Rhopalomyia clarkei Felt 1907
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rhopalomyia clarkei Felt 1907 Rhopalomyia clarkei Felt 1907c: 18. Adult: Antenna with 17–19 flagellomeres in male, 15–17 in female; necks of male flagellomeres III–VII 0.57–0.77 times as long as nodes, necks of female flagellomeres 0.19–0.23 times as long as nodes. Palpus 1-segmented, fusiform to triangular, tapered, setose and setulose. Wing length 2.4–2.6 mm in male, 2.2–2.5 mm in female. Male terminalia (Fig. 14): gonocoxite bulbous, setose and setulose, with setose mediobasal lobe; gonocoxal apodeme anteriorly divided into two very short lobes; gonostylus wide, hardly narrowed toward apex, setose and setulose, with small, brush-like tooth; aedeagus narrow, truncate; hypoproct entire, truncate, setose and setulose; cerci separated by a triangular notch, setose and setulose. Female abdomen (Fig. 30): tergite 7 rectangular, weakly sclerotized along anterior and posterior margins, with two anterior trichoid sensilla, a group of setae posteriorly, and groups of setae mesolaterally; tergite 8 wide Y-shaped, arms about third length of shaft, each with anterior trichoid sensillum; ovipositor 6.3 times as long as tergite 7. Pupa (Figs. 44–45): Antennal bases developed into abruptly tapering horns, pointed anteriorly. Posterior margins of antennal bases rounded V-shaped in frontal view. Frons without projections, ridges or lateral projections, posterior edge widely rounded. Type material: Rhopalomyia clarkei Felt. Holotype: female, USA, NH, Tamworth, 6/X/1907, C.H. Clarke, ex S. rugosa, Felt # a1634, deposited in Felt Collection. Other material examined: 1 male, USA, MA, Magnolia, unspecified date, C.H. Clarke, ex. S. rugosa, Felt # a1634, deposited in Felt Collection; 2 males, 2 females, 2 pupae, USA, NY, Fall Creek and Freese Rd., 8–19/VIII/1987, M.V. McEvoy, ex S. rugosa; 3 pupae, USA, PA, Bucknell University Chillisquaque Creek Natural Area, 16/VI/2005, N. Dorchin, ex. S. rugosa; 2 females, USA, VA, Boyce, 8/X/2008, M. Wise, ex. S. altissima. Felt (1915) mentioned that galls of this species were also collected by him from Solidago canadensis (the name he used for S. altissima) in Asheville, NC on 29/IX/1906, as well as by T.D. Jarvis in Ontario, Canada on 20/IX/1907. Hosts: Solidago rugosa, S. altissima. Gall and biology: The galls are small, conical and single-chambered, usually occurring on the lower side of leaves but occasionally on the upper side of leaves and on stems (Figs.62–65). When on leaves, the gall is always attached to either a major or minor vein (Figs. 62–64). Each gall contains a single white larva. Galls on S. rugosa are 2.5–6.0 mm long and 0.7–1.2 mm wide at widest part, tapering toward apex, green to yellowish green, and covered by short, whitish hairs. Very young galls are sometimes accompanied by a tuft of hair at their base, almost as long as the gall itself. The species is multivoltine and galls can be found from late May to early October. It is heavily parasitized and adults are extremely difficult to rear. In September and October 2008, similar galls were found on Solidago altissima in Boyce, Virginia by M. Wise (Fig. 65). Only two females were reared from these galls, but based on their morphology and that of the galls, we concluded they belong to R. clarkei, confirming Felt’s report (1915) of this species from S. altissima. Remarks: The tiny, inconspicuous galls of R. clarkei were originally described only from Solidago rugosa, but we found very similar galls on three other hosts: R. altissima (Fig. 65), R. gigantea (Fig. 67), and R. juncea (Fig. 68). We initially assumed that galls from all these hosts belong to R. clarkei, but a recent molecular analysis (Dorchin et al., in prep.) indicate that the populations from S. gigantea and S. juncea represent distinct species, with the former being the closest relative of R. clarkei. Samples from S. altissima were not analyzed. The population from S. gigantea is discussed below under R. inquisitor and R. sp., whereas the population from S. juncea is described here as a new species – R. gina. Rhopalomyia clarkei is morphologically very similar to R. inquisitor, but differs from R. gina in having stouter male gonopods and in lacking a longitudinal groove along the antennal horns and lateral projections of the eyes in the pupa.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».