MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893941818 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5686016

Fallicambarus fodiens Cottle 1863

2013· article· en· W6893941818 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRostrumCrayfishTelsonGonopodSetaQuadrate bone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fallicambarus fodiens (Cottle, 1863): Digger Crayfish General charateristics. A heavy-bodied crayfish with broad chelae that rarely exceeds 80 mm in total length. The rostrum is broad and moderately excavated with no rostral spines. The acumen is very short with thinner margins than found on the rostrum. The areola is closed. Chelae are nearly oval or egg-shaped in outline, dorsoventrally flattened at the base of the fingers, and with a distinct basal notch on dactyl and dense patch of setae at base of propodus. There is a gap at the area of the notch when fingers are closed. In form I males, gonopods have two terminal processes that are at right angles to the main gonopod axis, and the primary process is strongly curved and bladelike. In females, the annulus ventralis is subcircular in outline and slightly asymmetrical with a deep medial trough through cephalic half (Taylor & Schuster, 2004). Life coloration. Chelae, carapace, and abdomen are reddish-tan to light and dark brown in color (Figure 39). The ventral side may be lighter from light brown to pale yellow. The abdomen sometimes exhibits darker brown longitudinal stripes on each side of midline. Similar species. Fallicambarus fodiens most closely resembles Cambarus diogenes and C. ludovicianus. All of these species have a closed areola and a notch in the base of the dactyl. However, this notch is deeper and lacks tubercles along its distal margin in F. fodiens. Fallicambarus fodiens can also be separated from the two Cambarus species by the lack of a suborbital angle, a trait that is even visible in smaller individuals (Taylor & Schuster, 2004). Distribution and habitat. Fallicambarus fodiens has a large but disjunct distribution (Hobbs, 1989; Hobbs & Robison, 1989; Jezerinac et al., 1995). The species occurs in the southern Great Lakes in Ontario and Michigan, south in the lower Ohio and central Mississippi River valleys, and along the Gulf Coast from east Texas to Florida. It can also be found along the Atlantic Coast from Maryland to South Carolina. Jezerinac and Stocker (1987) reported a third disjunct population along the Ohio River in west-central West Virginia. In Oklahoma, F. fodiens is known from 3 localities in LeFlore and McCurtain Counties, and 1 location in the north central portion of the state. According to the ecological niche model, suitable environmental conditions may also be found west of the 3 known southeast southeastern locations and north into the Ouachita and Boston Mountain ranges (Figure 40). Fallicambarus fodiens is a primary burrower in ephemeral wetlands, wooded flood plains, and low-lying fields (Jezerinac & Stocker, 1987; Page, 1985; Pflieger, 1996; Taylor & Schuster, 2004). Because this species is a primary burrower, it is often difficult to collect and easy to overlook. Hence, F. fodiens ’ distribution in Oklahoma may be broader than currently known. Life history. Fallicambarus fodiens constructs one of the least complex burrows of any species in its genus (Hobbs & Robison, 1989). Burrows often consist of a single, nearly vertical shaft, and depth varies depending on the distance to the water table. Frequently, there are other side passages leading away from the main shaft to the surface or a nearby water source. Surface openings are identified by a mound or chimney of mud, which is usually capped during drier periods. During high humidity, especially after warm rains, the crayfish may sit at the entrance of their burrow or move around the entrance in search of food, mates, or a new location for a burrow. Their food consists of plant fragments, especially grass seeds, and animal material, including insect fragments, crayfish parts, and juvenile salamanders (Bovbjerg, 1952). Creaser (1931) reported copulations occurring in the fall and early spring. Other studies have corroborated this finding with the collection of form I males, ovigerous females, and females with young from February through May and August through November, depending on the latitude (Bovbjerg, 1952; Creaser, 1931; Jezerinac et al., 1995; Page, 1985; Pflieger, 1996; Taylor & Schuster, 2004). Furthermore, Ainscough et al. (2013) have stated that F. fodiens is a species complex so as more research is conducted certain life history attributes may change. Syntopic species. Cambarellus puer, Cambarus diogenes, and Procambarus gracilis. Conservation status. AFS: Currently Stable; Heritage Rank: Widespread (G5); IUCN: Least Concern; ODWC: Not Listed. Additional resources. Ainscough et al. (2013); Bovbjerg (1952); Guiasu (2007); Guiasu & Dunham (2002); Jezerinac & Stocker (1987); Norrocky (1991); Taylor et al. (2010).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207