MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893927856 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6217051

Rhopalomyia clarkei Felt 1907

2009· article· en· W6893927856 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicVector-Borne Animal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAedeagusSetaOvipositorClearanceAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhopalomyia clarkei Felt 1907 Rhopalomyia clarkei Felt 1907c: 18. Adult: Antenna with 17–19 flagellomeres in male, 15–17 in female; necks of male flagellomeres III–VII 0.57–0.77 times as long as nodes, necks of female flagellomeres 0.19–0.23 times as long as nodes. Palpus 1-segmented, fusiform to triangular, tapered, setose and setulose. Wing length 2.4–2.6 mm in male, 2.2–2.5 mm in female. Male terminalia (Fig. 14): gonocoxite bulbous, setose and setulose, with setose mediobasal lobe; gonocoxal apodeme anteriorly divided into two very short lobes; gonostylus wide, hardly narrowed toward apex, setose and setulose, with small, brush-like tooth; aedeagus narrow, truncate; hypoproct entire, truncate, setose and setulose; cerci separated by a triangular notch, setose and setulose. Female abdomen (Fig. 30): tergite 7 rectangular, weakly sclerotized along anterior and posterior margins, with two anterior trichoid sensilla, a group of setae posteriorly, and groups of setae mesolaterally; tergite 8 wide Y-shaped, arms about third length of shaft, each with anterior trichoid sensillum; ovipositor 6.3 times as long as tergite 7. Pupa (Figs. 44–45): Antennal bases developed into abruptly tapering horns, pointed anteriorly. Posterior margins of antennal bases rounded V-shaped in frontal view. Frons without projections, ridges or lateral projections, posterior edge widely rounded. Type material: Rhopalomyia clarkei Felt. Holotype: female, USA, NH, Tamworth, 6/X/1907, C.H. Clarke, ex S. rugosa, Felt # a1634, deposited in Felt Collection. Other material examined: 1 male, USA, MA, Magnolia, unspecified date, C.H. Clarke, ex. S. rugosa, Felt # a1634, deposited in Felt Collection; 2 males, 2 females, 2 pupae, USA, NY, Fall Creek and Freese Rd., 8–19/VIII/1987, M.V. McEvoy, ex S. rugosa; 3 pupae, USA, PA, Bucknell University Chillisquaque Creek Natural Area, 16/VI/2005, N. Dorchin, ex. S. rugosa; 2 females, USA, VA, Boyce, 8/X/2008, M. Wise, ex. S. altissima. Felt (1915) mentioned that galls of this species were also collected by him from Solidago canadensis (the name he used for S. altissima) in Asheville, NC on 29/IX/1906, as well as by T.D. Jarvis in Ontario, Canada on 20/IX/1907. Hosts: Solidago rugosa, S. altissima. Gall and biology: The galls are small, conical and single-chambered, usually occurring on the lower side of leaves but occasionally on the upper side of leaves and on stems (Figs.62–65). When on leaves, the gall is always attached to either a major or minor vein (Figs. 62–64). Each gall contains a single white larva. Galls on S. rugosa are 2.5–6.0 mm long and 0.7–1.2 mm wide at widest part, tapering toward apex, green to yellowish green, and covered by short, whitish hairs. Very young galls are sometimes accompanied by a tuft of hair at their base, almost as long as the gall itself. The species is multivoltine and galls can be found from late May to early October. It is heavily parasitized and adults are extremely difficult to rear. In September and October 2008, similar galls were found on Solidago altissima in Boyce, Virginia by M. Wise (Fig. 65). Only two females were reared from these galls, but based on their morphology and that of the galls, we concluded they belong to R. clarkei, confirming Felt’s report (1915) of this species from S. altissima. Remarks: The tiny, inconspicuous galls of R. clarkei were originally described only from Solidago rugosa, but we found very similar galls on three other hosts: R. altissima (Fig. 65), R. gigantea (Fig. 67), and R. juncea (Fig. 68). We initially assumed that galls from all these hosts belong to R. clarkei, but a recent molecular analysis (Dorchin et al., in prep.) indicate that the populations from S. gigantea and S. juncea represent distinct species, with the former being the closest relative of R. clarkei. Samples from S. altissima were not analyzed. The population from S. gigantea is discussed below under R. inquisitor and R. sp., whereas the population from S. juncea is described here as a new species – R. gina. Rhopalomyia clarkei is morphologically very similar to R. inquisitor, but differs from R. gina in having stouter male gonopods and in lacking a longitudinal groove along the antennal horns and lateral projections of the eyes in the pupa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicVector-Borne Animal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207