MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894035396 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6275656

Tricorythodes mosegus Alba-Tercedor and Flannagan

2003· article· en· W6894035396 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaSimple eye in invertebratesMandible (arthropod mouthpart)TuftDorsumGroove (engineering)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tricorythodes mosegus Alba­Tercedor and Flannagan Tricorythodes mosegus Alba­Tercedor and Flannagan, 1995:1589. Tricorythodes mosegus was described by Alba­Tercedor and Flannagan (1995) based upon male and female imagoes from Manitoba, Canada. The larval stage is described here for the first time based upon reared specimens from Connecticut, USA. Tricorythodes mosegus is also documented here for the first time from the state of Maine. Previous records of this species in the United States are from Indiana and Michigan (Randolph and McCafferty, 1998). Larvae examined for this study were all reared. As such, it is not possible to provide details on the coloration of the species, because the coloration is not retained in the larval cast skin. Larva: Body length 4.5–5.5 mm; caudal filaments 2.5–3.5 mm. Head: Compound eyes remote, widely separated; ocelli clear. Antennae approximately 2x length of head capsule. Mouthparts: Labrum (Fig. 19) dorsally with long, fine simple setae along lateral margin; row of elongate, branched setae recessed from anterior margin; ventrally with vertical row of simple, fine setae near mid­line, and row of short, branched setae along anterior margin. Right mandible (Fig. 20) with outer incisors threelobed; inner incisor two­lobed; prostheca and molar region as in Fig. 20; scattered setae on dorsal surface. Left mandible (Fig. 21) with outer incisors four­lobed, mostly fused; inner incisor with two denticles; prostheca arising at base of inner incisor, appearing fused with side of outer incisor; molar region as in Fig. 21; scattered setae on dorsal surface. Hypopharynx with long, fine simple setae on anterior surface (Fig. 22); inner basal edge of superlinguae with row of setae. Maxilla (Fig. 23) with three­segmented palp and short, terminal setae; apex of galea­lacinia with fused two large fused apical spines row of heavy setae Labium (Fig. 24) with moderately­expanded mentum with numerous long, simple setae along outer margins and ventrally; glossae and paraglossae subequal in length with smooth margins; glossae with small fine, simple setae; paraglossae with numerous long, simple setae; notch between glossae slightly deeper and more rounded than notches between glossae and paraglossae; labial palp three­segmented with long, simple setae. Thorax: Scattered small hairs and setae present. Dorsal surface of forefemur with median transverse row of long setae, inner margin with smaller setae basally and outer margin with row of long setae apically (Fig. 25). Tarsal claws (Fig. 26) with single row of uniform, small flattened denticles numbering 10–12. Meso­ and metafemora with few, scattered setae on dorsal surface not forming a distinct row as in forefemur; meso­ and metaclaws with approximately 10 and 12 denticles, respectively; denticles sometimes flattened and appear as a single structure. Abdomen: Scattered hairlike setae present on terga. Dorsal lamella of gill 2 (operculate gill) subtriangular, brownish­yellow with scattered patches of black shading (Fig. 27); outer margin with longitudinal ridge and scattered small setae along edge of ridge; numerous long and short setae along margin of gill. Cerci with row of setae at each annulation. Type Material Examined: Paratype: CANADA: Manitoba, Assiniboine River, St. Francois Xavier, Lido Plage Rd., 49°52'24"N; 97°30'35"W, 09­vii­1993, 1M (FSCA (FAMU) E2051). Other Material Examined: USA: Connecticut, New Haven Co.; Bladdens Brk., Seymour @ jct. of Rt. 67 and Sokarat Rd., 22­vii­1996, S.K. Burian, 2M (reared) (NEL, TAMU); USA: Connecticut, Hartford County, Connecticut River at Kings Island boat ramp, sandy area at end of path (41°54'59"N; 72°36'30"W), 20­vii­1997, S.K. Burian, 1M (reared), 1F (reared) (TAMU).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207