MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893961791 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6091586

Anagyrus lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo, sp. n.

2016· article· en· W6893961791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScapeHolotypeParatypePedicelScutellum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anagyrus lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo sp. n. (Figs 1–10) Type material. Holotype female [MLPA] on slide (Fig. 4) labeled: 1. “ ARGENTINA: Salta Los Lapachos, 24°36.114’S 65°04.877’W, 20.xi.2014 G. A. Logarzo, M. B. Aguirre, M. A. Saracho Bottero from Hypogeococcus sp. on Harrisia sp. Code: 24R”; 2. “Mounted by V. V. Berezovskiy 2015 in Canada balsam”; 3. [magenta] “ Anagyrus lapachosus Triapitsyn, Aguirre & Logarzo HOLOTYPE ♀”; 4. “Det. by S. V. Triapitsyn 2015”. The host plant was later identified as Harrisia pomanensis. The holotype is in good condition, almost complete (lacking one middle leg), dissected under 3 coverslips. Paratypes (9 ♀, 14 ♂), same data as the holotype [2 ♀, 2 ♂ on points, IMLA; 3 ♀, 5 ♂ on points and 1 ♂ on slide, MLPA; 3 ♀, 5 ♂ on points and 1 ♀, 1 ♂ on slides, UCRC]. Description. FEMALE (holotype). Color. Body (as in Fig. 1) mostly brown or dark brown except frontovertex mostly orange (except face brown between toruli), eyes and ocelli gray; sides of pronotum yellow, mesopleuron orange; radicle brown, base of scape white and rest of scape brown or dark brown except for a wide, transverse, subapical white band, pedicel brown basally and white apically, F1 brown, rest of flagellum whitish gray; legs whitish except tarsi grayish. Sculpture. Head, particularly frontovertex, mesoscutum, axilla, scutellum, mesopleuron, propodeum, and gaster partially, with fine but conspicuous coriaceous-rugose sculpture; scape mostly reticulate. Pubescence. Frontovertex and pronotum with inconspicuous white setae; mesoscutum, axillae, and scutellum with numerous short, white setae except for a few longer ones on scutellum. Head (as in Fig. 8) slightly wider than high. Toruli just below level of lower eye margin. Ocelli in an almost equilateral triangle; minimum distance between posterior ocelli (POL) about 2× greater than that between posterior ocellus and eye margin (OOL). Maxillary palpus 4-segmented, labial palpus 3-segmented. Antenna (Fig. 3) with radicle 2.4× as long as wide, rest of scape broadened medially, 3.3× as long as wide; pedicel 2.2× as long as wide, longer than F1; funicle segments all longer than wide, F1–F5 equal in length and slightly shorter than F6; clava 3-segmented, 3.6× as long as wide and about as long as combined length of F4–F6; flagellar segments all with several (at least 2) longitudinal sensilla except F1 with 1 such sensillum. Mesosoma (as in Fig. 5). Mesoscutum about 2× as wide as long; scutellum a little wider than long, a little longer than mesoscutum, scutellar apex narrowly rounded, placoid sensilla about in the middle of scutellum.Wings (Fig. 6) not abbreviated, fore wing extending at least a little beyond apex of gaster. Fore wing 2.35× as long as wide, with disc hyaline; linea calva interrupted by 5–6 rows of setae; costal cell about 16× as long as wide; marginal vein longer than wide, postmarginal vein a little shorter than stigmal vein. Hind wing 4.5× as long as wide, with disc hyaline. Legs. Mesotibial spur slightly shorter than mesobasitarsus. Gaster (as in Fig. 5) longer than mesosoma. Ovipositor occupying about 0.6 length of gaster, not exserted beyond its apex, and 1.3× as long as metatibia. Measurements (µm) of the holotype. Mesosoma 455; metasoma 585; ovipositor 333. Antenna: radicle 36; rest of scape 145; pedicel 61; F1 42; F2 42; F3 42; F4 42; F5 42; F6 45; clava 142. Fore wing 738:314; longest marginal seta 30. Hind wing 515:115; longest marginal seta 36. Variation (paratypes). Body length 730–1255 µm (dry-mounted, critical point-dried specimens). Mesopleuron often orange-brown. Scape minus radicle 3.1× as long as wide; F2 sometimes with only 1 longitudinal sensillum. Fore wing 2.3× as long as wide; hind wing 4.6–4.7× as long as wide. MALE (paratypes). Body length 600–730 µm (dry-mounted, critical point-dried specimens). Body (Fig. 2) including head (Fig. 8) mostly dark brown except frontovertex brown with some