MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893941818 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5686016

Fallicambarus fodiens Cottle 1863

2013· article· en· W6893941818 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueCrustacean biology and ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRostrumCrayfishTelsonGonopodSetaQuadrate bone

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fallicambarus fodiens (Cottle, 1863): Digger Crayfish General charateristics. A heavy-bodied crayfish with broad chelae that rarely exceeds 80 mm in total length. The rostrum is broad and moderately excavated with no rostral spines. The acumen is very short with thinner margins than found on the rostrum. The areola is closed. Chelae are nearly oval or egg-shaped in outline, dorsoventrally flattened at the base of the fingers, and with a distinct basal notch on dactyl and dense patch of setae at base of propodus. There is a gap at the area of the notch when fingers are closed. In form I males, gonopods have two terminal processes that are at right angles to the main gonopod axis, and the primary process is strongly curved and bladelike. In females, the annulus ventralis is subcircular in outline and slightly asymmetrical with a deep medial trough through cephalic half (Taylor & Schuster, 2004). Life coloration. Chelae, carapace, and abdomen are reddish-tan to light and dark brown in color (Figure 39). The ventral side may be lighter from light brown to pale yellow. The abdomen sometimes exhibits darker brown longitudinal stripes on each side of midline. Similar species. Fallicambarus fodiens most closely resembles Cambarus diogenes and C. ludovicianus. All of these species have a closed areola and a notch in the base of the dactyl. However, this notch is deeper and lacks tubercles along its distal margin in F. fodiens. Fallicambarus fodiens can also be separated from the two Cambarus species by the lack of a suborbital angle, a trait that is even visible in smaller individuals (Taylor & Schuster, 2004). Distribution and habitat. Fallicambarus fodiens has a large but disjunct distribution (Hobbs, 1989; Hobbs & Robison, 1989; Jezerinac et al., 1995). The species occurs in the southern Great Lakes in Ontario and Michigan, south in the lower Ohio and central Mississippi River valleys, and along the Gulf Coast from east Texas to Florida. It can also be found along the Atlantic Coast from Maryland to South Carolina. Jezerinac and Stocker (1987) reported a third disjunct population along the Ohio River in west-central West Virginia. In Oklahoma, F. fodiens is known from 3 localities in LeFlore and McCurtain Counties, and 1 location in the north central portion of the state. According to the ecological niche model, suitable environmental conditions may also be found west of the 3 known southeast southeastern locations and north into the Ouachita and Boston Mountain ranges (Figure 40). Fallicambarus fodiens is a primary burrower in ephemeral wetlands, wooded flood plains, and low-lying fields (Jezerinac & Stocker, 1987; Page, 1985; Pflieger, 1996; Taylor & Schuster, 2004). Because this species is a primary burrower, it is often difficult to collect and easy to overlook. Hence, F. fodiens ’ distribution in Oklahoma may be broader than currently known. Life history. Fallicambarus fodiens constructs one of the least complex burrows of any species in its genus (Hobbs & Robison, 1989). Burrows often consist of a single, nearly vertical shaft, and depth varies depending on the distance to the water table. Frequently, there are other side passages leading away from the main shaft to the surface or a nearby water source. Surface openings are identified by a mound or chimney of mud, which is usually capped during drier periods. During high humidity, especially after warm rains, the crayfish may sit at the entrance of their burrow or move around the entrance in search of food, mates, or a new location for a burrow. Their food consists of plant fragments, especially grass seeds, and animal material, including insect fragments, crayfish parts, and juvenile salamanders (Bovbjerg, 1952). Creaser (1931) reported copulations occurring in the fall and early spring. Other studies have corroborated this finding with the collection of form I males, ovigerous females, and females with young from February through May and August through November, depending on the latitude (Bovbjerg, 1952; Creaser, 1931; Jezerinac et al., 1995; Page, 1985; Pflieger, 1996; Taylor & Schuster, 2004). Furthermore, Ainscough et al. (2013) have stated that F. fodiens is a species complex so as more research is conducted certain life history attributes may change. Syntopic species. Cambarellus puer, Cambarus diogenes, and Procambarus gracilis. Conservation status. AFS: Currently Stable; Heritage Rank: Widespread (G5); IUCN: Least Concern; ODWC: Not Listed. Additional resources. Ainscough et al. (2013); Bovbjerg (1952); Guiasu (2007); Guiasu & Dunham (2002); Jezerinac & Stocker (1987); Norrocky (1991); Taylor et al. (2010).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,048
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,095

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetCrustacean biology and ecologyTravaux en français237 207