A Programme of Archaeological Mitigation at Land at Foxley Wood, Buxton Road, Spixworth
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The objective of the trial trenching was to record any archaeological evidence revealed to evaluate the development area for potential sub-surface archaeological features. Three 1.8m wide trenches were excavated under archaeological control using a 3-ton 3600 machine fitted with a ditching bucket. Spoil, exposed surfaces and features were scanned with a metal detector (Minelab XTerra 705). All metal-detected and hand-collected finds were retained for inspection, other than those which were obviously modern. All archaeological features and deposits were recorded using Norvic Archaeology pro forma sheets. The trench location, plans and sections were recorded at appropriate scales and digital images were taken of all relevant features and deposits. The results of an archaeological evaluation by trial trenching of land of land at Foxley Wood, Buxton Road, Spixworth. At the time of works the grassed field area (c.3400m2) was proposed for the development of x4 residential houses with garages. The proposed development site is located immediately adjacent to the route of a possible section of Roman road which runs from Brampton to Thorpe St Andrew. The feature is visible on aerial photographs as a series of linear bank features, showing up as cropmarks. In addition, recent archaeological investigation immediately to the south identified post-medieval activity of uncertain nature which includes man-made ponds, a flint lined well, a trackway and field boundaries. Only three features were identified, in the form of three shallow posthole bases of post-medieval date, all within Trench 3. The function of any posts here is likely to relate to post-medieval stock management of temporary fencing on land that was historically rather wet and clay heavy for pre-industrial ploughing. Only a small number of 18th to 20th century residual finds were recovered from the subsoil and ploughsoil. The discovery of a clay natural here in the form of a dense 'brickearth', primarily at the eastern end of the development plot, is worthy of note in relation to a concentration of post-medieval activity previously identified to the southwest through excavation in 2021.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».