MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893961791 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6091586

Anagyrus lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo, sp. n.

2016· article· en· W6893961791 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScapeHolotypeParatypePedicelScutellum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anagyrus lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo sp. n. (Figs 1–10) Type material. Holotype female [MLPA] on slide (Fig. 4) labeled: 1. “ ARGENTINA: Salta Los Lapachos, 24°36.114’S 65°04.877’W, 20.xi.2014 G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre, M. A. Saracho Bottero from Hypogeococcus sp. on Harrisia sp. Code: 24R”; 2. “Mounted by V. V. Berezovskiy 2015 in Canada balsam”; 3. [magenta] “ Anagyrus lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo HOLOTYPE ♀”; 4. “Det. by S. V. Triapitsyn 2015”. The host plant was later identified as Harrisia pomanensis. The holotype is in good condition, almost complete (lacking one middle leg), dissected under 3 coverslips. Paratypes (9 ♀, 14 ♂), same data as the holotype [2 ♀, 2 ♂ on points, IMLA; 3 ♀, 5 ♂ on points and 1 ♂ on slide, MLPA; 3 ♀, 5 ♂ on points and 1 ♀, 1 ♂ on slides, UCRC]. Description. FEMALE (holotype). Color. Body (as in Fig. 1) mostly brown or dark brown except frontovertex mostly orange (except face brown between toruli), eyes and ocelli gray; sides of pronotum yellow, mesopleuron orange; radicle brown, base of scape white and rest of scape brown or dark brown except for a wide, transverse, subapical white band, pedicel brown basally and white apically, F1 brown, rest of flagellum whitish gray; legs whitish except tarsi grayish. Sculpture. Head, particularly frontovertex, mesoscutum, axilla, scutellum, mesopleuron, propodeum, and gaster partially, with fine but conspicuous coriaceous-rugose sculpture; scape mostly reticulate. Pubescence. Frontovertex and pronotum with inconspicuous white setae; mesoscutum, axillae, and scutellum with numerous short, white setae except for a few longer ones on scutellum. Head (as in Fig. 8) slightly wider than high. Toruli just below level of lower eye margin. Ocelli in an almost equilateral triangle; minimum distance between posterior ocelli (POL) about 2× greater than that between posterior ocellus and eye margin (OOL). Maxillary palpus 4-segmented, labial palpus 3-segmented. Antenna (Fig. 3) with radicle 2.4× as long as wide, rest of scape broadened medially, 3.3× as long as wide; pedicel 2.2× as long as wide, longer than F1; funicle segments all longer than wide, F1–F5 equal in length and slightly shorter than F6; clava 3-segmented, 3.6× as long as wide and about as long as combined length of F4–F6; flagellar segments all with several (at least 2) longitudinal sensilla except F1 with 1 such sensillum. Mesosoma (as in Fig. 5). Mesoscutum about 2× as wide as long; scutellum a little wider than long, a little longer than mesoscutum, scutellar apex narrowly rounded, placoid sensilla about in the middle of scutellum.Wings (Fig. 6) not abbreviated, fore wing extending at least a little beyond apex of gaster. Fore wing 2.35× as long as wide, with disc hyaline; linea calva interrupted by 5–6 rows of setae; costal cell about 16× as long as wide; marginal vein longer than wide, postmarginal vein a little shorter than stigmal vein. Hind wing 4.5× as long as wide, with disc hyaline. Legs. Mesotibial spur slightly shorter than mesobasitarsus. Gaster (as in Fig. 5) longer than mesosoma. Ovipositor occupying about 0.6 length of gaster, not exserted beyond its apex, and 1.3× as long as metatibia. Measurements (µm) of the holotype. Mesosoma 455; metasoma 585; ovipositor 333. Antenna: radicle 36; rest of scape 145; pedicel 61; F1 42; F2 42; F3 42; F4 42; F5 42; F6 45; clava 142. Fore wing 738:314; longest marginal seta 30. Hind wing 515:115; longest marginal seta 36. Variation (paratypes). Body length 730–1255 µm (dry-mounted, critical point-dried specimens). Mesopleuron often orange-brown. Scape minus radicle 3.1× as long as wide; F2 sometimes with only 1 longitudinal sensillum. Fore wing 2.3× as long as wide; hind wing 4.6–4.7× as long as wide. MALE (paratypes). Body length 600–730 µm (dry-mounted, critical point-dried specimens). Body (Fig. 2) including head (Fig. 8) mostly dark brown except frontovertex brown with some orange, sides of pronotum orangebrown, and mesopleuron