Tricorythodes mosegus Alba-Tercedor and Flannagan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Tricorythodes mosegus AlbaTercedor and Flannagan Tricorythodes mosegus AlbaTercedor and Flannagan, 1995:1589. Tricorythodes mosegus was described by AlbaTercedor and Flannagan (1995) based upon male and female imagoes from Manitoba, Canada. The larval stage is described here for the first time based upon reared specimens from Connecticut, USA. Tricorythodes mosegus is also documented here for the first time from the state of Maine. Previous records of this species in the United States are from Indiana and Michigan (Randolph and McCafferty, 1998). Larvae examined for this study were all reared. As such, it is not possible to provide details on the coloration of the species, because the coloration is not retained in the larval cast skin. Larva: Body length 4.5–5.5 mm; caudal filaments 2.5–3.5 mm. Head: Compound eyes remote, widely separated; ocelli clear. Antennae approximately 2x length of head capsule. Mouthparts: Labrum (Fig. 19) dorsally with long, fine simple setae along lateral margin; row of elongate, branched setae recessed from anterior margin; ventrally with vertical row of simple, fine setae near midline, and row of short, branched setae along anterior margin. Right mandible (Fig. 20) with outer incisors threelobed; inner incisor twolobed; prostheca and molar region as in Fig. 20; scattered setae on dorsal surface. Left mandible (Fig. 21) with outer incisors fourlobed, mostly fused; inner incisor with two denticles; prostheca arising at base of inner incisor, appearing fused with side of outer incisor; molar region as in Fig. 21; scattered setae on dorsal surface. Hypopharynx with long, fine simple setae on anterior surface (Fig. 22); inner basal edge of superlinguae with row of setae. Maxilla (Fig. 23) with threesegmented palp and short, terminal setae; apex of galealacinia with fused two large fused apical spines row of heavy setae Labium (Fig. 24) with moderatelyexpanded mentum with numerous long, simple setae along outer margins and ventrally; glossae and paraglossae subequal in length with smooth margins; glossae with small fine, simple setae; paraglossae with numerous long, simple setae; notch between glossae slightly deeper and more rounded than notches between glossae and paraglossae; labial palp threesegmented with long, simple setae. Thorax: Scattered small hairs and setae present. Dorsal surface of forefemur with median transverse row of long setae, inner margin with smaller setae basally and outer margin with row of long setae apically (Fig. 25). Tarsal claws (Fig. 26) with single row of uniform, small flattened denticles numbering 10–12. Meso and metafemora with few, scattered setae on dorsal surface not forming a distinct row as in forefemur; meso and metaclaws with approximately 10 and 12 denticles, respectively; denticles sometimes flattened and appear as a single structure. Abdomen: Scattered hairlike setae present on terga. Dorsal lamella of gill 2 (operculate gill) subtriangular, brownishyellow with scattered patches of black shading (Fig. 27); outer margin with longitudinal ridge and scattered small setae along edge of ridge; numerous long and short setae along margin of gill. Cerci with row of setae at each annulation. Type Material Examined: Paratype: CANADA: Manitoba, Assiniboine River, St. Francois Xavier, Lido Plage Rd., 49°52'24"N; 97°30'35"W, 09vii1993, 1M (FSCA (FAMU) E2051). Other Material Examined: USA: Connecticut, New Haven Co.; Bladdens Brk., Seymour @ jct. of Rt. 67 and Sokarat Rd., 22vii1996, S.K. Burian, 2M (reared) (NEL, TAMU); USA: Connecticut, Hartford County, Connecticut River at Kings Island boat ramp, sandy area at end of path (41°54'59"N; 72°36'30"W), 20vii1997, S.K. Burian, 1M (reared), 1F (reared) (TAMU).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,040 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».