orange, sides of pronotum orangebrown, and mesopleuron either orange-brown anteriorly or mostly brown; antenna with radicle brown, rest of scape mostly white except brown apically on dorsal side, pedicel brown basally and white apically, and flagellum whitish-gray; legs as in female. Antenna (Fig. 7) with scape minus short radicle 2.8–3.1× as long as wide; funicle segments all longer than wide (F1 the longest); clava entire, 4.4–5.4× as long as wide; flagellar segments all with longitudinal sensilla and numerous long setae, F6 with 5 and base of clava with 2 scale-like structures ventrally. Fore wing (Fig. 9) 2.2–2.3× as long as wide; hind wing 4.4–4.6× as long as wide. Gaster shorter than mesosoma; genitalia (Fig. 10; length 218–245 µm) occupying 0.5–0.8 length of gaster. Diagnosis. The new species is similar to both A. brevistigma De Santis (1964), described from Balcarce (San José de Balcarce), Buenos Aires, Argentina and later recorded in Pernambuco and São Paulo, Brazil from the mealybug Antonina graminis (Maskell) (De Santis 1980), and A. tanystis De Santis (1964), described from a single female specimen from the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. A modified couplet 14 from Triapitsyn, Logarzo et al. (2014) is provided below to separate females of these three species. 14(11) Scape (excluding radicle) white basally and relatively slender (Fig. 3; also see fig. 9, p. 62 in De Santis (1964)), at least 3.1× as long as wide......................................................................................................................................................................... 14a - Scape (excluding radicle) dark brown basally and relatively broad (see fig. 14, p. 211 in Triapitsyn, Logarzo et al. (2014)), about 2.5× as long as wide ...................................................................................................................... A. brevistigma De Santis 14a(14) Scape (excluding radicle) 4.0× as long as wide; F1 conspicuously longer than F2; clava markedly shorter than combined length of F4–F6 ............................................................................................................................................. A. tanystis De Santis - Scape (excluding radicle) 3.1–3.3× as long as wide; F1 about as long as F2; clava about as long as combined length of F4–F6 ........................................................................................................................................................................ A. lapachosus sp. n. Anagyrus lapachosus also differs from A. chilensis Brèthes, known from a single, incomplete female from Santiago, Chile, in the female having a much narrower scape (for comparison, see fig. 26, p. 217 in Triapitsyn, Logarzo et al. 2014); the latter species was not included in their key. In Noyes (2000), A. lapachosus keys to couplet 49 together with A. calyxtoi Noyes from Costa Rica, but female of the latter has a broader scape (about 2.3× as long as wide) which is black basally (Noyes 2000). The new taxon is not compared with any of the numerous described species of Anagyrus from the Old World because its host belongs to a mealybug genus whose native range is restricted to the New World, and also the host plant of this Hypogeococcus sp. is a cactus native to South America. According to our unpublished data, other Anagyrus species from Argentina that parasitize Hypogeococcus spp. appear to be host specific to this genus but not necessarily to a particular species within it. In Noyes & Hayat (1994) for instance, A. lapachosus would not key to any even remotely similar species. Etymology. The species name is derived from that of its type locality. Comments. Little is known about biology of this parasitoid besides its host association and some basic bionomic data provided below. Under laboratory conditions, females of A. lapachosus can attack nymphs of 1st and 2nd instars of the host Hypogeococcus sp. reared on Cleistocactus baumannii and Harrisia pomanensis. Adult wasps emerged from mummies of the adult mealybugs. Their longevity was 5±3 days at 25°C; females emerged with 30±18 mature eggs. The developmental time of the parasitoid from egg to adult was 46±14 days for females and 42±6 for males at 25°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207