either orange-brown anteriorly or mostly brown; antenna with radicle brown, rest of scape mostly white except brown apically on dorsal side, pedicel brown basally and white apically, and flagellum whitish-gray; legs as in female. Antenna (Fig. 7) with scape minus short radicle 2.8–3.1× as long as wide; funicle segments all longer than wide (F1 the longest); clava entire, 4.4–5.4× as long as wide; flagellar segments all with longitudinal sensilla and numerous long setae, F6 with 5 and base of clava with 2 scale-like structures ventrally. Fore wing (Fig. 9) 2.2–2.3× as long as wide; hind wing 4.4–4.6× as long as wide. Gaster shorter than mesosoma; genitalia (Fig. 10; length 218–245 µm) occupying 0.5–0.8 length of gaster. Diagnosis. The new species is similar to both A. brevistigma De Santis (1964), described from Balcarce (San José de Balcarce), Buenos Aires, Argentina and later recorded in Pernambuco and São Paulo, Brazil from the mealybug Antonina graminis (Maskell) (De Santis 1980), and A. tanystis De Santis (1964), described from a single female specimen from the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. A modified couplet 14 from Triapitsyn, Logarzo et al. (2014) is provided below to separate females of these three species. 14(11) Scape (excluding radicle) white basally and relatively slender (Fig. 3; also see fig. 9, p. 62 in De Santis (1964)), at least 3.1× as long as wide......................................................................................................................................................................... 14a - Scape (excluding radicle) dark brown basally and relatively broad (see fig. 14, p. 211 in Triapitsyn, Logarzo et al. (2014)), about 2.5× as long as wide ...................................................................................................................... A. brevistigma De Santis 14a(14) Scape (excluding radicle) 4.0× as long as wide; F1 conspicuously longer than F2; clava markedly shorter than combined length of F4–F6 ............................................................................................................................................. A. tanystis De Santis - Scape (excluding radicle) 3.1–3.3× as long as wide; F1 about as long as F2; clava about as long as combined length of F4–F6 ........................................................................................................................................................................ A. lapachosus sp. n. Anagyrus lapachosus also differs from A. chilensis Brèthes, known from a single, incomplete female from Santiago, Chile, in the female having a much narrower scape (for comparison, see fig. 26, p. 217 in Triapitsyn, Logarzo et al. 2014); the latter species was not included in their key. In Noyes (2000), A. lapachosus keys to couplet 49 together with A. calyxtoi Noyes from Costa Rica, but female of the latter has a broader scape (about 2.3× as long as wide) which is black basally (Noyes 2000). The new taxon is not compared with any of the numerous described species of Anagyrus from the Old World because its host belongs to a mealybug genus whose native range is restricted to the New World, and also the host plant of this Hypogeococcus sp. is a cactus native to South America. According to our unpublished data, other Anagyrus species from Argentina that parasitize Hypogeococcus spp. appear to be host specific to this genus but not necessarily to a particular species within it. In Noyes & Hayat (1994) for instance, A. lapachosus would not key to any even remotely similar species. Etymology. The species name is derived from that of its type locality. Comments. Little is known about biology of this parasitoid besides its host association and some basic bionomic data provided below. Under laboratory conditions, females of A. lapachosus can attack nymphs of 1st and 2nd instars of the host Hypogeococcus sp. reared on Cleistocactus baumannii and Harrisia pomanensis. Adult wasps emerged from mummies of the adult mealybugs. Their longevity was 5±3 days at 25°C; females emerged with 30±18 mature eggs. The developmental time of the parasitoid from egg to adult was 46±14 days for females and 42±6 for males at 25°C.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,046

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,162 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsTravaux en français237 207