, three clades were identified by Mackie et al. (2012). These studies provide evidence for cryptic speciation in the fouling community. Genetic studies on Schizoporella japonica are currently underway to investigate the potential for cryptic species in this taxon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207